UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.__)No.Filed by the Registrant ☑ | Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ |
)
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
| | | | | |
| |
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| |
| ☐ | Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| |
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| |
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| |
| ☐ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check
the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
☑ | | | | | |
| |
| ☒ | No fee required.required |
| | | |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| | |
| 1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| 2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| 3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| | |
| 4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| | |
| 5) | Total fee paid: |
| | |
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials |
| | | |
| ☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Securities Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)of 1934 Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.0-11 |
| | | |
| 1) | Amount previously paid: |
| | |
| 2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| | |
| 3) | Filing Party: |
| | |
| 4) | Date Filed: |
| | | | | | | | |
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of iRobot Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to be held on Friday, May 27, 2022, at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time. The annual meeting will again be held entirely online this year. You will be able to attend and participate in the annual meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2022, where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions. Given the virtual format, there is no opportunity to attend this annual meeting in person. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) to attend the annual meeting. | | |
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of iRobot Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to be held on Tuesday, May 25, 2021, at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time. The annual meeting will again be held entirely online this year. You will be able to attend and participate in the annual meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021, where you will be able to vote electronically and submit questions. Given the virtual format, there is no opportunity to attend this annual meeting in person. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) to attend the annual meeting.
At this annual meeting, you will be asked to (1) elect
three (3)two (2) Class
III directors, each to serve for a three-year
term, and to elect one (1) Class III director, to serve for a one-year term; (2) ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year; (3) approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements; (4) approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to declassify the board of directors; (5) approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to eliminate the prohibition on stockholders’ ability to call a special meeting;
(6) approve an amendment to the iRobot Corporation 2018 Stock Option and
(6)Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) to increase the maximum number of shares reserved and issuable under the 2018 Plan; and (7) approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.
The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR election of the director nominees, FOR ratification of appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, FOR approval of amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements, FOR approval of amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to declassify the board of directors, FOR approval of amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to eliminate the prohibition on stockholders’ ability to call a special meeting,
FOR approval of an amendment to the 2018 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares reserved and issuable under the 2018 Plan, and FOR approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. Details regarding the matters to be acted upon at this annual meeting appear in the accompanying Proxy Statement. Please give the accompanying materials your careful attention.
Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting online, we urge you to vote on the business to come before this annual meeting so that your shares will be represented at the annual meeting. If you attend the annual meeting online, you may vote during the meeting electronically even if you have previously returned a proxy. Your prompt cooperation will be greatly appreciated.
BECAUSE APPROVAL OF PROPOSALS 3, 4 AND 5 REQUIRES THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF AT LEAST 75% OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES, YOUR VOTE WILL BE ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT AT THIS YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING.
Thank you for your continued support, interest and investment in iRobot.
Sincerely,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
April
12, 2021
SUMMARY OF RECENT AND PROPOSED
CHANGES TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In recent years, HIGHLIGHTS
iRobot
has taken important stepsremains deeply committed to
evolveevolving key corporate governance practices and policies that shape board engagement, the composition of the board of directors, and executive
compensation matters.compensation. For the upcoming
20212022 annual meeting of stockholders (the
“2021“2022 Annual Meeting”), stockholders are asked to vote on
sixseven proposals that are detailed in this year’s Proxy Statement, including proposals related to the aforementioned areas. Below
are somewe have provided highlights of
recentlast year’s Annual Meeting results, notable corporate governance
practices and policies, changes
includingin board composition, key elements of executive compensation, and additional information about certain proposals that will be voted upon at the
20212022 Annual
Meeting:Corporate Governance
iRobot has continued a strong commitment to adopting and maintaining best practices in its corporate governance activities and policies, which informs overall board engagement, board composition and executive compensation matters. The past year tested our Company like no other. We take tremendous pride in our 2020 performance, achievements and strategic progress. The insights, guidance and counsel from our board of directors was invaluable in helping us successfully navigate a year of unprecedented challenges.
For the upcoming Meeting.
2021 Annual Meeting Results:
Every proposal for stockholders are asked to vote on six proposals that are detailedat the 2021 Annual Meeting received overwhelming support, with a minimum of at least 94% of the shares voted in this year’s Proxy Statement. Three specific proposals aimed at enhancing ourfavor. Despite the support, three corporate governance practices and responding to expressed interestsproposals fell shy of stockholders have failed to attainattaining the required stockholder support to passof at least 75% of the Company’s total shares outstanding in recent years notwithstanding our ongoing investments and effortsfavor, with just over 70% of the total shares outstanding in getting thesefavor. These long-standing proposals passed. These proposals are:encompassed: (1) eliminating supermajority voting requirements; (2) declassifying our board of directors; and (3) eliminating the prohibition on stockholders’ ability to call a special meeting. 2021 marked the fifth consecutive year that these proposals have failed to pass. Additional details regarding the voting at last year’s Annual Meeting are provided within the Proxy Statement.
2022 Annual Meeting Proposals:
Although we did not achieve the requisite threshold of stockholder support for the aforementioned corporate governance proposals, we are undaunted in our efforts to enhance our corporate governance practices and respond to expressed interests of our stockholders. Our board has again carefully considered the advantages and disadvantages of each of these proposals this year and determined that the merits of these proposals outweigh their disadvantages. Accordingly, our board has again submitted these proposals to our stockholders for approval. In addition to these proposals, stockholders are also asked to vote on the election of
three (3)two (2) class
III directors,
each to serve for a three-year term, and the election of one (1) class III director to serve a one-year term, the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year,
approval of an amendment to the 2018 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares reserved and
issuable under the 2018 Plan, and the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Notable
Corporate Governance Practices and Policies
As you review the details of these proposals within the accompanying Proxy Statement, we ask stockholders to keep in mind the Company’s successful implementation of a range of what we believe are stockholder-friendly practices and policies. These include the following:
*
| The Company is seeking stockholder approval at the 2021 Annual Meeting to 1) declassify its board of directors; 2) eliminate supermajority voting requirements in its governing documents relating to removal of directors and amendments to the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws; and 3) allow stockholders to call special meetings. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
Board Composition
We did not make any changes
In November 2021, we appointed Karen Golz, a former Global Vice Chair of Ernst & Young who has extensive domestic and international experience working with global organizations on complex issues involving accounting, auditing, risk and regulatory matters, to the composition of our board of directors. Ms. Golz replaced Elisha Finney, who had served on the Company’s board of directors since 2017, and she has been nominated as a Class III director to serve for a one-year term until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2020.the year 2023 or until her successor has been duly elected and qualified or until her earlier death, resignation or removal. Ms. Golz’s deep financial background, coupled with her knowledge of international accounting and the regulatory environment for scaling high growth companies, aligns well with the Company’s needs. We evaluate our board member skills for alignment with iRobot’s strategic goals on an ongoing basis. Each independent director on our board brings considerable experience, domain expertise, complementary skills and relevant insights in the areas that are critical to the Company’s strategic direction and long-term success. Additionally, our board is strengthened by its diversity whether it be the industry expertise, gender, geographic residency or ethnicity of its members. Please see pages 9-17 7-16 of the Proxy Statement for additional information about each director serving on our Board, including the director nominees.
Director Facts and Figures
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Since 2017, the long-term incentive component of our executive compensation plan has reflected a 50/50 mix of performance share units (“PSUs”) and time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”)
., with the mix for our CEO’s long-term equity recently adjusted to be 40% RSU and 60% PSU. The PSUs have metrics based on our cumulative financial performance measured at the end of a given three-year performance period. Additionally, since 2017 we have had the ability to achieve an above-target payout for PSUs when the performance metrics exceed our target levels.
In 2020, we continuedWe continue to evolve our executive compensation plan designs to better reflect underlying business conditions and better align with recent changes in our financial reporting. The following represents key elements of our executive compensation practices:
| | | | | |
| * | Representative mix of compensation.For additional information, please see page 37 of this Proxy Statement. |
| ** | Representative mix of compensation for all executive officers except the CEO, whose long-term equity awards are 40% in the form of RSUs and 60% in the form of PSUs. For additional information, please see page 41 of this Proxy Statement. |
Notice of compensation. For additional information, please see page 43Annual Meeting of thisStockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement.Statement
Rewarding Our Stockholders
Individual stockholders who have owned at least 100 shares of iRobot common stock for at least six months are eligible for special offers that include discounts on purchasing a new floor cleaning robot from iRobot or a special gift when buying a new Roomba robot vacuum cleaner. Eligible stockholders can redeem these perks by using the free Stockperks application, which is available for download on the Apple App Store or the Google Play Store.
As noted above and outlined in greater detail within the Proxy Statement,
stockholders have overwhelmingly supported the three proposals included in the enclosed Proxy Statement relating to amendmentswe fell just 1.3 million shares short of
our certificate of incorporation to (1) declassify our board of directors; (2) eliminate supermajority voting requirements in our governing documents relating to removal of directors and amendments to the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws; and (3) allow stockholders to call special meetings. However, none of these proposals achievedachieving the requisite affirmative vote of at least 75% of the outstanding shares to
pass.pass three corporate governance proposals that will again be voted upon at the 2022 Annual Meeting. We
continue to strongly believe in the merits of each
proposal, and we urge all stockholders to vote their shares, regardlessof these proposals. Regardless of how many shares you own or whether you plan to attend the
online meeting.virtual Annual Meeting, we urge all stockholders to vote their shares. Simply stated, voting your shares could make the difference between whether these proposals pass in 2022 or once again we need to invest more time and money to submit these proposals for stockholder consideration in the future. We appreciate your cooperation and support.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
iROBOT CORPORATION
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on May
25, 202127, 2022
To the Stockholders of iRobot Corporation:
The annual meeting of stockholders of iRobot Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held on
Tuesday,Friday, May
25, 2021,27, 2022, at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time. The annual meeting will be held entirely online this year again due in part to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The annual meeting is being held for the following purposes:
1. To elect
three (3)two (2) Class
III directors, nominated by the board of directors, each to serve for a three-year term, and until his
successor has been duly elected and qualified or
until his earlier death, resignation or removal, and to elect one (1) Class III director, nominated by the board of directors, to serve for a one-year term and until her successor has been duly elected and qualified or until
his or her earlier
death, resignation or removal;
2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year;
3. To approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements;
4. To approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to declassify the board of directors;
5. To approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to eliminate the prohibition on stockholders’ ability to call a special meeting;
6. To approve an amendment to the iRobot Corporation 2018 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) to increase the maximum number of shares reserved and issuable under the 2018 Plan;
7. To hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement; and
7.
8. To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Proposal 1 relates solely to the election of
three (3)two (2) Class
III directors
and one (1) Class III director nominated by the board of directors and does not include any other matters relating to the election of directors. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31,
20212022 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.
We are mailing our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), instead of a paper copy of our Proxy Statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended January
2, 20211, 2022 (the
“2020“2021 Annual Report”). Stockholders who have requested a paper copy of our proxy materials will continue to receive them by mail. The Notice contains instructions on how to access those documents over the Internet and how to request a paper copy of our Proxy Statement, the
20202021 Annual Report, and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting online. To assure your representation at the annual meeting, we urge you, regardless of whether you plan to attend the annual meeting online, to sign, date and return the proxy card (if you received printed proxy materials) or to vote over the telephone or on the Internet as instructed in these proxy materials so that your shares will be represented at the annual meeting. If your shares are held in “street name,” that is, held for your account by a broker or other nominee, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must follow for your shares to be voted.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
To be admitted to the annual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021IRBT2022, you must enter the 16-digit control number included on your Notice or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) to attend the annual meeting. We encourage you to access the annual meeting before it begins. Online check-in to access the meeting will start shortly before the meeting on May 25, 2021.27, 2022. If you attend the annual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021IRBT2022, you may vote electronically during the meeting even if you have previously returned a proxy. Stockholders will also have the opportunity to submit questions prior to the annual meeting at www.proxyvote.com by logging on with your control number or during the annual meeting through www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021IRBT2022. A technical support telephone number will be posted on the log-in page of www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021 IRBT2022that you can call if you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or during the meeting.
In closing, we urge all stockholders to vote their shares TODAY using the proxy card (if you received printed proxy materials) or vote online or by telephone, as instructed, regardless of how many shares you own or whether you plan to attend the meeting online. We appreciate your cooperation and support in making sure your shares are represented.
Important Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 25, 202127, 2022
This Notice of 20212022 Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, and 20202021 Annual Report are available for viewing, printing and downloading at www.proxyvote.com. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | By Orderorder of the Board of Directors, |
| | | |
|  |
| | GLEN D. WEINSTEIN |
| | | Executive Vice President, |
| | | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary |
| | | Bedford, Massachusetts |
| | | April 12, 2021 |
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING ONLINE, PLEASE VOTE BY TELEPHONE, OVER THE INTERNET, OR BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE PROXY CARD IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED (IF YOU RECEIVED PRINTED PROXY MATERIALS) IN ORDER TO ENSURE REPRESENTATION OF YOUR SHARES.
 | | |
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING ONLINE, PLEASE VOTE BY TELEPHONE, OVER THE INTERNET, OR BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE PROXY CARD IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED (IF YOU RECEIVED PRINTED PROXY MATERIALS) IN ORDER TO ENSURE REPRESENTATION OF YOUR SHARES. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
| |
| 6555 |
| 6555 |
| 6655 |
| 6656 |
| 6756 |
| 6857 |
| 6958 |
| 7059 |
| 7160 |
| 7261 |
| 7362 |
| 63 |
| 69 |
| 7470 |
| 7470 |
| 7571 |
| 7773 |
| 7773 |
| 73 |
| 7874 |
| A-1 |
| B-1 |
| C-1 |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
PROXY STATEMENT
For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held on May
25, 202127, 2022
This Proxy Statement and related materials have been made available to you on the Internet, or have been delivered to you by mail at your request, on behalf of the board of directors of iRobot Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “iRobot”), for use at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on
Tuesday,Friday, May
25, 2021,27, 2022, at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time. The annual meeting will again be held entirely online this year again due in part to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Additional details regarding attending the virtual annual meeting and voting at the meeting are provided below.
Important Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 25, 202127, 2022
We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) “notice and access” rules, which we believe produces cost savings associated with reduced printing and postage expenses as well as promotes a positive environmental impact tied to lower quantities of materials that will be produced and delivered to stockholders. On or about April
13, 2021,11, 2022, we mailed to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement and our
20202021 Annual Report. We believe that providing our proxy materials over the Internet expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lowers costs and reduces the environmental impact of our annual stockholder meeting. As a stockholder of the Company, you are invited to participate in the
virtual annual meeting, and are entitled and requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. The Notice of Internet Availability instructs you on how to submit your proxy or voting instructions through the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, the Notice of Internet Availability instructs you on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, including a proxy card or voting instruction form that includes instructions on how to submit your proxy or voting instructions by mail or telephone.
This Proxy Statement and our 20202021 Annual Report to stockholders are available for viewing, printing and downloading at www.proxyvote.com. A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021,1, 2022, as filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021,15, 2022, will be furnished without charge to any stockholder upon written request to iRobot Corporation, 8 Crosby Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, Attention: Investor Relations. This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 20211, 2022 are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The purposes of the annual meeting are to elect three (3)two (2) Class III directors, each to serve for a three-year term, and to elect one (1) Class III director, to serve for a one-year term, to ratify the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, to approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting requirements, to approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to declassify the board of directors, to approve amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to eliminate the prohibition on stockholders’ ability to call a special meeting (such amendments, together, the “Charter Amendments”), to approve an amendment to the 2018 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares reserved and issuable under the 2018 Plan, and to hold a non-binding,Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2021,2022, will be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. As of
March 31, 2021, 28,395,015 2022, 27,115,849 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company were issued and outstanding. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on any proposal presented at the annual meeting.
Stockholders may vote
via the Internetelectronically during the online meeting or by proxy.
If you attend the annual meeting online, you may vote during the meeting electronically evenEven if you have previously voted by
proxy.proxy, you may change your votes and vote again electronically if you attend the annual meeting online. Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is voted. Proxies may be revoked by (i) filing a written notice of revocation bearing a later date than the proxy with the Secretary of the Company, (ii) duly completing a later-dated proxy relating to the same shares, or (iii) attending the annual meeting online and voting during the meeting electronically (although attendance at the annual meeting online will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy). Any written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy should be sent so as to be delivered to iRobot Corporation, 8 Crosby Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, Attention: Secretary, before the taking of the vote at the annual meeting.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
1
The representation at the
virtual annual meeting
online or by proxy of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Votes withheld from any nominee, abstentions and broker “non-votes” are counted as present or represented for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the annual meeting. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner votes on one proposal but does not vote on another proposal because, with respect to such other proposal, the nominee does not have discretionary voting power and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker “non-votes” are not considered voted for the particular matter. If you hold your shares in “street-name” through a broker or other nominee, if the nominee does not have discretionary voting power and absent voting instructions from you, your shares will not be counted as voting.
For Proposal 1, our by-laws require that each director be elected by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast by holders of shares present, online or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not be counted as voting with respect to the election of the directors and, therefore, will not have an effect on the election of the Class
I directors.II directors or the Class III director.
For Proposal 2, the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year, Proposal 6, the vote to approve the amendment to the 2018 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares reserved and issuable under the 2018 Plan and Proposal 6,7, the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, an affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast by holders of shares present, online or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on each such matter is required for approval. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not considered votes cast for Proposals 2, 6 and 6,7, and, therefore, will not have any effect on the outcome of such Proposals.
For Proposals 3, 4 and 5, votes on the Charter Amendments, an affirmative vote of not less than 75% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote as of the record date is required for approval of each such Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have the same effect as if you voted against Proposals 3, 4 and 5.
All properly executed proxies returned in time to be counted at the annual meeting will be voted by the named proxies at the annual meeting. Where a choice has been specified on the proxy with respect to the foregoing matters, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
the specifications. If you return a validly executed proxy without indicating how your shares should be voted on a matter, your proxies will be voted FOR election of the director nominees, FOR ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, FOR each of the Charter Amendments FOR approval of the amendment to the 2018 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares reserved and issuable under the 2018 Plan and FOR the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.
Aside from the election of directors, the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, the approval of the Charter Amendments,
the approval of the amendment to the 2018 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares reserved and issuable under the 2018 Plan and the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the board of directors knows of no other matters to be presented at the annual meeting. If any other matter should be presented at the annual meeting upon which a vote properly may be taken, shares represented by all proxy cards received by the board of directors will be voted with respect thereto at the discretion of the persons named as proxies.
It is important that your shares be voted regardless of whether you attend the online meeting. Please follow the voting instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that you received. If you received a proxy card or voting instruction form, please complete the proxy card or voting instruction form promptly. If your shares are held in a bank or brokerage account, you may be eligible to vote electronically or by telephone – please refer to your voting instruction form. If you attend the meeting online, you may vote electronically during the meeting even if you have previously returned your vote in accordance with the foregoing. We appreciate your cooperation.
Important Information about How to Vote
All stockholders may vote their shares over the Internet, by telephone or during the annual meeting by going to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021IRBT2022. If you requested and/or received a printed version of the proxy card, you may also vote by mail. | ● | By Internet (before the Annual Meeting). You may vote at www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will need the 16-digit included in your Notice of Internet Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). Votes submitted through the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard on May 24, 2021. |
| ● | By Telephone. You may vote using a touch-tone telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). Votes submitted by telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard on May 24, 2021. |
| ● | By Mail. If you received printed proxy materials, you may submit your vote by completing, signing and dating each proxy card received and returning it promptly in the prepaid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received no later than by May 24, 2021 to be voted at the annual meeting. |
| ● | During the Annual Meeting. You may vote during the annual meeting by going to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). If you previously voted via the Internet (or by telephone or mail), you will not limit your right to vote online at the annual meeting. |
•By Internet (before the Annual Meeting). You may vote atwww.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). Votes submitted through the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard on May 26, 2022.
•By Telephone. You may vote using a touch-tone telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). Votes submitted by telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard on May 26, 2022.
•By Mail. If you received printed proxy materials, you may submit your vote by completing, signing and dating each proxy card received and returning it promptly in the prepaid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received no later than by May 26, 2022 to be voted at the annual meeting.
•During the Annual Meeting. You may vote during the annual meeting by going towww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2022. You will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). If you previously voted via the Internet (or by telephone or mail), you will not limit your right to vote online at the annual meeting.
If you vote via the Internet or by telephone, your electronic vote authorizes the named proxies in the same manner as if you signed, dated and returned your proxy card. If you vote via the Internet or by telephone, do not return your proxy card.
Participation in the Virtual Annual Meeting
Our
20212022 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting. There is no physical meeting location.
To participate in the virtual meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021IRBT2022 and enter the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). You may begin to log into the meeting platform beginning at 8:15 a.m. Eastern Time on May 25, 2021.27, 2022. The meeting will begin promptly at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time on May 25, 2021.27, 2022.
Stockholders will also have the opportunity to submit questions prior to the annual meeting at www.proxyvote.com by logging on with your control number or during the annual meeting through www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021IRBT2022. by typing your question in the “Ask a Question” field and clicking “Submit.” Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be read and answered during the annual meeting, subject to time constraints. A technical support telephone number will be posted on the log-in page of www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IRBT2021 IRBT2022that you can call if you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or during the meeting.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominees
Our board of directors currently consists of nine members. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation currently divides the board of directors into three classes. One class is elected each year for a term of three years. The board of directors, upon the recommendation of the nominating and corporate governance committee, has nominated Colin M. Angle, Deborah G. Ellinger(i) Mohamad Ali and Eva Manolis,Dr. Ruey-Bin Kao, and recommended that each be elected to the board of directors as a Class III director, each to hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in the year 20242025 or until his successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his earlier death, resignation or removal and (ii) Karen Golz, and recommended that she be elected to the board of directors as a Class III director, to hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in the year 2023 or until her successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. Each of Mr. AngleAli, Dr. Kao and Mses. Ellinger and ManolisMs. Golz has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and has agreed to serve if elected. Michael Bell will not be standing for re-election to the board of directors as a Class II director. Mr. Bell's term on the board of directors will expire at this annual meeting of stockholders. Ms. Golz was initially appointed by the board of directors as a Class III director in November 2021. The board of directors is also composed of (i) three Class III directors (Mohamad Ali, Michael Bell(Colin Angle, Deborah Ellinger and Ruey-Bin Kao)Eva Manolis) whose terms are currently set to expire upon the election and qualification of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 20222024 and (ii) threetwo Class III directors (Elisha Finney, Andrew(Andrew Miller and Michelle V. Stacy) whose terms are currently set to expire upon the election and qualification of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023. If Proposal 4 is approved by the stockholders, each of Mr. Angle and Mses. Ellinger and Manolis, along with all other directors will stand for election at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2022.2023.
The board of directors knows of no reason why any of the nominees named in this Proxy Statement would be unable or for good cause will not serve, but if any nominee should for any reason be unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the board of directors reserves the right to nominate substitute nominees for election prior to the annual meeting, in which case the Company will file an amendment to this Proxy Statement disclosing the identity of such substitute nominees and related information and the proxies will be voted for such substitute nominees. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the nominees named below.
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
The following table sets forth our nominees to be elected at the annual meeting and continuing directors, the positions with us currently held by each nominee and director, the year each nominee’s or director’s current term is currently set to expire and each nominee’s and director’s current class:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nominee’s or Director’s Name | | Position(s) with the Company | | Year Current Term
Will Expire | | Current Class
of Director |
| Nominees for Class III Directors: | | | | | | |
| Mohamad Ali | Lead Independent Director | 2022 | II |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | Director | 2022 | II |
| | | |
| Nominee for Class III Directors: | | | |
Karen Golz(1) | Director | 2023 | III |
| | | |
| Continuing Directors: | | | |
Colin M. Angle | | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | 2021 | 2024 | I |
| Deborah G. Ellinger | | Director | | 2021 | 2024 | I |
| Eva Manolis | | Director | | 2021 | 2024 | I |
| Continuing Directors: | | | | | | |
| Mohamad Ali | | Lead Independent Director | | 2022 | | II |
| Michael Bell | Andrew Miller | Director | | 2022 | | II |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | | Director | | 2022 | | II |
| Andrew Miller | | Director | | 2023 | | III |
| Elisha Finney | Michelle Stacy | Director | | 2023 | | III |
| Michelle V. Stacy | | Director | | 2023 | | III |
| | | | | |
| |
| |
| (1) | Ms. Golz was appointed by the board of directors as a Class III director in November 2021. At the time of the appointment, the board of directors set Ms. Golz's election by the stockholders to occur at the next scheduled annual meeting of stockholders. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
Specific Qualifications, Skills and Experience Required of the Board
The nominating and corporate governance committee believes that certain qualifications, skills and experience should be represented on the board, as described below, although not every member of the board must possess all such qualifications, skills and experience to be considered capable of making valuable contributions to the board.
 | | | | | |
| Our business is complex and evolving rapidly. Our leadership is comprised of individuals who have helped lead public companies or operating business units of significant size and have proven leadership experience in developing and advancing a vision and making executive-level decisions. |
 | | PUBLIC CO. BOARD EXPERIENCE We look for directors who have proven public company board experience, and who have demonstrated a steady hand in representing stockholders’ interests.
|
 | | FINANCE AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Our business and financial model is complex and global in scope. Individuals with financial expertise are able to identify and understand the issues associated with our business and take an analytical approach to capital allocation decisions.
|
 | | GLOBAL OPERATING EXPERIENCE We are a global company, with approximately 57%53% of our Revenuerevenue coming from the Americas, 27%30% from EuropeEMEA and 16%17% from the Asia-Pacific region. Global experience enhances understanding of the complexities and issues associated with running a global business and the challenges we face.
|
 | | GLOBAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS Since 2016, our SALES AND MARKETING
Our business has beenis entirely focused on delivering exceptional consumer products. We benefit from directors who have deep experience with consumer-centric businesses focused on meeting the consumers’ needs.
|
 | DIRECT TO CONSUMER Our strategy involves increasing transactions directly with our consumers, which requires us to communicate effectively with our customers to better understand how they use our products and what other products and services we can provide to increase our revenue per customer. We look for directors who have experience effectively scaling DTC business models. |
| CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY INSIGHT AND TRENDS Our products represent the marriage of consumer convenience with high tech engineering. We look for directors with expertise in and comfort with technology.
|
 | | CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE
We have built a robust Home Knowledge Cloud that supports over-the-air delivery of new digital features and enhanced functionality for customers globally. Additionally, our cloud infrastructure enables us to gain substantial insight into the performance or our robots and is valuable for advancing third-party developer and related product integration activities. We benefit from directors who bring relevant insights into the technical and financial implications of cloud-based connectivity.
|
 | | The largest portion of our employee base is comprised of software engineers and our products can contain more than a million lines of code. Directors that can help steer the Company with issues of agile software development, competitive hiring of software engineers, and alternate business models drawn from the software industry help keep us competitive.
|
 | | Our newest products represent an important part of the Internet of Things and emerging smart home ecosystems. Directors with experience in this area aid in the execution of our corporate strategy.
|
 | | We are a leading consumer robotics company, and our experience in this area enhances our understanding of this nascent industry categorized by deep technical challenges.
|
 | | We believe directors with diverse backgrounds, including gender diversity, provide competing perspectives that enhance our competitiveness.
|
| |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
Over the past six years we have added six independent directors who have further diversified the board in terms of experience, expertise, geographical residency and understanding, and gender. In particular, these new directors have brought relevant, complementary skill sets and insights in disciplines that span global branding, strategic software development, cloud infrastructure, data analytics, consumer business and finance, all of which are critical to our strategy. We continually evaluate our board member skills for alignment with our strategic goals. The following matrix summarizes our directors’ skills that are critical to our success:
Skills Matrix
Skills Matrix | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Board
Members | Public Co.
Leadership
Experience | Public Co.
Board
Experience | Finance and
Capital
Management | Global
Operating
Experience | Global Consumer
Products Sales and Marketing | Direct to Consumer
Technology | Cloud
InfrastructureConsumer Technology Insight and Trends | Software/
SaaSSAAS | Smart
Home | Autonomous Robotics | Diversity |
| Board Members | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mohamad Ali | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Colin Angle | X | X | X | X | X | X | | X | X | X | |
Mohamad Ali | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | | X |
Michael Bell | X | X | X | X | X | X | | X | X | | |
Deborah G. Ellinger | X | X | X | X | X | X | | | | | X |
Elisha FinneyKaren Golz | X | X | X | X | | X | | X | | | X |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | | X |
| Eva Manolis | X | X | | X | X | X | | | X | | X |
| Andrew Miller | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | | |
| Michelle Stacy | X | X | X | X | X | X | | | | | X |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
7
Board Diversity Matrix (As of February 21, 2022)
We believe directors with diverse backgrounds, including gender diversity, provide competing perspectives that enhance our competitiveness. The following table sets forth information on the voluntarily self-identified diversity characteristics of the members of our board of directors:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Number of Directors | | | 9 | | |
| | | | | |
| Female | Male | | Non-Binary | Did Not Disclose Gender |
| | | | | |
| Part I: Gender Identity | | | | | |
| Directors | 4 | 5 | | - | - |
| Part II: Demographic Background | | | | | |
| African American or Black | - | - | | - | - |
| Alaskan Native or Native American | - | - | | - | - |
| Asian | - | 2 | | - | - |
| Hispanic or Latinx | - | - | | - | - |
| Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | - | - | | - | - |
| White | 4 | 3 | | - | - |
| Two or More Races or Ethnicities | - | - | | - | - |
| LGBTQ+ | | | - | | |
| Did Not Disclose Demographic Background | | | - | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Board and Governance Information |
| 9 | Size of Board | | ✓ | Annual Election of Directors(1) |
| 8 | Number of Independent Directors | | ✓ | Proxy Access |
5860 | Average Age of Directors | | ✓ | Majority Voting for Directors |
| 8 | Board Meetings Held in Fiscal 20202021 | | ✓ | No Supermajority Voting Requirements(1) |
56 | Average Tenure of Independent Directors (in years) |
✓ | Annual Election of Directors* |
✓ | Proxy Access |
✓ | Majority Voting for Directors |
✓ | No Supermajority Voting Requirements* |
✓ | Lead Independent Director |
| | | ✓ | Independent Directors Meet Without Management Present |
| | | ✓ | Director Stock Ownership Guidelines |
| | | ✓ | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees |
| | | ✓ | Director Self-Evaluation Program |
* | | | | | |
| (1) | The Company is seeking stockholder approval at the 20212022 Annual Meeting to declassify its board of directors and eliminate supermajority voting requirements in its governing documentsdocuments. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement 8
Director Nominees Class II
8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Mohamad Ali DIRECTOR SINCE: 2015 AGE: 51 Lead Independent Director | | |
| | iRobot Committees: •Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | | Public Directorships: •Henry Schein (since February 2021) •Carbonite, Inc. (former) (from December 2014 to July 2019) |
| | |
Mohamad Ali has served as a director since August 2015 and brings extensive experience with capital allocation in technology companies, as well as strategic software development, including cloud infrastructure and data analytics. Mr. Ali became chief executive officer and a director of International Data Group, Inc. (IDG), the world’s leading technology media, events and research company, in August 2019. Prior to this, he served as the president, chief executive officer and director of Carbonite, Inc., a global leader in data protection, since 2014. Mr. Ali successfully led Carbonite’s continued growth, serving the ever-evolving technology needs of small and midsize businesses and consumers. Previously, Mr. Ali served as chief strategy officer at Hewlett-Packard, a manufacturer of computers and enterprise products, from 2012 to 2014 and president of Avaya Global Services, an enterprise communications company. He also served in senior leadership roles at IBM Corporation, a multinational technology and consulting company, where he acquired numerous companies to build IBM’s analytics and big data business. Mr. Ali is a director of Henry Schein (Nasdaq: HSIC), the world’s largest provider of health care solutions to office-based dental and medical practitioners, as well as Oxfam America, Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council and the WGBH Educational Foundation, each a nonprofit entity and previously served on the board of directors of Carbonite, Inc., City National Corporation and City National Bank. The Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council recognized Mr. Ali as “CEO of the Year” in 2018 and he was named to the Boston Business Journal’s 2008 “40 Under 40” list. Mohamad holds a B.S. and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering, both from Stanford University.
Director Nominees |
| Colin Angle
DIRECTOR SINCE: 1992
AGE: 53
Chairman, CEO and Founder
| |
 | iRobot Committees:
● None
|
Colin M. Angle, a co-founder of iRobot, has served as chairman of the board since October 2008, as chief executive officer since June 1997, and prior to that, as our president since November 1992. He has served as a director since October 1992. Mr. Angle previously worked at the National Aeronautical and Space Administration’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory where he participated in the design of the behavior controlled rovers that led to Sojourner exploring Mars in 1997. He is a director of Ixcela, Inc., a private company. Mr. Angle holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and an M.S. in Computer Science, both from MIT. |
Experience and Qualifications
As a co-founder and chief executive officer, Mr. Angle provides a critical contribution to the board of directors with his detailed knowledge of the Company, our employees, our client base, our prospects, the strategic marketplace and our competitors.
|
| |
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Ali brings extensive experience with capital allocation in technology companies, as well as strategic software development, including cloud infrastructure and data analytics.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement 9
9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Dr. Ruey-Bin Kao DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018 AGE: 61 Director | | |
| | iRobot Committees: •Compensation and Talent Committee | | Public Directorships: •Want Want China Holdings Ltd. (former) (from 2011 to July 2018) •Autohome, Inc. (former) (from February 2014 to June 2016) |
| | |
Dr. Ruey-Bin Kao has served as a director since June 2018. He has more than 36 years of expertise in technology, telecommunication, corporate governance, and consumer business. Dr. Kao has held senior leadership roles, driving revenue growth and profitability, at numerous global companies, including Telstra Corporation Ltd. (“Telstra”) (Chief Executive Officer, Greater China), Applied Materials China (President, China), China Hewlett-Packard Co. Ltd (China Managing Director/General Manager of Enterprise Business), Motorola, Inc. (China Chairman / President) and AT&T Bell Laboratories (Business and Product Marketing Manager). Most recently, from January 2014 to December 2017, Dr. Kao served as the Chief Executive Officer, Greater China, at Telstra, Australia’s leading telecommunications and technology company, where his management responsibilities included building strategic partnerships to enhance the company’s brand, as well as developing and executing an effective growth strategy by identifying areas of potential in the rapidly evolving Greater China market. Dr. Kao was formerly a director of China Telecommunications Corporation, China National Travel Services Group Corporation Ltd. and Shenhua Group Corporation Ltd. (now known as China Energy Investment Corporation Ltd.). Dr. Kao holds a bachelor degree in Computer Science from Tamkang University, master’s degree in Computer and Information Science from the University of Delaware and a doctorate degree of Business Administration from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
 | Deborah G. Ellinger
| |
|
Experience and Qualifications
Dr. Kao has deep experience as an executive in high-tech companies and in international operations, particularly in China, through his work with Telstra, Applied Materials, China Hewlett-Package and Motorola, and extensive experience in telecommunication, corporate governance, and consumer business.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
10
Director Nominees Class III
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Karen Golz DIRECTOR SINCE: 2011 2021 Director | | |
| | ●•Audit Committee
| | Public Directorships: •Aspen Technology, Inc. (since March 2021) •Analog Devices, Inc. (since June 2018)
|
| | | | |
Karen M. Golz is a retired partner from Ernst & Young ("EY"), a public accounting firm, where she held various senior leadership positions during her tenure at the firm, including most recently as Global Vice Chair, Japan from July 2016 to June 2017, and prior thereto, from July 2010 to June 2016, as Global Vice Chair, Professional Practice. Ms. Golz also served on EY’s Global Risk Management Executive Committee, which was charged with risk management across EY’s global network, from 2008 to 2016. Ms. Golz currently serves as senior advisor to The Boston Consulting Group’s Audit and Risk Committee, a role she has held since August 2017, and as a principal for K.M. Golz Associates, LLC, a consulting services company, since August 2017. She also sits on the Board of Directors of the University of Illinois Foundation. Ms. Golz is also a National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Board Leadership Fellow. She holds a B.S. in Accountancy, summa cum laude, from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and is a certified public accountant.
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Golz has accounting, auditing, and risk management expertise and extensive experience helping global organizations successfully navigate the complexities of international trade and regulation.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
11
Continuing Directors
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Colin Angle DIRECTOR SINCE: 1992 AGE: 54 Chairman, CEO and Founder |
| | | iRobot Committees: •None |
| | | |
Colin Angle, a co-founder of iRobot, has served as chairman of the board since October 2008, as chief executive officer since June 1997, and prior to that, as our president since November 1992. He has served as a director since October 1992. Mr. Angle previously worked at the National Aeronautical and Space Administration’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, where he participated in the design of the behavior controlled rovers that led to Sojourner exploring Mars in 1997. He is a director of Ixcela, Inc., a private company. Mr. Angle holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and an M.S. in Computer Science, both from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ("MIT").
Experience and Qualifications
As a co-founder and chief executive officer, Mr. Angle provides a critical contribution to the board of directors with his detailed knowledge of the Company, our employees, our client base, our prospects, the strategic marketplace and our competitors.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Deborah G. Ellinger DIRECTOR SINCE: 2011 AGE: 63 Director | | |
| | iRobot Committees: •Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |  | •Tupperware Brands Corporation (since March 2021)●
•Covetrus, Inc. (since February 2019)●
•Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (former) (from February 2015 to May 2017) |
Deborah G. Ellinger has served as a director since November 2011. Ms. Ellinger is also a director of Tupperware Brands Corporation (NYSE: TUP), a leading global consumer products company, and Covetrus, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVET), a $4 billion tech-enabled veterinarian services and supply company, and is a senior advisor to the Boston Consulting Group. She was the president and CEO of Ideal Image, a chain of 130 medical spas providing non-surgical cosmetic procedures across the US and Canada, from 2016 until her retirement in March 2018; chairman and chief executive officer of The Princeton Review, a company which assists students globally in test preparation and tutoring, from 2012 to 2014; president of Restoration Hardware, a luxury home furnishings retailer, from 2008 to 2009; and chief executive officer of Wellness Pet Food, a natural pet-food company, from 2004 to 2008. Ms. Ellinger led each of those companies while they were owned by two private equity firms, and three of the four transitioned to new ownership, yielding three to seven times return on capital to investors. Previously, she served as an executive vice president at CVS Pharmacy, a senior vice president at Staples, and a partner at The Boston Consulting Group, and began her career with Mellon Financial Corporation. Ms. Ellinger also serves on the board of the WomenCorporateDirectors Foundation, a nonprofit entity, and is a former director of Interpublic Group, The Princeton Review, Sealy Corporation, National Life Group, and several other private companies. Her assignments have taken her all over the world; she has lived and worked in Europe, Asia, and America. Ms. Ellinger is qualified as a Barrister-at-Law in London, as a member of the Inner Temple. She holds an M.A. and B.A. in Law and Mathematics from the University of Cambridge, England. | | |
| | |
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Ellinger is a former CEO with extensive global board experience. Her background is in consumer products and services, technology and digitalization, and she has significant experience in M&A, private equity investment, activist investor engagement, board governance and women’s leadership. She was recognized by the National Association of Corporate Directors as a Top 100 Director in 2019.
|
Deborah G. Ellinger has served as a director since November 2011. Ms. Ellinger is also a director of Tupperware Brands Corporation (NYSE: TUP), a leading global consumer products company, and Covetrus, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVET), a $4 billion tech-enabled veterinarian services and supply company, and is a senior advisor to the Boston Consulting Group. She was the president and CEO of Ideal Image, a chain of 130 medical spas providing non-surgical cosmetic procedures across the US and Canada, from 2016 until her retirement in March 2018; chairman and chief executive officer of The Princeton Review, a company which assists students globally in test preparation and tutoring, from 2012 to 2014; president of Restoration Hardware, a luxury home furnishings retailer, from 2008 to 2009; and chief executive officer of Wellness Pet Food, a natural pet-food company, from 2004 to 2008. Ms. Ellinger led each of those companies while they were owned by two private equity firms, and three of the four transitioned to new ownership, yielding three to seven times return on capital to investors. Previously, she served as an executive vice president at CVS Pharmacy, a senior vice president at Staples, and a partner at The Boston Consulting Group, and began her career with Mellon Financial Corporation. Ms. Ellinger also serves on the board of the WomenCorporateDirectors Foundation, a nonprofit entity, and is a former director of Interpublic Group, The Princeton Review, Sealy Corporation, National Life Group, and several other private companies. Her assignments have taken her all over the world; she has lived and worked in Europe, Asia, and America. Ms. Ellinger is qualified as a Barrister-at-Law in London, as a member of the Inner Temple. She holds an M.A. and B.A. in Law and Mathematics from the University of Cambridge, England.
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Ellinger is a former CEO with extensive global board experience. Her background is in consumer products and services, technology and digitalization, and she has significant experience in M&A, private equity investment, activist investor engagement, board governance and women’s leadership. She was recognized by the National Association of Corporate Directors as a Top 100 Director in 2019.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
 | | Director | | |
| | | | | •Fair Isaac Corporation (since April 2018)●
•Shutterfly, Inc. (former) (from October 2016
to September 2019) |
Eva Manolis has served as a director since July 2019. She brings more than 30 years of product development and global ecommerce experience within the consumer technology space to the iRobot board. Eva served in a variety of executive roles at Amazon.com, Inc. from 2005 through 2016 where she was successful in developing and growing customer adoption of technologies, products, programs and services across a variety of categories including consumer electronics. Most recently, Eva served as vice president of consumer shopping at Amazon.com, Inc. from 2010 until 2016 with responsibility for worldwide innovative shopping experiences, including the development of features and services for the company’s mobile app and website on a global scale. Prior to that, Eva served as vice president of web and mobile retail applications from 2008 to 2010 and vice president of global retail applications from 2005 to 2008. Eva also founded Shutterfly, Inc. in 1999 and served as executive vice president of products, services and strategy until 2002. At Shutterfly, she was responsible for the vision, architecture, design and development of the company’s website from inception to profitability. In addition to her service on the iRobot board of directors, she also currently serves on the board of directors at Fair Isaac Corporation and previously served on the board of directors at Shutterfly, Inc. | | | |
| | |
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Manolis brings more than 30 years of product development and global ecommerce experience within the consumer technology space to iRobot.
|
Eva Manolis has served as a director since July 2019. She brings more than 30 years of product development and global ecommerce experience within the consumer technology space to the iRobot board. Ms. Manolis served in a variety of executive roles at Amazon.com, Inc. from 2005 through 2016, where she was successful in developing and growing customer adoption of technologies, products, programs and services across a variety of categories including consumer electronics. Most recently, Ms. Manolis served as vice president of consumer shopping at Amazon.com, Inc. from 2010 until 2016 with responsibility for worldwide innovative shopping experiences, including the development of features and services for the company’s mobile app and website on a global scale. Prior to that, Ms. Manolis served as vice president of web and mobile retail applications from 2008 to 2010 and vice president of global retail applications from 2005 to 2008. Ms. Manolis also founded Shutterfly, Inc. in 1999 and served as executive vice president of products, services and strategy until 2002. At Shutterfly, she was responsible for the vision, architecture, design and development of the company’s website from inception to profitability. In addition to her service on the iRobot board of directors, she also currently serves on the board of directors at Fair Isaac Corporation and previously served on the board of directors at Shutterfly, Inc.
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Manolis brings more than 30 years of product development and global ecommerce experience within the consumer technology space to iRobot.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
Continuing Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
 | Mohamad Ali
Andrew Miller AGE: 5061Lead Independent
| | |
| •Chair of Audit Committee •Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | | Public Directorships: ● Henry Schein
• Verint Systems (since February 2021)● Carbonite, Inc. (former) (from
December 2014 to July 2019)
• Vontier Corporation (since October 2020) |
Mohamad Ali has served as a director since August 2015 and brings extensive experience with capital allocation in technology companies, as well as strategic software development, including cloud infrastructure and data analytics. Mohamad became chief executive officer and a director of International Data Group, Inc. (IDG), the world’s leading technology media, events and research company, in August 2019. Prior to this, he served as the president, chief executive officer and director of Carbonite, Inc., a global leader in data protection, since 2014. Mohamad successfully led Carbonite’s continued growth, serving the ever-evolving technology needs of small and midsize businesses and consumers. Previously, Mohamad served as chief strategy officer at Hewlett-Packard, a manufacturer of computers and enterprise products, from 2012 to 2014 and president of Avaya Global Services, an enterprise communications company. He also served in senior leadership roles at IBM Corporation, a multinational technology and consulting company, where he acquired numerous companies to build IBM’s analytics and big data business. Mohamad is a director of Henry Schein (Nasdaq: HSIC), the world’s largest provider of health care solutions to office-based dental and medical practitioners, as well as Oxfam America, Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council and the WGBH Educational Foundation, each a nonprofit entity and previously served on the board of directors of Carbonite, Inc, City National Corporation and City National Bank. The Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council recognized Mohamad as “CEO of the Year” in 2018 and he was named to the Boston Business Journal’s 2008 “40 Under 40” list. Mohamad holds a B.S. and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering, both from Stanford University. | |
| | |
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Ali brings extensive experience with capital allocation in technology companies, as well as strategic software development, including cloud infrastructure and data analytics.
|
Andrew Miller has served as a director since September 2016 and brings critical financial leadership as well as software, cloud infrastructure and Internet of Things ("IoT") experience to iRobot as the Company continues to grow its consumer business globally and focus on the connected home. Mr. Miller most recently served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of PTC, a provider of software technology platforms and solutions, from early 2015 until May 2019. At PTC, he was responsible for global finance, tax and treasury, investor relations, information technology, pricing, corporate real estate, and customer administration. From 2008 to 2015, Mr. Miller served as chief financial officer of Cepheid, a high-growth molecular diagnostics company, where he built world-class finance and information technology teams and a nationally recognized investor relations program. Mr. Miller has also served in financial leadership roles at Autodesk, MarketFirst Software, Cadence Design Systems, and Silicon Graphics. In addition to his service on the iRobot board of directors, Mr. Miller serves as a director on the board of Verint Systems (Nasdaq: VRNT), a global software and cloud provider of actionable intelligence solutions, where he is a member of the board’s audit committee. Mr. Miller also serves on the board of Vontier Corporation (NYSE: VNT), a global industrial technology company focused on smarter transportation and mobility, where he is chair of the audit committee and a member of the compensation committee. He is also a former director of United Online, where he chaired the audit committee and served on the compensation committee. Mr. Miller holds a B.S. in Commerce with an emphasis in Accounting from Santa Clara University and was a CPA.
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Miller brings critical financial leadership as well as software, cloud infrastructure and IoT experience to iRobot as the Company continues to grow its consumer business globally and focus on the connected home.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement 15
12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Michelle Stacy DIRECTOR SINCE: 2014 AGE: 66 Director | | |
| | iRobot Committees: •Chair of Compensation and Talent Committee | | Public Directorships: •Flex Pharma, Inc. (former) (from March 2016 to July 2019) |
| | |
Michelle V. Stacy has served as a director since August 2014. During her five-year tenure as president at Keurig Inc., a division of Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., from 2008 to 2013, the company’s revenue grew from $493 million in 2008 to $4.3 billion in 2013. Ms. Stacy has also served as lead executive director of Coravin, Inc. and a director of LCP Edge Holdco, LLC (Hydrafacial), Young Innovations Inc., Flex Pharma and Tervis Inc. Ms. Stacy currently serves on the board of Bellwether Coffee Co. Ms. Stacy is a recognized expert on identifying strategies to successfully build top line growth for global brands. She holds a B.S. from Dartmouth College and an M.S. in Management from J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management — Northwestern University, and is bilingual in French and English.
 | Michael Bell
DIRECTOR SINCE: 2016
AGE: 54
Director
| |
| iRobot Committees:
● Chair of the Compensation and Talent Committee
| | Public Directorships:
● Silver Spring Networks, Inc. (former) (from
September 2015 to January 2018)
|
Michael Bell has served as a director since March 2016. In March 2021, Mr. Bell became the senior vice president of digital at Lucid Motors USA, Inc., an electric vehicle company. Mr. Bell served as chief technology officer of Michigan based electric vehicle startup Rivian from June 2019 until February 2020. Prior to this, he was the chief executive officer and president of Silver Spring Networks, a leading networking platform and solutions provider for smart energy networks, since September 2015 until his retirement in January 2018. Previously, from 2010 to 2015, he held various roles at Intel Corporation, a multinational technology corporation specializing in the production of semiconductor chips, including Corporate Vice President New Devices Group, Corporate VP Mobile and Communications Group and Corporate Vice President Ultra Mobility Group. He was head of Product Development at Palm, Inc. from 2007 to 2010. He worked at Apple, Inc. from 1991 to 2007 and played significant roles in development of Apple iPhone and Apple TV products, serving as Vice President, CPU Software from 2002 to 2007. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania. |
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Bell brings significant expertise in the Internet of Things from his work at Silver Spring Networks, Inc., Intel Corporation, Apple, Inc., and Palm, Inc.
|
| |
Experience and Qualifications
As the former president of Keurig, Inc. and former vice president and general manager with Gillette/Procter & Gamble Co., Ms. Stacy brings to the board of directors a wealth of experience leading consumer-focused, high-growth businesses and building global brands.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement | Dr. Ruey-Bin Kao
DIRECTOR SINCE: 2018
AGE: 60
Director
| |
| iRobot Committees:
● Compensation and Talent Committee
| | Public Directorships:
● Want Want China Holdings Ltd. (former)
(from 2011 to July 2018)
● Autohome, Inc. (former) (from
February 2014 to June 2016)
|
Dr. Ruey-Bin Kao has served as a director since June 2018. He has more than 35 years of expertise in technology, telecommunication, corporate governance, and consumer business. Dr. Kao has held senior leadership roles, driving revenue growth and profitability, at numerous global companies, including Telstra Corporation Ltd. (“Telstra”) (Chief Executive Officer, Greater China), Applied Materials China (President, China), China Hewlett- Packard Co. Ltd (China Managing Director/General Manager of Enterprise Business), Motorola, Inc. (China Chairman / President) and AT&T Bell Laboratories (Business and Product Marketing Manager). Most recently, from January 2014 to December 2017, Dr. Kao served as the Chief Executive Officer, Greater China, at Telstra, Australia’s leading telecommunications and technology company, where his management responsibilities included building strategic partnerships to enhance the company’s brand, as well as developing and executing an effective growth strategy by identifying areas of potential in the rapidly evolving Greater China market. Dr. Kao was formerly a director of China Telecommunications Corporation, China National Travel Services Group Corporation Ltd. and Shenhua Group Corporation Ltd. (now known as China Energy Investment Corporation Ltd.). Dr. Kao holds a bachelor degree in Computer Science from Tamkang University, master’s degree in Computer and Information Science from the University of Delaware and a doctorate degree of Business Administration from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. |
Experience and Qualifications
Dr. Kao has deep experience as an executive in high-tech companies and in international operations, particularly in China, through his work with Telstra Corporation, Applied Materials, China Hewlett-Package and Motorola, and extensive experience in telecommunication, corporate governance, and consumer business.
|
| | | | |
NoticeTable of Annual Meeting of StockholdersContents and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement | Andrew Miller
DIRECTOR SINCE: 2016
AGE: 59
Director
| |
| iRobot Committees:
● Chair of Audit Committee
● Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
| | Public Directorships:
● Verint Systems (since December 2019)
● Vontier Corporation (since October 2020)
|
Andrew Miller has served as a director since September 2016 and brings critical financial leadership as well as software, cloud infrastructure and Internet of Things (IoT) experience to iRobot as the Company continues to grow its consumer business globally and focus on the connected home. Mr. Miller most recently served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of PTC, a provider of software technology platforms and solutions, from early 2015 until May 2019. At PTC, he was responsible for global finance, tax and treasury, investor relations, information technology, pricing, corporate real estate, and customer administration. From 2008 to 2015, Mr. Miller served as chief financial officer of Cepheid, a high-growth molecular diagnostics company, where he built world-class finance and information technology teams and a nationally recognized investor relations program. Mr. Miller has also served in financial leadership roles at Autodesk, MarketFirst Software, Cadence Design Systems, and Silicon Graphics. In addition to his service on the iRobot board of directors, Mr. Miller serves as a director on the board of Verint Systems (Nasdaq: VRNT), a global software and cloud provider of actionable intelligence solutions, where he is a member of the board’s audit committee. Mr Miller also serves on the board of Vontier Corporation (NYSE: VNT), a global industrial technology company focused on smarter transportation and mobility, where he is chair of the audit committee and a member of the compensation committee. He is also a former director of United Online, where he chaired the audit committee and served on the compensation committee. Mr. Miller holds a B.S. in Commerce with an emphasis in Accounting from Santa Clara University and was a CPA.
|
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Miller brings critical financial leadership as well as software, cloud infrastructure and Internet of Things (IoT) experience to iRobot as the Company continues to grow its consumer business globally and focus on the connected home.
|
| | | | |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
 | Elisha Finney
DIRECTOR SINCE: 2017
AGE: 59
Director
| |
| iRobot Committees:
● Audit Committee
● Compensation and Talent Committee
| | Public Directorships:
● Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (since
November 2017)
● NanoString Technologies, Inc. (since
May 2017)
● ICU Medical, Inc. (since January 2016)
● Cutera, Inc. (former) (from October 2017 to
May 2019)
|
Elisha Finney has served as a director since January 2017. Until her retirement in May 2017, she served as executive vice president and CFO of Varian Medical Systems since 1999, a leading developer of radiation oncology treatments and software, where she served in various management roles since 1988. Ms. Finney’s management responsibilities included corporate accounting; corporate communications and investor relations; internal financial and compliance audit; risk management; tax and treasury, and information technology. She previously served as a board member at Altera Corporation from 2011 to December 2015, Thoratec Corporation from 2007 to 2013, and Laserscope from 2005 to 2006. She holds a B.A. in Risk Management and Insurance from the University of Georgia and an M.B.A. from Golden Gate University where she received the 1992 “Outstanding Graduate of the Masters Programs in Finance” Award. Ms. Finney was the 2015 UGA Terry College of Business Distinguished Alumni of the Year and the recipient of Silicon Valley Business Journal’s 2013 “Women of Influence” Award. |
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Finney brings more than 25 years of financial and technology-related expertise to iRobot as the Company focuses on expanding internationally, scaling its connected product line and maximizing value for its stockholders.
|
| | | | |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
 | Michelle V. Stacy
DIRECTOR SINCE: 2014
AGE: 65
Director
| |
| iRobot Committees:
● Compensation and Talent
Committee
| | Public Directorships:
● Flex Pharma, Inc. (former) (from
March 2016 to July 2019)
|
Michelle V. Stacy has served as a director since August 2014. During her five-year tenure as president at Keurig Inc., a division of Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., from 2008 to 2013, the company’s revenue grew from $493 million in 2008 to $4.3 billion for 2013. Ms. Stacy has also served as lead executive director of Coravin, Inc. and a director of LCP Edge Holdco, LLC (Hydrafacial), Young Innovations Inc., Flex Pharma and Tervis Inc. Ms. Stacy currently serves on the board of Bellwether Coffee Co. Ms. Stacy is a recognized expert on identifying strategies to successfully build top line growth for global brands. She holds a B.S. from Dartmouth College and an M.S. in Management from J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management — Northwestern University, and is bilingual in French and English. |
Experience and Qualifications
As the former president of Keurig, Inc. and former vice president and general manager with Gillette/Procter & Gamble Co., Ms. Stacy brings to the board of directors a wealth of experience leading consumer-focused, high-growth businesses and building global brands.
|
| | | | |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
The Board of Directors and Its Committees
Board of Directors
The board of directors met eight (8) times during the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021,1, 2022, and took action by unanimous written consent four (4)three (3) times. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the board of directors and the total number of meetings of all committees of the board of directors on which he or she served during fiscal 2020.2021. The board of directors has the following standing committees: audit committee; compensation and talent committee and nominating and corporate governance committee, each of which operates pursuant to a separate charter that has been approved by the board of directors. A current copy of each charter is available within the Corporate Governance section of our website at https://investor.irobot.com/corporate-governance/highlights. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this Proxy Statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC. Each committee reviews the appropriateness of its charter at least annually and retains the authority to engage its own advisors and consultants. The composition and responsibilities of each committee are summarized below.
Board Committees
Below is a summary of our committee structure and membership information.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Audit
Committee | Compensation and
Talent Committee | Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee |
| | | |
| Mohamad Ali | | | |
Michael Bell* | | | |
| Deborah Ellinger | | | |
Karen Golz  | | | |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | | | |
| Eva Manolis | | | |
Andrew Miller | | | |
| Michelle Stacy | | | |
| | | | | |
| * | Mr. Bell will not be standing for re-election to the board of directors. Mr. Bell's term on the compensation and talent committee will expire at this annual meeting of stockholders. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
| Audit Committee | Met 98 times in 20202021 |
Committee Chair
Andrew Miller
| Responsibilities | | |
Committee Chair Andrew Miller | Responsibilities | | |
| •Appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; •Pre-approving auditing and permissible non-audit services (including certain tax compliance, planning and advice services), and the terms of such services, to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm; •Reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures; •Coordinating the oversight and reviewing the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting; •Overseeing the performance of our internal auditors and internal audit functions, including reviewing the annual internal audit risk assessment as well as the scope of, and overall plans for, the annual internal audit program; •Establishing policies and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting related complaints and concerns; •Reviewing and discussing with management risk assessments and risk management, including cyber security; •Overseeing our compliance with certain legal and regulatory requirements including, but not limited to, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; •Preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules to be included in our annual proxy statement; •Reviewing certain relationships and related transactions; and •Such other matters as the committee deems appropriate. For additional information concerning the audit committee, see the “Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.”
The audit committee took action by unanimous written consent one (1) time during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2022. |
| | | |
Committee Members
Elisha Finney | Independence and Financial Expertise |
| Karen Golz | Each member of the audit committee of the board of directors is an independent director within the meaning of the director independence standards of Nasdaq and the SEC, including Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In addition, the board of directors has determined that each of Mr. Miller, Ms. FinneyGolz and Ms. Manolis are financially literate and that Mr. Miller and Ms. FinneyGolz each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the rules of the SEC. |
|
| Eva Manolis | | | |
| |
| | | |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
| Compensation and Talent Committee | Met 64 times in 20202021 |
Committee Chair
Michael Bell
| Responsibilities | | |
Committee Chair Michelle Stacy | Responsibilities | |
|
| •Annually reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers; •Evaluating the performance of our chief executive officer in light of such corporate goals and objectives and determining the compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers;officers based on such evaluation; •Reviewing and recommending to the board of directors for approval the compensation of our chief executive officer; •Overseeing and administering our compensation, welfare, benefit and pension plans and similar plans; •ReviewingReviewing and making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to director compensation; •Reviewing and making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to succession planning for senior management; •Reviewing the Company’sCompany's programs related to diversity and inclusion; •Retaining and approving the compensation of any compensation advisers; and •Evaluating the independence of any such compensation advisers.advisers; •Overseeing the Company’s efforts to promote diversity and inclusion in the workforce; and •Overseeing the management’s efforts to foster a company culture aligned with the Company’s values and strategy.
The compensation and talent committee took action by unanimous written consent five (5) times during the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021.1, 2022. |
| | | |
Committee Members
Elisha Finney | Independence |
Michael Bell* | Each member of the compensation and talent committee of the board of directors is an independent director within the meaning of the director independence standards of Nasdaq and a non-employee director as defined in Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and an outside director pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).Act. |
|
| Ruey-Bin Kao |
| | | |
| | | | | |
Michelle V. Stacy* | | | |
| | | |
| | | Mr. Bell will not be standing for re-election to the board of directors. Mr. Bell's term on the compensation and talent committee will expire at this annual meeting of stockholders. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
| Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | Met 4 times in 2021 |
Committee Chair
Deborah G. Ellinger
| Responsibilities | | Met 3 times in 2020 |
Committee Chair Deborah Ellinger | Responsibilities | | |
| •Developing and recommending to the board a set of corporate governance principles and best practices, including considering the adequacy of the by-laws and certificate of incorporation for consideration by stockholders; •Evaluating, monitoring and recommending to the board corporationcorporate governance policies, including a code of business conduct and ethics and a set of corporate governance guidelines; •Overseeing the annual evaluation of the board, the committees of the board and management; •Developing and recommending to the board criteria for board and committee membership; •Establishing procedures for identifying and evaluating director candidates including nominees recommended by stockholders; •Overseeing the Company’s environment,Company's environmental, social and governance (“ESG”("ESG") programs, including assessing the Company’sCompany's performance against ESG metrics and reviewing ESG disclosures; •• Coordinating continuing education for directors on topics that will assist them in discharging their duties;
•Identifying individuals qualified to become board members; and •Recommending to the board the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to each of the board’s committees.
The nominating and corporate governance committee took action by unanimous written consent one (1) time during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2022. |
| | | |
Committee Members
Mohamad Ali | Independence |
| Mohamad Ali | Each member of the nominating and corporate governance committee of the board of directors is an independent director within the meaning of the director independence standards of Nasdaq and applicable rules of the SEC. |
|
| Andrew Miller | | | |
| | | |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the director nominees to be elected at the annual meeting, the continuing directors, the executive officers of the Company and individuals chosen to be executive officers of the Company, their ages immediately prior to the annual meeting, and the positions currently held by each such person with the Company:
Name | | Age | | | | | | |
| Name | Age | Position |
Colin M. Angle | | 53 | 54 | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Mohamad Ali (3)Ali(3) | | 50 | 51 | Lead Independent Director |
Michael Bell (1)Deborah Ellinger(3) | | 54 | 63 | Director |
Deborah G. Ellinger (3)Karen Golz(2) | | 62 | | Director |
Elisha Finney (1)(2) | | 59 | 68 | Director |
Ruey-Bin Kao (1)Kao(1) | | 60 | 61 | Director |
Eva Manolis (2)Manolis(2) | | 57 | 58 | Director |
Andrew Miller (2)Miller(2)(3) | | 59 | 61 | Director |
Michelle V. Stacy (1)Stacy(1) | | 65 | 66 | Director |
| Jean Jacques Blanc | 57 | Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer |
Russell J. Campanello | | 65 | 66 | Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Communications |
| Faris Habbaba | 62 | Executive Vice President, Chief Research and Development Officer |
| Keith Hartsfield | | 50 | 51 | Executive Vice President, Chief Product Officer |
Glen D. Weinstein | | 50 | 51 | Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer |
| Julie Zeiler | | 55 | 56 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | | |
| |
| (1) | Member of the compensation and talent committee |
| (2) | Member of the audit committee |
| (3) | Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee |
Executive Officers
Jean Jacques Blanc has served as our executive vice president, chief commercial officer since February 2020 and is responsible for leading our global go-to market commercial strategy. Mr. Blanc previously served as our vice president and general manager of EMEA from March 2017 to February 2020 and as our vice president sales and Marketing EMEA from April 2014 to February 2017. Prior to joining iRobot, Mr. Blanc held leadership roles in commercial management at Whirlpool Corporation, including general manager, France and vice president of sales, North West Europe. Earlier in his career, he held commercial roles at Phillips. Mr. Blanc graduated from Institut Superieur du Commerce in Paris, France.
Russell J. Campanello has served as our executive vice president, human resources and corporate communications since February 2014. Mr. Campanello previously served as our senior vice president, human resources and corporate communications from July 2013 until February 2014. From November 2010 until July 2013, Mr. Campanello served as our senior vice president, human resources. Prior to joining iRobot, Mr. Campanello served as senior vice president, human resources and administration at Phase Forward, Inc. from April 2008 until September 2010. Mr. Campanello previously served as senior vice president of human resources and marketing at Keane, Inc., a business process and information technology consulting firm, from September 2003 to October 2007. Prior to Keane, Mr. Campanello served as chief people officer at NerveWire, Inc. from August 2000 to February 2003. Prior to NerveWire, he served as senior vice president, human resources at Genzyme Corp. from November 1997 to July 2000. Earlier in his career, Mr. Campanello spent nine years as vice president of human resources at Lotus Development Corporation. He holds a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Massachusetts.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
21
Faris Habbaba has served as our chief research and development officer since June 2021 and is responsible for driving technology development and advanced research to support product roadmaps. Prior to joining iRobot, Mr. Habbaba served as vice president of engineering at Zebra Technologies, a mobile computing company, from January 2016 to June 2021 where he managed a global team of more than 1,000 software and hardware engineers. Earlier in his career, Mr. Habbaba held engineering, supply chain, product management and business leadership roles at Motorola Solutions, Inc. Mr. Habbaba holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Florida and has been awarded more than a dozen U.S. and international patents.
Keith Hartsfieldhas served as our executive vice president and chief product officer since September 2019. Prior to joining iRobot, Mr. Hartsfield served in multiple executive roles at HP, Inc., a multinational information technology company, from 2014 to 2019, including vice president of the Z workstation products, vice president of mobility products and workflow transformation, and vice president of mobility products. Prior to his time with HP, he served as chief operating officer for Green Edge Technologies, an “Internet of things” (“IoT”)IoT startup focused on energy management and homeNotice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
automation. Earlier in his career, Mr. Hartsfield held a variety of executive roles with Motorola and Nokia. Mr. Hartsfield holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University, a M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics from Case Western Reserve University and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Hartsfield has been awarded several U.S. patents.
Glen D. Weinstein has served as our executive vice president and chief legal officer since August 2012. Mr. Weinstein previously served as our general counsel from July 2000 to August 2012 and as senior vice president from January 2005 to August 2012. He has also served as our secretary since March 2004. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Weinstein was with Covington & Burling LLP, a law firm in Washington, D.C. Mr. Weinstein holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law.
Julie Zeiler has served as our executive vice president and chief financial officer since May 2020, overseeing the Company’s financial operations, investor relations facilities and ITfacilities organizations. Prior to being appointed chief financial officer, Ms. Zeiler served as the Company’s vice president of finance since joining the Company in January 2017. In this position, she led the Company’s financial planning and analysis, and treasury functions. Prior to joining iRobot, Ms. Zeiler served in a number of senior financial leadership positions at Boston Scientific Corporation from 1996 to 2017 that included its global operations, European business and major product lines. In addition, her experience includes financial management roles at Digital Equipment Corporation from 1987 to 1996. Ms. Zeiler holds a B.A. in Economics and English from Albion College.
Our executive officers are elected by the board of directors on an annual basis and serve until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Board Leadership Structure
Mr. Angle serves as our chief executive officer and chairman of the board. The board of directors believes that having our chief executive officer as chairman of the board facilitates the board of directors’ decision-making process because Mr. Angle has first-hand knowledge of our operations and the major opportunities and challenges facing us. This also enables Mr. Angle to act as the key link between the board of directors and other members of management. To assure effective independent oversight, our by-laws provide that the independent members of our board of directors will designate a lead independent director if the chairman of the board is not an independent director, as discussed further in “Executive Sessions of Independent Directors” below.
Independence of Members of the Board of Directors
The board of directors has determined that Dr. Kao, Mses. Ellinger,
Finney,Golz, Manolis and Stacy, and Messrs. Ali
Bell and Miller are independent within the meaning of
the director independence standards of Nasdaq and the SEC. Michael Bell, a current board member who is not standing for re-election at the annual meeting of stockholders, was also determined by our board of directors to be independent under the director independence standards of Nasdaq and the SEC. Furthermore, the board of directors has determined that each member of each of the committees of the board of directors is independent within the meaning of the director independence standards of Nasdaq and the SEC.
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors
Executive sessions of the independent directors are held during each regularly scheduled
in-person meeting of the board of directors. Executive sessions do not include any of our non-independent directors and are chaired by a lead independent director who is appointed annually by the board of directors from our independent directors. Mr. Ali currently serves as the lead independent director. In this role, Mr. Ali serves as chairperson of the independent director sessions. The independent directors of the board of directors met in executive session
six (6)four (4) times in
2020.2021.
Role of Lead Independent Director
The lead independent director works to ensure that “all voices are heard” within the boardroom, proactively spends considerable time with the chief executive officer and other executive officers, to understand the Company’s vision and strategy, and helps focus the board of directors on areas aligned with the Company’s vision and strategy. In addition to acting as the chairperson of the independent director sessions, the lead independent director also assists the board in assuring effective corporate governance. The lead independent director’s specific duties include:
| ● | Providing the chairman of the board with input as to preparation of agendas for meetings; |
| ● | Advising the chairman of the board as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from the Company’s management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties; |
| ● | Coordinating and developing the agenda for the executive sessions of the independent
directors; |
| ● | Acting as principal liaison between the independent directors and the chairman of the board on critical issues; |
| ● | Acting as a spokesperson for the independent directors able to talk with major investors and stockholders on topics of overall governance; |
•Providing the chairman of the board with input as to preparation of agendas for meetings;
•Advising the chairman of the board as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from the Company’s management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties;
•Coordinating and developing the agenda for the executive sessions of the independent directors;
•Acting as principal liaison between the independent directors and the chairman of the board on critical issues;
•Acting as a spokesperson for the independent directors able to talk with major investors and stockholders on topics of overall governance;
•Evaluating, along with the members of the compensation and talent committee, the chief executive officer’s performance and meeting with the chief executive officer to discuss such evaluation; and
•Acting as chairperson of the board in the absence of the chairman of the board or a vacancy in the position of chairman of the board.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement | ● | Evaluating, along with the members of the compensation and talent committee, the chief executive officer’s performance and meeting with the chief executive officer to discuss such evaluation; and |
| ● | Acting as chairperson of the board in the absence of the chairman of the board or a vacancy in the position of chairman of the board. |
The Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight
The board of directors oversees our risk management process. This oversight is primarily accomplished through the board of directors’ committees and management’s reporting processes, including receiving regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks. The audit committee focuses on risk related to accounting, internal controls, financial and tax reporting, privacy and cybersecurity. The audit committee also assesses economic and business risks and monitors compliance with ethical standards. The compensation and talent committee identifies and oversees risks associated with our executive compensation policies and practices, and the nominating and corporate governance committee identifies and oversees risks associated with director independence, related party transactions and the implementation of corporate governance policies.
Policies Governing Director Nominations
The nominating and corporate governance committee of the board of directors is responsible for reviewing with the board of directors from time to time the appropriate qualities, skills and characteristics desired of members of the board of directors in the context of the needs of the business and current make-up of the board of directors. This assessment includes consideration of the following minimum qualifications that the nominating and corporate governance committee believes must be met by all directors:
| ● | Nominees must have experience at a strategic or policy making level in a business, government, non-profit or academic organization of high standing; |
| ● | Nominees must be highly accomplished in their respective fields, with superior credentials and recognition; |
| ● | Nominees must be well regarded in the community and shall have a long-term reputation for the highest ethical and moral standards; |
| ● | Nominees must have sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of the Company, particularly in light of the number of boards on which the nominee may serve; |
| ● | Nominees must be free of conflicts of interest and potential conflicts of interest, in particular with relationships with other boards; and |
| ● | Nominees must, to the extent such nominee serves or has previously served on other boards, demonstrate a history of actively contributing at board meetings. |
•Nominees must have experience at a strategic or policy making level in a business, government, non-profit or academic organization of high standing;
•Nominees must be highly accomplished in their respective fields, with superior credentials and recognition;
•Nominees must be well regarded in the community and shall have a long-term reputation for the highest ethical and moral standards;
•Nominees must have sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of the Company, particularly in light of the number of boards on which the nominee may serve;
•Nominees must be free of conflicts of interest and potential conflicts of interest, in particular with relationships with other boards; and
•Nominees must, to the extent such nominee serves or has previously served on other boards, demonstrate a history of actively contributing at board meetings.
We do not have a formal board diversity policy. However, pursuant to the Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations, as part of its evaluation of potential director candidates and in addition to other standards the nominating and corporate governance committee may deem appropriate from time to time for the overall structure and composition of the board of directors, the nominating and corporate governance committee may consider whether each candidate, if elected, assists in achieving a mix of board members that represent a diversity of background and experience. Accordingly, the board of directors seeks members from diverse professional backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of relevant industry, geographical understanding and strategic experience
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
and expertise that, in concert, offer us and our stockholders a diverse set of opinions and insights in the areas most important to us and our corporate mission. In addition, nominees for director are selected to bring complementary, rather than overlapping, skill sets. All candidates for director nominee must have time available to devote to the activities of the board of directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee also considers the independence of candidates for director nominee, including the appearance of any conflict in serving as a director. Candidates for director nominee who do not meet all of these criteria may still be considered for nomination to the board of directors, if the nominating and corporate governance committee believes that the candidate will make an exceptional contribution to us and our stockholders.
Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees
The board of directors delegates the initial selection and nomination process to the nominating and corporate governance committee, with the expectation that other members of the board of directors, and of management, will be requested to take part in the process as appropriate.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
24
Generally, the nominating and corporate governance committee identifies candidates for director nominee in consultation with management, through the use of search firms or other advisors, through the recommendations submitted by stockholders or through such other methods as the nominating and corporate governance committee deems to be helpful to identify candidates.
The nominating and corporate governance committee has engaged Russell Reynolds, a third-party search firm, to assist in identifying potential candidates, for which the third-party search firm is paid a fee. Once candidates have been identified, the nominating and corporate governance committee confirms that the candidates meet all of the minimum qualifications for director nominees established by the nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee may gather information about the candidates through interviews, detailed questionnaires, comprehensive background checks or any other means that the nominating and corporate governance committee deems to be helpful in the evaluation process. The nominating and corporate governance committee then meets as a group to discuss and evaluate the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall composition and needs of the board of directors. Based on the results of the evaluation process, the nominating and corporate governance committee recommends candidates for the board of directors’ approval as director nominees for election to the board of directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee also recommends candidates to the board of directors for appointment to the committees of the board of directors. Once appropriate candidates have been identified, the entire board of directors votes on the candidates, as the selection of board nominees is a responsibility of the entire board of directors.
In August 2021, Russell Reynolds, a third-party search firm, was retained by the nominating and corporate governance committee to help identify future board candidates for the board of directors and subsequently identified Ms. Golz as a candidate.
Procedures for Recommendation of Director Nominees by Stockholders
The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider director nominee candidates who are recommended by our stockholders. Stockholders, in submitting recommendations to the nominating and corporate governance committee for director nominee candidates, shall follow the following procedures:
The nominating and corporate governance committee must receive any such recommendation for nomination not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the Proxy Statement delivered to stockholders in connection with the preceding year’s annual meeting.
All recommendations for nomination must be in writing and include the following:
| ● |
•Name and address of the stockholder making the recommendation; |
| ● | A representation that the stockholder is a record holder of the Company’s securities, or if the stockholder is not a record holder, evidence of ownership; |
Notice of Annual Meetingthe stockholder making the recommendation;
•A representation that the stockholder is a record holder of Stockholdersthe Company’s securities, or if the stockholder is not a record holder, evidence of ownership;
•Name, age, business and iRobot 2021residential address, educational background, current principal occupation or employment, and principal occupation or employment for the preceding five full fiscal years of the individual recommended for consideration as a director nominee;
•A description of the qualifications and background of the proposed director nominee which addresses the minimum qualifications, actual or potential conflicts of interest, and other criteria for board membership approved by the board of directors from time to time and set forth in the Company’s Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations;
•A description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and the proposed director nominee;
•The consent of the proposed director nominee (i) to be named in the Proxy Statement for the annual meeting and (ii) to serve as a director if elected at such annual meeting; and •Any other information regarding the proposed director nominee that is required to be included in the Proxy Statement. | ● | Name, age, business and residential address, educational background, current principal occupation or employment, and principal occupation or employment for the preceding five full fiscal years of the individual recommended for consideration as a director nominee; |
| ● | A description of the qualifications and background of the proposed director nominee which addresses the minimum qualifications, actual or potential conflicts of interest, and other criteria for board membership approved by the board of directors from time to time and set forth in the Company’s Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations; |
| ● | A description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and the proposed director nominee; |
| ● | The consent of the proposed director nominee (i) to be named in the Proxy Statement for the annual meeting and (ii) to serve as a director if elected at such annual meeting; and |
| ● | Any other information regarding the proposed director nominee that is required to be included in the Proxy Statement. |
Nominations must be sent to the attention of our
secretarySecretary by U.S. mail (including courier or expedited delivery service) to:
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
Attn: Secretary of iRobot Corporation
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
25
Our Secretary will promptly forward any such nominations to the nominating and corporate governance committee.
In addition, our by-laws permit eligible stockholders, or groups of stockholders, owning continuously for at least three years shares of the Company’s stock representing an aggregate of at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding shares, to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to two or 25%, whichever is greater, of the board of directors, provided that the stockholders and nominees satisfy the requirements in our by-laws. Written notice of stockholder nominees to the board of directors must be received not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the proceeding year’s annual meeting. For details on the Company’s proxy access procedures, please refer to our by-laws.
Policy Governing Security Holder Communications with the Board of Directors
The board of directors provides to every security holder the ability to communicate with the board of directors as a whole and with individual directors on the board of directors through an established process for security holder communications as follows:
For communications directed to the board of directors as a whole, security holders may send such communications to the attention of the chairman of the board of directors by U.S. mail (including courier or expedited delivery service) to:
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
Attn: Chairman of the Board, c/o Secretary
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
For security holder communications directed to an individual director in his or her capacity as a member of the board of directors, security holders may send such communications to the attention of the individual director by U.S. mail (including courier or expedited delivery service) to:
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
Attn: [Name of the director], c/o Secretary
We will forward any such security holder communication to the chairman of the board, as a representative of the board of directors, or to the director to whom the communication is addressed. We will forward such communications by certified U.S. mail to an address specified by each director and the chairman of the board for such purposes or by secure electronic transmission.
Policy Governing Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
Our policy is to schedule a regular meeting of the board of directors on the same date as as or immediately prior to, our annual meeting of stockholders and, accordingly, directors are encouraged to be present at our stockholder meetings. Our directors are expected to participate in the virtual annual meeting of stockholders, unless they have a conflict that cannot be resolved. Eight board members who were directors at the time of the annual meeting of stockholders held in 20202021 attended the meeting.
Board of Directors Evaluation Program
The board of directors performs annual self-evaluations of its composition and performance, including evaluations of its standing committees and individual evaluations for each director. In addition, each of the standing committees of the board of directors conducts its own self-evaluation, which is reported to the board of directors. The board of directors retains the authority to engage its own advisors and consultants.
For more corporate governance information, you are invited to access such information at https://investor.irobot.com/corporate-governance/highlights.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
26
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a “code of ethics,” as defined by regulations promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Exchange Act, that applies to all of our directors and employees worldwide, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions. A current copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available at https://investor.irobot.com/corporate-governance/highlights. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may also be obtained, free of charge, from us upon a request directed to: iRobot Corporation, 8 Crosby Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, Attention: Investor Relations. We intend to disclose any amendment to or waiver of a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website available at https://investor.irobot.com/corporate-governance/highlights and/or in our public filings with the SEC.Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Human Rights Policy
We have adopted a Human Rights Policy. Respect for human rights is an essential value for our Company and for the communities in which we operate. We are committed to ensuring that our employees and individuals in the communities affected by our activities are treated with dignity and respect. We believe that following these principles helps our employees and our business thrive as we develop new and exciting technologies for the smart home. For additional information about this policy, please visit our website at www.irobot.com.
iRobot’s Manufacturing Supply Chain Partners: Business Conduct, Environment, Labor Practices
Our primary contract manufacturers and most significant suppliers work under a master supply agreement that includes provisions for compliance with environmental regulations consistent with the iRobot General Environmental Regulatory Requirements, conflict minerals provisions within Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, anti-corruption laws and all applicable local government regulations regarding minimum wage, living conditions, overtime, working conditions, child labor laws and the applicable labor and environmental laws. For additional information about these practices, please visit the Corporate Social Responsibility section of our website at www.irobot.com/www.irobot.com/about-irobot/corporate-social-responsibility.
Compensation and Talent Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During
2020,2021, Mses. Finney and Stacy, and Mr. Bell and Dr. Kao served as members of the compensation and talent
committee. On November 17, 2021, Elisha Finney resigned from the board and the compensation committee. No member of the compensation and talent committee was an employee or former employee of us or any of our subsidiaries, or had any relationship with us requiring disclosure herein.
During the last year, no executive officer of the Company served as: (i) a member of the compensation and talent committee (or other committee of the board of directors performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our compensation and talent committee; (ii) a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our compensation and talent committee; or (iii) a member of the compensation and talent committee (or other committee of the board of directors performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of the Company.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
No portion of this audit committee report shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), through any general statement incorporating by reference in its entirety the Proxy Statement in which this report appears, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this report or a portion of it by reference. In addition, this report shall not be deemed filed under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
This report is submitted by the audit committee of the board of directors. The audit committee currently consists of Andrew Miller,
Elisha FinneyKaren Golz and Eva Manolis. None of the members of the audit committee is an officer or employee of the Company, and the board of directors has determined that each member of the audit committee meets the independence requirements promulgated by Nasdaq and the SEC, including Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act. Each of Mr. Miller and Ms.
FinneyGolz is an “audit committee financial expert” as is currently defined under SEC rules. The audit committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors.
The audit committee oversees the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes on behalf of the board of directors. The meetings of the audit committee are designed to facilitate and encourage communication among the audit committee, Company management, the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company’s internal audit function. The Company’s management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarters and full year ended January
2, 2021,1, 2022, including a discussion of, among other things, the quarterly and annual earnings press releases, the quality of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the Company’s financial statements.
The audit committee ensures that the Company establishes and appropriately resources a professional internal auditing function and that there are no unjustified restrictions or limitations imposed on that function. In addition to reviewing and approving the annual internal audit plan and overseeing other internal audit activities, the audit committee regularly reviews and discusses the results of internal audit reports.
The audit committee also reviewed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the results of their audit and discussed matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC. The audit committee has reviewed permitted services under rules of the SEC as currently in effect and discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP their independence from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has considered and discussed the compatibility of non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with that firm’s independence. For each engagement, Company management provided the audit committee with information about the services and fees, sufficiently detailed to allow the audit committee to make an informed judgment about the nature and scope of the services and the potential for the services to impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. After the end of each fiscal year, Company management provides the audit committee with a summary of actual fees incurred with the independent registered public accounting firm.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
The audit committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations; their evaluations of the Company’s internal control, including internal control over financial reporting; and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. Additionally, the audit committee meets in separate executive sessions with the Company’s chief financial officer and the head of internal audit.
In accordance with SEC rules and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP policies, lead and concurring audit partners are subject to rotation requirements that limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide services to our Company to a maximum of five years. The selection of the lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the candidate for the role and the chair of the audit committee, as well as with the full audit committee and members of management.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
28
The audit committee has also evaluated the performance of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, including, among other things, the length of time the firm has been engaged; its familiarity with our operations and businesses, accounting policies and practices, and our internal controls over financial reporting; and the appropriateness of fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for audit and non-audit services in 2020,2021, on an absolute basis and as compared with the scope of prior year audits. Information about PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s fees for 20202021 is discussed below in this Proxy Statement under “Proposal 2 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.” Based on its evaluation, the audit committee has retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 20212022 fiscal year.
Based on its review of the financial statements and the aforementioned discussions, the audit committee concluded that it would be reasonable to recommend, and on that basis, did recommend, to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January
2, 2021,1, 2022, which was filed with the SEC on February
16, 2021.15, 2022. | | |
| Respectfully submitted by the Audit Committee, |
| | |
| Andrew Miller (chairman)(chair) |
| Karen Golz |
Elisha Finney
Eva Manolis |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
No portion of this compensation and talent committee report shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), through any general statement incorporating by reference in its entirety the Proxy Statement in which this report appears, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this report or a portion of it by reference. In addition, this report shall not be deemed filed under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
The compensation and talent committee of the board of directors, which is comprised solely of independent directors within the meaning of applicable rules of Nasdaq, outside directors within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and non-employee directors within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, is responsible for developing executive compensation policies and advising the board of directors with respect to such policies and administering the Company’s cash incentive and equity incentive plans. The compensation and talent committee sets performance goals and objectives for the chief executive officer and the other executive officers, evaluates their performance with respect to those goals and sets their compensation based upon the evaluation of their performance. In evaluating executive officer pay, the compensation and talent committee retains the services of a compensation consultant and considers recommendations from the chief executive officer with respect to goals and compensation of the other executive officers. The compensation and talent committee assesses the information it receives in accordance with its business judgment. The compensation and talent committee also periodically reviews director compensation. All decisions with respect to executive and director compensation are approved by the compensation and talent committee. All decisions regarding chief executive officer and director compensation are reviewed and ratified by the full board. Mr. Bell, Dr. Kao and Mses. Finney andMs. Stacy are the current members of the compensation and talent committee. Mr. Bell will not be standing for re-election to the board of directors. Mr. Bell's term on the compensation and talent committee will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders.
The compensation and talent committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) for the year ended January
2, 20211, 2022 with management. In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the compensation and talent committee recommended to the board of directors, and the board of directors has approved, that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January
2, 2021,1, 2022, which was filed with the SEC on February
16, 2021.15, 2022.
| | |
| Respectfully submitted by the Compensation and Talent Committee, |
| |
| Michelle Stacy (chair) |
Michael Bell (chairman) |
| Elisha Finney |
| Ruey-Bin Kao Michelle Stacy
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
CONCERNING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Overview
The pandemic has impacted individuals and families in profound ways with the home becoming a primary hub for work, education, exercise, entertainment and more.
The fluid, often frenetic pace of day-to-day life continues to elevate our value proposition and product differentiation.
The growth runway for robotic floor care remains fundamentally healthy, and we remain well positioned to continue our global expansion as a category and technology leader. We continue to differentiate our floor care robots through superior software intelligence and have taken major steps forward to transform our go-to-market approach. As the benefits of robotic floor cleaning become more widely appreciated and the home remains a central hub for everyday life, we plan to continue capitalizing on the many opportunities arising from the continued growth of our marketplace. When combined with the accelerating pace of the adoption and use of robotics more broadly, the competition for executive talent in our industry continues to be significant. While we compete to attract and retain talent against other established technology companies, the skill sets, expertise and capabilities that we believe will help us further expand our business and drive value creation increasingly bring us into competition for talent against a wider range of technology companies, including those focused on disruptive and emerging technologies.
Our compensation philosophy is based on a desire to emphasize pay for performance through incentive compensation that is designed to closely link the realized compensation of our named executive officers to our financial and operating performance. We also believe that the compensation of our named executive officers should strongly align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders and focus executive behavior on the achievement of both near-term corporate targets as well as long-term business objectives and strategies.
2020
2021 Financial Performance Highlights
Our
2021 performance
as a Company in 2020 was exceptionally strong. Notwithstandingdiffered meaningfully between the
initial impactfirst and second halves of the
pandemic on our business and on our retail partners, we achieved outstanding financial results and continued to position the Company for future success through ongoing investments in product development and our direct-to-consumer (“DTC”) strategy. Resurgent demand combinedyear with outstanding
collaborationfirst-half revenue growth and
execution among our sales, marketing andprofitability followed by a second half that was shaped by ongoing supply chain
teams underpinned excellent performance over the balance of the year. More specifically: | ● | Revenue grew 18% to a record $1.43 billion. |
| ● | Full-year Operating Income was up 69% to $146.3 million, compared with $86.6 million in 2019. Non-GAAP Operating Income increased 19% to $149.7 million.
|
| ● | Our top-line expansion resulted in an Operating Profit Margin of 10% (GAAP and Non-GAAP). |
| ● | Net Income increased 72% to $147.1 million, from $85.3 million in 2019. Non-GAAP Net Income increased to $118.6 million, from $104.0 million in 2019.
|
| ● | Diluted Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) grew 73% to $5.14, from $2.97 in 2019. Diluted Non-GAAP EPS of $4.14 increased 14% from $3.62 in 2019. |
These metrics all surpassedchallenges and shipping delays that impacted our original targets for 2020. Our strong 2020 performance is particularly notable coming on the heels of 2019top and bottom lines. While our 2021 financial performance that fell below our target objectives.original expectations, we continued to expand our business with revenue growth of 9% to a record $1.565 billion. We also made considerable and important strategic progress during the year. We grew our connected customer base by 44%, advanced innovation with substantial enhancement to our Genius Home Intelligence platform and the introduction of two new Roomba robots, continued to implement a range of marketing systems and tools to support the growth of our direct-to-consumer sales channel, diversified our product portfolio with the acquisition of Aeris in November 2021, and increased our supply chain continuity, resiliency, and agility. We believe that our investments, progress and achievements have placed iRobot on a very exciting path to continue to drive substantial value creation for customers, employees and stockholders over the coming years. See pages 28 and 29 of our Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2021 for a reconciliation of all non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy StatementRevenue
$1.4B an increase of 18% from full-year 2019
| Operating Income
$146.3M compared with $86.6M from full-year 2019
| | Non-GAAP Revenue
$1.4B an increase of 18% from full-year 2019
| Non-GAAP Operating Income
$149.7M compared with $125.8M from full-year 2019 |
Diluted Earnings Per Share
$5.14 compared with $2.97 for full-year 2019 | Net Income
$147.1M compared with $85.3M from full-year 2019
| | Non-GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Share
$4.14 compared with $3.62 for full-year 2019 | Non-GAAP Net Income
$118.6M compared with $104.0M from full-year 2019 |
Historical Financial Performance
Our recent financial performance has been very strong.
While 20192021 was a challenging year given the more difficult than anticipated market conditionsin terms of our profitability and stock price performance, we continued to execute on and invest in our long-term strategy. During 2021, we made considerable and important strategic progress in the U.S., we deliveredfollowing areas:
| | | | | | | | |
| 2021 Strategic Accomplishments and Highlights: |
| Strategy Component | Achievements |
| Innovate | Completed multiple enhancements to the Genius Home Intelligence platform |
| Introduced two new Roomba robots, the j7 Series and the i1 Series |
| With Genius' highest value capabilities showcased in our mid-tier and premium floor care robots, sales of these robots grew 15% in 2021 |
| With Genius as a key differentiator, Roomba remained the category technology and share leader globally |
| GET | Expanded our base of connected customers who have opted into our digital communications by 44% to 14.0 million |
| Grew revenue from retailers and distributors by 8% |
| Expanded our pilots for new robot-as-a-service subscription services and ended 2021 with approximately 74,000 members globally |
| KEEP | Quarterly utilization, a metric that tracks the percentage of robots running missions from one quarter to the next quarter, remained strong throughout 2021 at over 90% |
| Maintained favorable Net Promoter and Customer Satisfaction scores during 2021 |
| GROW | Expanded revenue from connected customers by approximately 10% (representing 21% of our total revenue in 2021) |
| Increased direct-to-consumer (DTC) revenue by 24% in 2021 (representing 12% of our total revenue in 2021) |
| Implemented new marketing technology systems and tools |
| Increased accessory sales by 24% (representing approximately 4% of our total revenue in 2021) |
| Completed our strategic acquisition of Aeris, expanding our total addressable market and diversifying our product portfolio to include premium air purifiers |
Compensation Highlights:
Following our very strong results in 2020. Revenue in 2020 performance, where revenue grew 18% to $1.43 billion, with, and we achieved an operating margin of 10%, a non-GAAP net income per diluted shares of $4.14, we did not make significant changes to the design of our executive compensation program. The most notable adjustment we made was to increase the percentage of our CEO’s annual equity award granted in the form of PSUs from 50% to 60%. TheWhile the general design principles remained the same, our compensation decisions and incentive plan outcomes related to 2021 reflected both the challenges we faced during the year and our pay for performance below demonstratesphilosophy. Specifically:
•No salary increases. Our named executive officers received no salary increases for 2022 in light of our focus on growing2021 results.
•No annual bonus payouts. We fell short of the threshold performance levels for revenue and non-GAAP operating income under our 2021 bonus plan. Despite significant and sustained supply chain challenges and shipping delays that impacted our business, while continuingwe did not make any discretionary adjustments to deliver stockholder value.
our goals or plan design. As a result, no annual bonuses were paid under the annual bonus plan.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy StatementCOMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN*
Among iRobot Corporation,
•No PSU vesting. We also did not achieve the NASDAQ Composite Index, 2019 Peer Group and 2020 Peer Group
*$100 invested on 12/31/15 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.
**Performancethreshold performance levels for non-GAAP operating income for the 2019 PSUs that were eligible to vest based on performance through in 2021 and, 2020 Peer Groups are the same from 2016 to 2018 and have immaterial differences in 2019 and 2020. Please see the performance table below for the performanceaccordingly, none of each peer group.
| | | 12/15 | | 12/16 | | 12/17 | | 12/18 | | 12/19 | | 12/20 |
| iRobot Corporation | | 100.00 | | 165.11 | | 216.67 | | 236.55 | | 143.02 | | 226.81 |
| Nasdaq Composite | | 100.00 | | 108.87 | | 141.13 | | 137.12 | | 187.44 | | 271.64 |
| 2019 Peer Group | | 100.00 | | 136.04 | | 177.63 | | 163.16 | | 258.70 | | 414.62 |
| 2020 Peer Group | | 100.00 | | 136.04 | | 177.63 | | 163.16 | | 258.71 | | 414.10 |
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
The graph above compares the cumulative 5-Year total stockholder return provided on iRobot Corporation’s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the Nasdaq Composite index and two customized peer groups of sixteen companies and seventeen companies, respectively, with those individual companies listed in footnotes 1 and 2 below. There is an expanded discussion on our peer group in the section “Compensation Comparisons” on page 41. An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock, the index and in each of the peer groups on December 31, 2015 and its relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2020.
| (1) | There are sixteen companies included in the Company’s 2019 peer group which are: 3d Systems Corp, Brooks Automation Inc., Coherent Inc., Dolby Laboratories Inc., Faro Technologies Inc., Fitbit Inc., Garmin Ltd., Gopro Inc., Logitech International S.A., Netgear Inc., Novanta Inc., Plantronics Inc., TiVo Corporation, Trimble Inc., Ubiquiti Inc. and Universal Electronics Inc. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of StockholdersPSUs vested. and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
| (2) | The 2020 peer group remained largely the same, except for the removal of TiVo Corporation and the addition of Roku Inc., and Sonos Inc. |
Despite expected headwinds due to tariffs and a shift in our manufacturing strategy and the unanticipated challenges that arose directly and indirectly from the pandemic, we remained focused on the safety of our employees and customers and continued to execute on key elements of our strategy during 2020:
2020 Strategic Priorities and Outcomes:
|
Differentiate the Cleaning Experience | Introduced our state-of-the-art robot AI platform, iRobot Genius Home Intelligence, unlocking a range of new features and functionality, giving users greater control over where, when, and how our robots clean. |
Expanded our lineup of intelligent, self-emptying robot vacuum cleaners in September 2020 with launch of the Roomba i3 Series. |
Introduced the Roomba Combo, our first 2-in-1 floor cleaning robot that consolidates vacuuming and mopping functionality. |
Build Stronger, Enduring Relationships with Consumers Worldwide | Ended 2020 with nearly 10 million connected consumers who have opted-in to our digital communications, up more than 80% over 2019. |
Delivered great value to our customers through digital features within our Genius platform as evidenced by consistently high levels of utilization by our connected customers and robust engagement around new capabilities. |
Expanded engagement within our base of connected customers receiving in-app notifications and emails. This demonstrates their interest in better understanding how to maximize the cleaning capabilities of their robots and facilitates opportunities to help customers better maintain their robots, replace and upgrade their robots, add new robots and potentially purchase other new services and products from us that complement our current role in helping them keep homes clean. |
Nurture Lifetime Value of Customer Relationships | Accelerated investments to further enhance the buying experience, including upgrading our digital marketing capabilities and investing in making our website a desired destination for current and prospective customers. |
Conducted tests of new services that span extended warranties, a robot-as-a-service membership program, and a premium care and maintenance offering, with plan to commercialize these services over the course of 2021. |
Significantly expanded our DTC sales. DTC sales represented more than 11% of total Revenue in 2020, up from 6% in 2019. We view our DTC channel as a powerful complement to our strong retail partnerships. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Compensation Highlights:
We proactively modified certain aspects of our compensation plan designs in 2020 to better reflect increased uncertainty and our expected business conditions in 2020. These adjustments primarily reflected ongoing and anticipated challenges related to our supply chain, including geographically diversifying our manufacturing activities associated with expanding production in Malaysia and managing through significant uncertainty related to the U.S. tariffs and trade negotiations between the U.S. and China. In addition, we transitioned to a new profitability metric that better aligned with recent changes in our financial reporting. Highlights of our proactive incentive plan design changes are outlined below:
2020 Annual Bonus Plan Changes:
| ● | For our profitability metric, in response to the target being set lower than the prior year’s performance, we instituted a requirement to achieve 110% of the internally set target to earn a target payout. |
| ● | In 2020 we changed the profitability metric to Non-GAAP Operating Income, from Adjusted EBITDA to better align with our public disclosures while still ensuring that profitability remains a key element of our short-term incentive plan. |
| ● | We increased the threshold performance requirement on our Revenue metric, making it more challenging to achieve a payout. Specifically, for fiscal 2020, the threshold was 95% of target, whereas in the prior year plan, the threshold performance requirement was 90% of target. |
2020 Performance Based Equity Award Changes:
| ● | We changed the financial metric from GAAP Operating Income to Non-GAAP Operating Income, which better aligns with our public disclosures and is consistent with our belief that this metric provides not only a good short-term view into our underlying performance but a good long-term view on the health of our business. |
| ● | We modified the “target performance range” to 100% to 110%, where attainment in the target performance range earns a payout of 100% of target. In the prior year plan, the “target performance range” was 90% to 110%. This change provides for a lower payout opportunity at the same attainment levels as the prior year plan. |
| ● | We increased the level of outperformance required for payments above target relative to historical plans. For example, achieving a maximum payout requires 130% of target performance achievement versus 120% performance historically. |
CEO Compensation Changes:
Reduced the CEO’s 2020 equity grant value by over 30% from prior year to acknowledge 2019 performance and the outlook for 2020.
Named Executive
Officer | | Total Grant Date
Fair Value 2019 | | Total Grant Date
Fair Value 2020 | | Difference |
| Colin M. Angle | | $5,552,768 | | $3,851,978 | | ($1,700,790) (30.6%) |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
iRobot’s compensation programs are designed to align pay with Company performance and while our 2019 financial results fell short of targets, our 2020 financial performance was very strong. The compensation and talent committee’s executive pay decisions and our pay outcomes reflect this trajectory and alignment:
| | Outcomes Related to 2019
Performance | | Outcomes Related to 2020
Performance |
| | | | |
Base Salary | | No base salary increases in 2020 other than for one NEO | | Base salary increases were provided to each NEO in recognition of the strong performance |
| | | | |
Annual Incentive Bonus | | Bonus payout of 39% of target, which reflected falling short of target on Revenue & falling short of threshold performance on Adjusted EBITDA | | Bonus payout of 166% of target, which reflected achievement above target on both Revenue & Non-GAAP Operating Income |
| | | | |
Performance Based Equity
Awards | | Payout for 2017 Plan (performance period ending December 28, 2019): 77% of target | | Payout for 2018 Plan (performance period ending January 2, 2021): 100% of target |
Our compensation plans are highly sensitive to Company performance and emphasize pay that is variable and/or “performance-based” and/or “at risk.” AsIn 2021, performance fell below our expectations, and as of December 31, 2021, our CEO’s 2021 realizable pay was only 53% of his targeted total compensation, as shown below. At the end of 2020, as a result of our very strong performance, during 2020, our CEO’s 2020 realizable pay was 160% of his targeted total compensation, as shown below. In 2019, when performance fell below our expectations, our CEO’s realizable pay was only 49% of his targeted total compensation, also shown below.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Objectives of Our Compensation Program
We believe our compensation philosophies and objectives, as further described below, have aligned executive compensation with Company performance. Our compensation programs for our executive officers are designed to achieve the following objectives:
| ● | Provide competitive compensation that attracts, motivates and retains the best talent and the highest caliber executives in order to help us to achieve our strategic objectives; |
| ● |
•Provide competitive compensation that attracts, motivates and retains the best talent and the highest caliber executives in order to help us to achieve our strategic objectives; •Connect a significant portion of the total potential compensation paid to executives to our annual financial performance; |
| ● | Directly a significant portion of the total potential compensation paid to executives to our annual financial performance;•Directly align management’s interest with the interests of stockholders through long-term equity incentives; and •Provide management with performance goals that are directly linked to our longer-term plans for growth and profit. lign management’s interest with the interests of stockholders through long-term equity incentives; and
|
| ● | Provide management with performance goals that are directly linked to our longer-term plans for growth and profit. |
We believe the compensation of our named executive officers should reflect their success as a management team, rather than as individuals, in attaining key operating objectives, such as Non-GAAP Operating Incomenon-GAAP operating income and Revenue.revenue. We define Non-GAAP Operating Incomenon-GAAP operating income as Operating Incomeoperating income before amortization of acquired intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense, tariff refunds, net merger, acquisition and divestiture (expense) income, net intellectual property litigation expense, and restructuring and other expense. See pages 2831 and 29 32 of our Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 20211, 2022, for a reconciliation of Non-GAAP Operating Incomenon-GAAP operating income to GAAP Operating Income.
operating income.
We also believe that the compensationhaving a significant portion of our named executive officers should not beofficers' compensation based on the short-term performance of our stock, whether favorable or unfavorable, but rather that the price of our stock will, over the long-term, reflectrevenue and non-GAAP operating income drives our operating performance, and ultimately,in combination with the refinement and execution of our strategy by the Company’s management and employees.strate
gy, will drive long-term performance of our stock. Methodologies for Establishing Executive Compensation
The compensation and talent committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, reviews the compensation packages for our named executive officers, including an analysis of all elements of compensation separately and in the aggregate. In determining the appropriate compensation levels for our chief executive officer, the
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
33
compensation and talent committee meets with the executive vice president, human resources and corporate communications, along with the independent compensation consultant engaged by the compensation and talent committee. With respect to the compensation levels of all other named executive officers, the compensation and talent committee meets with our chief executive officer and, as needed, our executive vice president, human resources and corporate communications, as well as with the independent compensation consultant engaged by the compensation and talent committee. Our chief executive officer annually reviews the performance of each of the other named executive officers with the compensation and talent committee.
The compensation and talent committee has engaged Pay Governance as its independent executive compensation consultant. The consultant works with the compensation and talent committee in addition to our human resources department and the chief executive officer to assist them with a range of items including establishing an appropriate peer group, developing the structure of the executive compensation program and in formulating recommendations regarding base salary levels, target incentive awards, performance goals for incentive compensation and equity awards for named executive officers. In conjunction with the annual performance review of each named executive officer, the compensation and talent committee carefully considers the recommendations of the chief executive officer with respect to the other executive officers when setting base salary, bonus payments under the prior year’s incentive compensation plan, and target amounts and performance goals for the current year’s incentive compensation plan. In addition, the compensation and talent committee similarly determines the size and structure of equity incentive awards, if any, for each named executive officer.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Moreover, the compensation and talent committee considers the results of the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation, or the “say on pay” vote, that is currently held each year at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders.
At the May 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders, the Company held its annual say on pay vote. The results of the say on pay vote held in May 20202021 were as follows (as a percentage of the votes cast):| For | | 12,861,084 | | 96.0% |
| Against | | 344,716 | | 2.6% |
| Abstain | | 194,820 | | 1.5% |
| | | | | | | | |
| For | 18,854,454 | 93.9% |
| Against | 1,141,246 | 5.7% |
| Abstain | 93,491 | 0.5% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| * | Total may not equal 100% due to rounding | |
The results of the say on pay vote are advisory and not binding on the Company, the board of directors or the compensation and talent committee. The board of directors and the compensation and talent committee, however, value the opinions of our stockholders and take the results of the say on pay vote into account when making decisions regarding the compensation of our named executive officers. Additionally, a valuable aspect of our investor relations activities involves interacting with our current and prospective stockholders to discuss our executive compensation programs, answer timely and important questions about our compensation philosophies and practices, and gain direct feedback in the process.
The compensation and talent committee will, in consultation with Pay Governance and as appropriate, continue to consider changes to our compensation programs intended to further align the pay of our senior executives with our performance while taking into account
our business strategy, input from stockholders and evolving factors such as the business environment, the competitive market for talent and other emerging trends. Additionally, the compensation and talent committee will continue to consider the outcome of our say on pay votes, regulatory changes and emerging best practices when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.
Our compensation plans are developed, in part, by utilizing publicly available compensation data and subscriptionsubscription- compensation survey data for global national and regional companies in the technology and consumer technology industries, including those that focus on smart-tech and high-tech products. When determining the range of competitive practice for executive compensation, we review compensation data for companies with revenues, market capitalization, headcount and levels of ongoing research and development investment similar to our profile. There is an expanded discussion on our peer group in the section “Compensation Comparisons” on page 41. 35. While there are no perfect benchmarks for our Company, we believe that this approach provides us with valuable insights as to the competitive range of pay levels and practices of companies similar to ours.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
34
As the independent compensation consultant, Pay Governance provides the compensation and talent committee with advice on a broad range of executive compensation matters. In fiscal
2020,2021, the scope of Pay Governance’s services included the following:
| ● | •Apprising the compensation and talent committee of compensation-related and regulatory trends and developments in th25pte marketplace; |
| ● | Assessing the composition of the peer companies used for comparative purposes; |
Notice of Annual Meetingcompensation-related and regulatory trends and developments in the marketplace;
•Assessing the composition of Stockholdersthe peer companies used for comparative purposes;
•Performing a competitive assessment of our non-employee director and iRobot 2021executive compensation programs;
•Identifying potential changes to the executive compensation program to maintain competitiveness and ensure consistency with business strategies, good governance practices and alignment with stockholder interests; and
•Reviewing the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section of the Company’s Proxy Statement | ● | Performing a competitive assessment of our non-employee director and executive compensation programs; |
| ● | Identifying potential changes to the executive compensation program to maintain competitiveness and ensure consistency with business strategies, good governance practices and alignment with stockholder interests; and |
| ● | Reviewing the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section of the Company’s Proxy Statement. |
As more fully described on page 53,44, the compensation and talent committee reviewed its relationship with Pay Governance pursuant to SEC rules and determined Pay Governance’s work for the compensation and talent committee did not raise any conflicts of interest. The Company did not engage Pay Governance for any other consulting work in fiscal 2020.
2021.
Compensation Comparisons
Developing
Developing a compensation peer group for compensation comparison purposes is not an easy task for our Company. We do not have any “true” consumer robotic peer companies that are publicly-traded, stand-alone, U.S.-based and size-appropriate. We believe the mix of technology, smart technology/connected devices, and technology/consumer products entities that comprise our current compensation peer group provides appropriate reference points for compensation and performance comparisons.
The following selection criteria, developed in conjunction with the compensation and talent committee, which are carefully reviewed annually and adjusted as needed, were used to develop the comparative compensation peer group used in assessing the competitiveness of our executive compensation program and in helping develop fiscal year
20202021 compensation actions:
| ● | Companies with revenues within a similar range and generally similar market capitalization; |
| ● | Companies within comparable industries that focus on smart-tech and high-tech products (e.g., consumer durables, consumer services, aerospace, capital goods, electronics equipment, information technology, instruments and components, computers and peripherals, networking equipment and computer hardware); |
| ● | Companies with highly-engineered products and complex networked technologies with multiple industry applications; |
| ● | Technology companies whose products contain both hardware and software components, in particular cloud-connected devices, smart monitors, networked devices and consumer wearables; and |
| ● | Companies with moderate to high sales growth and opportunity. |
| ● | Other secondary criteria also considered include: |
| ● | Companies considered to be engaging in “disruptive innovation;” |
| ● | Companies producing high-technology products with brand recognition and/or that focus on disposable income “luxury” goods; and |
| ● | Companies with comparable levels of ongoing investment in research and development that indicate similar business models and financial strategy. |
•Companies with revenues within a similar range and generally similar market capitalization;
•Companies within comparable industries that focus on smart-tech and high-tech products (e.g., consumer durables, consumer services, aerospace, capital goods, electronics equipment, information technology, instruments and components, computers and peripherals, networking equipment and computer hardware);
•Companies with highly-engineered products and complex networked technologies with multiple industry applications;
•Technology companies whose products contain both hardware and software components, in particular cloud-connected devices, smart monitors, networked devices and consumer wearables; and
•Companies with moderate to high sales growth and opportunity.
•Other secondary criteria also considered include:
◦Companies considered to be engaging in “disruptive innovation;”
◦Companies producing high-technology products with brand recognition and/or that focus on disposable income “luxury” goods; and
◦Companies with comparable levels of ongoing investment in research and development that indicate similar business models and financial strategy.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
35
Our compensation peer group for
20202021 consisted of the following seventeen companies which we show in two different technology segments. Technology companies that focus on high tech products for consumers, and broader companies that have a technology focus and meet some or all of the criteria mentioned above.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
| Consumer Technology Companies | | Broader Technology Companies |
Fitbit,Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. | | 3D Systems Corporation |
| Fitbit, Inc. | Azenta Inc. (formerly Brooks Automation, Inc.) |
| Garmin Ltd. | | Brooks Automation,Coherent, Inc. |
| GoPro, Inc. | | Coherent,Dolby Laboratories, Inc. |
| Logitech International S.A. | | Dolby Laboratories,Faro Technologies, Inc. |
| NETGEAR, Inc. | | Faro Technologies,Novanta Inc. |
| Poly (Plantronics, Inc.) | | NovantaTrimble Inc. |
| Roku, Inc. | | Trimble Inc. |
| Sonos, Inc. | | Ubiquiti, Inc. |
| Universal Electronics Inc. | | |
This
20202021 compensation peer group differs slightly from the
20192020 compensation peer group due to the removal of
TiVo CorporationUbiquiti, Inc. and the addition of
Roku,Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
and Sonos, Inc. to our compensation peer group. The compensation and talent committee believes that the changes to the compensation peer group create better alignment with respect to key financial criteria and companies in comparable industries.
In addition, Fitbit, Inc. was removed from our compensation peer group after it was acquired by Google on January 14, 2021.
These companies, at the time of the analysis on June 30,
2019,2020, had a trailing 12-month median
Revenuerevenue of approximately
$1.1$1.2 billion and a median market capitalization of approximately
$2.7$3.1 billion. iRobot at this same time had trailing 12-month
Revenuerevenue of approximately $1.1 billion and a market capitalization of approximately
$2.5$2.3 billion.
The compensation and talent committee reviews all components of compensation for named executive officers. In accordance with its charter, the compensation and talent committee also, among other responsibilities, administers our incentive compensation plan, and reviews management’s recommendations on Company-wide compensation programs and practices. In setting compensation levels for our executive officers in fiscal
2020,2021, the compensation and talent committee considered many factors in addition to the competitive market analysis described above, including, but not limited to:
| ● | The scope and strategic impact of the executive officer’s responsibilities; |
| ● | Our past business performance, and future expectations; |
| ● | Our long-term goals and strategies; |
| ● | The performance and experience of each individual; |
| ● | Retention considerations; |
| ● | Unvested equity holdings; |
| ● | Past compensation levels of each individual and of the named executive officers as a group; |
| ● | Relative levels of pay among the executive officers; |
| ● | The amount of each component of compensation in the context of the executive officer’s total compensation and other benefits; |
| ● | Input from the board with respect to its evaluation of and recommendations for the chief executive officer; and |
| ● | Input from the chief executive officer with respect to the evaluation of and recommendations for the other named executive officers. |
•The scope and strategic impact of the executive officer’s responsibilities;
•Our past business performance, and future expectations;
•Our long-term goals and strategies;
•The performance and experience of each individual;
•Retention considerations;
•Unvested equity holdings;
•Past compensation levels of each individual and of the named executive officers as a group;
•Relative levels of pay among the executive officers;
•The amount of each component of compensation in the context of the executive officer’s total compensation and other benefits;
•Input from the board with respect to its evaluation of and recommendations for the chief executive officer; and
•Input from the chief executive officer with respect to the evaluation of and recommendations for the other named executive officers.
The compensation and talent committee recommends to the full board compensation for our chief executive officer using the same factors it considers for other executive officers, while placing greater emphasis on performance-based opportunities through long-term equity and short-term cash
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
incentive compensation, which we believe strongly aligns our chief executive officer’s interests and the interests of our stockholders. In assessing the compensation paid to our chief executive officer, the compensation and talent committee relies on input from the board of directors on performance, and information from our selected peer group benchmarks and its judgment with respect to the factors described above.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
36
Elements of Compensation and 20202021 Annual Target Compensation
Our executive compensation program in
20202021 consisted of three primary elements: base salary, annual cash incentives, and long-term equity awards, in the form of time-based RSUs and PSUs. All of our executive officers also are eligible for certain benefits offered to employees generally, including life, health, disability and dental insurance, as well as participation in our 401(k) plan and employee stock purchase plan. We have also entered into executive agreements with our executive officers that provide for certain severance benefits upon termination of employment, including a termination in connection with a change in control of the Company. The target compensation mix for each of our named executive officers was determined at the beginning of
20202021 and is summarized in the charts below.
The compensation mix shown above is based on the target amount for each of the elements and does not contemplate the upside and downside opportunity included in our variable incentive plans.
Base Salary
Salaries are reviewed on an annual basis and are structured to be within the market competitive range of salaries paid by the peer companies reviewed by the compensation and talent committee described above. While we generally aim to set base salaries for each of our executives to market competitive levels, the compensation and talent committee also takes into consideration many additional factors (described below) that we believe are important and have enabled us to attract, motivate and retain a high performing leadership team in an extremely competitive environment.
In
2020,2021, the compensation and talent committee reviewed the base salaries for each of our executive officers, taking into account an assessment of the individual’s responsibilities, experience, performance and contribution to the
Company’sCompany's performance, and also generally taking into account the competitive environment for attracting and retaining executives consistent with our business needs, along with those factors previously described. With respect to each of our other named executive officers, our chief executive officer provided a detailed evaluation and recommendation related to base salary adjustments, if
any (excluding for himself).any. The compensation levels for our executive officers in fiscal
20202021 were determined in February
20202021 following our
2019strong performance
in 2020 in which we delivered
11% Revenue18% revenue growth, an
Operating Marginoperating margin of
nearly 7%10%, and
Diluteddiluted EPS of
$2.97.$5.14. Additionally, our stock was trading close to a 52-week
low.Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
In connection with our annual review process in February 20202021 and taking into account the considerations discussed above as well as our 20192020 performance, the compensation and talent committee only made oneadjustments to the base salaries of Mr. Angle, Ms. Zeiler, Mr. Weinstein, and Mr. Blanc. The salary adjustment for Mr. Campanello as noted in the table below. This adjustment to Mr. Campanello wasincreases were made both in recognition of his exceptional performance. Ms. Zeiler receivedstrong performance in 2020 and to ensure we are maintaining a base salary adjustment on May 4, 2020 as partcompetitive positioning with our peer group and the market.
Notice of her promotion to EVP, Chief Financial Officer.Annual Meeting of Stockholders
and iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement 37
For
2021,2022, base salaries of our named executives were reviewed by the compensation and talent committee and
no adjustments were
made to the base salaries of certain of our named executive officers. These adjustments to salaries were in recognition of exceptional performance and to ensure we are maintaining a competitive position with our peer group and the market.| | | 2019 Base Salary | | % Increase | | 2020 Base Salary | | % Increase | | 2021 Base Salary |
| Colin M. Angle | | $825,000 | | 0.0% | | $825,000 | | 3.0% | | $850,000 |
| Julie Zeiler(1) | | $307,654 | | 38.0% | | $425,000 | | 17.6% | | $500,000 |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | $410,000 | | 0.0% | | $410,000 | | 4.9% | | $430,000 |
| Tim Saeger(2) | | $400,000 | | 0.0% | | $400,000 | | 0% | | $400,000 |
| Keith Hartsfield | | $400,000 | | 0.0% | | $400,000 | | 2.5% | | $410,000 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | $350,000 | | 14.2% | | $400,000 | | 2.5% | | $410,000 |
| Alison Dean(3) | | $500,000 | | 0.0% | | $500,000 | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 Base Salary | % Increase | 2021 Base Salary | % Increase | 2022 Base Salary |
| Colin Angle | $825,000 | 3.0% | $850,000 | 0.0% | $850,000 |
| Julie Zeiler | $425,000 | 17.6% | $500,000 | 0.0% | $500,000 |
| Glen Weinstein | $410,000 | 4.9% | $430,000 | 0.0% | $430,000 |
Jean Jacques Blanc(1) | $361,548 | 14.6% | $414,296 | 0.0% | $414,296 |
| Faris Habbaba(2) | N/A | N/A | $415,000 | 0.0% | $415,000 |
| | | | | |
| |
| (1) | Ms. ZeilerMr. Blanc’s base salary is denominated and paid in British pounds and the amount set forth above for 2020 was promotedconverted to EVP, Chief Financial Officer on May 4,U.S. dollars, using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.2829, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal year 2020. HerSimilarly, Mr. Blanc’s 2021 base salary was increased from $307,654converted to $425,000 in connection with her promotion.U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.3764, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal year 2021 and was also used for the 2022 base salary conversion. |
| (2) | Mr. Saeger resigned as an officer of the Company effective September 14, 2020, and his last day of employment with usHabbaba, was March 26,hired in June 2021. |
(3) | Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020 and her employment with the Company terminated on August 28, 2020. |
We believe that the base salaries of our named executive officers, which range from
13%12% to
24%21% as a percentage of total target compensation, are set at an appropriate level to align our compensation mix with our compensation philosophy.
Cash Incentive Compensation
The compensation and talent committee believes that short-term cash incentive compensation for our executive officers should be contingent upon successful achievement of significant financial and business objectives and implementation of our business strategy. For our named executive officers, including our chief executive officer, the payment of cash incentive awards is based on an evaluation of achievement against predetermined Company financial and operational metrics in accordance with our Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (“SEICP”) adopted by the compensation and talent committee. For each named executive officer, 100% of his or her target cash incentive compensation in
20202021 was tied to key Company financial and operating performance measures. We aim to set our cash incentive opportunities for named executive officers to be market competitive for performance at target with actual amounts earned adjusted up or down based on performance achievement, as described below.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
For fiscal
2020,2021, the threshold, target and maximum bonus award opportunities under our SEICP for each of our named executive officers, as a percentage of base salary are set forth in the table below. These target bonus amounts were set at levels the compensation and talent committee determined were appropriate to support our business plan, which involved growing the Company in a profitable, cost-effective way.
| | | Incentive Bonus Award Opportunity Payout Scale (% of base salary) |
| | | Threshold (12.5% of target opportunity) (1) | | Target (100%) | | Maximum (200% of target opportunity)
(2) |
| Colin M. Angle | | 13.75% | | 110.00% | | 220.00% |
| Julie Zeiler(3) | | 13.61% | | 64.18% | | 128.35% |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | 9.38% | | 75.00% | | 150.00% |
| Tim Saeger(4) | | 8.13% | | 65.00% | | 130.00% |
| Keith Hartsfield | | 7.50% | | 60.00% | | 120.00% |
| Russell J. Campanello | | 8.13% | | 65.00% | | 130.00% |
| Alison Dean(5) | | 10.00% | | 80.00% | | 160.00% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Incentive Bonus Award Opportunity Payout Scale (% of base salary) |
| | Threshold (12.5% of target opportunity) (1) | Target (100%) | Maximum (200% of target opportunity) (2) |
| Colin Angle | 14.38% | 115.00% | 230.00% |
| Julie Zeiler | 9.38% | 75.00% | 150.00% |
| Glen Weinstein | 9.38% | 75.00% | 150.00% |
| Jean Jacques Blanc | 9.38% | 75.00% | 150.00% |
Faris Habbaba(3) | — | 34.19% | 68.38% |
| | | | | |
| |
| (1) | Cash incentive payments are made only if the Company has achieved a specified Non-GAAP Operating Incomenon-GAAP operating income hurdle, excluding cash incentive compensation expense. |
| (2) | This reflects the maximum incentive cash payout levels established under our SEICP for 20202021 based on the specific goals established for fiscal 2020.2021. |
| (3) | Ms. Zeiler joinedPursuant to the SEICP on May 4, 2020, therefore the award opportunity payout scale above reflects a pro-rated portion from SEICP and a pro-rated portion from another incentive plan she was a participant in prior to her promotion. For the 2020 calendar year, Ms. Zeiler’s target bonus opportunity prior to her promotion was $107,679 (35%terms of her base salary). In connection with her promotion, Ms. Zeiler’s target bonus opportunity was increased to $318,750 (75% of her base salary). Her threshold bonus prior to her moving onto SEICP was equal to 20% of target and her threshold bonus following her promotion was 12.5% of target. |
(4) | Mr. Saeger resigned as an officer of the Company effective September 14, 2020, and his last day ofHabbaba’s employment with us was March 26, 2021. |
(5) | Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020 and her employmentagreement with the Company, terminated in August 2020 and, accordingly, she received nohe was eligible to earn a bonus awardof up to 200% of his pro-rated target incentive bonus opportunity for 2020.2021 but was guaranteed a minimum bonus for 2021 equal to at least 100% of his 2021 pro-rated target incentive opportunity. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
38
The following tables summarize the 20202021 performance measures, associated weightings and goals for each of the named executive officers under the SEICP, including actual performance achievement. When establishing our 2020 SEICP targets, to earn 100% payout for the Non-GAAP Operating Income metric, attainment had to be 110% of our annual operating plan (AOP) target of $90.6 million. To earn the threshold payout for the Revenue metric, 95% achievement of the Revenue target must be achieved. In prior years, 90% achievement of the Revenue target resulted in threshold payout. As discussed previously, theThe payout opportunity ranges from 12.5% of the target incentive opportunity for achieving threshold performance for one metric to 200% of the target incentive opportunity for achieving maximum level of performance for both metrics. For example,
As shown in the
eventtable below, our results were below threshold for both performance metrics. As a result and consistent with our pay for performance culture, the
Non-GAAP Operating Income is achieved at threshold andnamed executive officers did not receive any payouts under the
RevenueSEICP for 2021 performance, but Mr. Habbaba received a bonus equal to 100% of his pro-rated target
is not achieved, a 12.5% overall payout threshold would be achieved.Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
| | | | | Performance Goal |
| Metric | | Weightings | | Threshold | | Target* | | Maximum | | 2020 Actual
Performance | | Actual
Percentage
Earned (as %
of target) |
| | | | | $ in millions |
| Non-GAAP Operating Income, excluding cash incentive compensation expense | | 50% | | $81.5 | | $99.6 | | $120.5 | | $216.4 | | 100% |
| Company Revenue | | 50% | | $1,278.9 | | $1,346.2 | | $1,615.4 | | $1,430.4 | | 66% |
| Total Payout (as a % of Target) | | | | | | | | | | | | 166% |
* | Please note our internal goal for Non-GAAP Operating Income was $90.6 million, and achievement at this level would have provided less than a target payout. The plan needed to achieve 110% of the internal target, or $99.6 million to earn a target payout. |
Actual percentage earned (as % of target) is relativebonus opportunity pursuant to the weightingsterms of both metrics, which are 50% respectively.
Non-GAAP Operating Income (excluding cash incentive compensation expense) was achieved at 217% of target, which allowed for a maximum payout of 200% for this metric. This performance includes a $36.5 million Section 301 tariff refund, related to tariff payments made in 2018 and 2019, whichhis employment agreement with the Company worked diligently to obtain through petitioning officials at the White House, United States Trade Representative, and the Commerce Department. Non-GAAP Operating Income would have achieved a maximum payout even without the tariff refund. No adjustments were made due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Revenue achieved 106.3% of target, which resulted in a 131% payout for this metric.
Overall payout as a result of the overachievement performance of both metrics is 166%.
Company.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Performance Goal | |
| Metric | Weightings | Threshold | Target* | Maximum | 2021 Actual Performance | Actual Percentage Earned (as % of target) |
| | | $ in millions |
| Non-GAAP Operating Income, excluding cash incentive compensation expense | 50% | $139.6 | $155.1 | $206.3 | $48.7 | 0% |
| Company Revenue | 50% | $1,616.7 | $1,701.8 | $2,042.1 | $1,565.0 | 0% |
| Total Payout (as a % of Target) | | | | | | 0% |
The compensation and talent committee chose this mix of financial targets for cash incentive compensation because it believes it creates a balanced focus on growth and profitability, and it believes that executive officers should be focused on a small set of critical, team-based financial and operating metrics that reinforce the executive’s role and impact the Company’s business strategy.
Also, the compensation and talent committee established a minimum level of profitability whereby the available total incentive compensation payout for the entire employee base — including the named executive officers — would be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis if Non-GAAP Operating Income, including cash incentive compensation expense, fell below $58.3 million for the fiscal year.
We had a very strong 2020 with Revenue, Non-GAAP Operating Income and EPS surpassing the plans that we outlined at the beginning of the year. Solid demand combined with excellent collaboration and execution among our sales, marketing and operations teams and our broader supply chain enabled us to grow our top line performance. The strong Revenue performance, when combined with gaining a tariff exclusion and our diligence in managing our costs, resulted in an increased Non-GAAP Operating Income and EPS performance. Maintaining a clean home has taken on increasing importance with the pandemic forcing people to stay at home. Differentiating our floor cleaning robots with innovative features and functionality that support the fluid lifestyles of their owners is resonating in the marketplace. We were able to generate significant growth with our premium floor cleaning robots throughout the year. We also had a substantial expansion of our connected customer base, which grew over 80% in 2020.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy StatementWe are very proud
Table of our accomplishments in 2020, and the strong Revenue and Non-GAAP Operating Income performance notably exceeded each respective target. The below table outlines the cash awards to the named executive officers for performance in fiscal 2020 pursuant to our SEICP:| | | Incentive Bonus Award |
| | | Original Target Incentive
Opportunity | | Achievement | | SEICP Earned &
Paid |
| Colin M. Angle | | $907,500 | | 166% | | $1,506,450 |
| Julie Zeiler(1) | | $247,240 | | 166% | | $410,418 |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | $307,500 | | 166% | | $510,450 |
| Tim Saeger(2) | | $260,000 | | 166% | | $431,600 |
| Keith Hartsfield | | $240,000 | | 166% | | $398,400 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | $260,000 | | 166% | | $431,600 |
| Alison Dean(3) | | $400,000 | | — | | — |
(1) | Ms. Zeiler was promoted to EVP, Chief Financial Officer on May 4, 2020 therefore her target incentive opportunity is a combination of being eligible to participate in the SEICP and another incentive plan prior to her promotion. |
(2) | Mr. Saeger resigned as an officer of the Company effective September 14, 2020, and his last day of employment with us was March 26, 2021. |
(3) | Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020 and her employment with the Company terminated on August 28, 2020 and, accordingly, she received no bonus award for 2020. |
Contents
Long-Term Incentives
In
2020,2021, our named executive officers were eligible to receive a mix of time-based RSUs and PSUs that are intended to promote success by aligning employee financial interests with long-term stockholder value. Long-term incentives are awarded based on various factors primarily relating to the responsibilities of the individual officer or employee, his or her past performance, anticipated future contributions, prior grants, and competitive market and retention considerations as well as the pool of shares available for grant and Company performance. In general, our compensation and talent committee bases its decisions to grant long-term incentives on recommendations of our chief executive officer (for employees other than himself) and the compensation and talent committee’s analysis of peer group and industry compensation information, with the intention of keeping the executives’ overall target compensation levels competitive with our peers.
In 2020, we shifted the payout metric of the PSUs from GAAP Operating Income to Non-GAAP Operating Income. We also adjusted the 2020 PSU “target range” to 100% to 110%, where performance in the target range earns 100% payout. The 2019 PSUs had a “target range” of 90% to 110%, where performance in the target range earned 100% payout. To earn maximum payout of 200%, the Company’s performance must be at or above 130% of target, whereas for the 2019 PSUs, a performance of 120% of target earned a maximum payout of 200%.
The compensation and talent committee believes that our mix of long-term equity awards is market competitive and strongly aligns the incentives of our executives with the interests of our stockholders and the long-term performance of the Company by directly tying a significant portion of the value that may be realized from our equity compensation to the performance of the Company and the value of our stock.
Notice In 2021, we increased the weighting of Annual Meeting of StockholdersPSUs for our CEO's annual equity grant to 60% PSUs from the 50% we used historically and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
for other named executive officers. Both RSUs and PSUs are typically granted in
March.March of each fiscal year. RSUs vest based on continued service in equal annual installments over four years. PSUs have three-year cliff vesting based on performance as well as continued service with the Company. Please note that for newly hired executives, the timing of the grants and mix may vary based on the timing of the hire and other potential factors as part of the recruitment of each executive.
During fiscal year
2020,2021, our compensation and talent committee approved the RSU and PSU awards set forth in the table below to each of our named executive officers.
The payout opportunity on the PSUs to be earned at the end of the three-year performance period ranges from 0% for below threshold performance to 200% of the target opportunity for achieving the maximum level of performance. For
PSUs granted in 2020,2021, at threshold performance, 25% of the target amount is earned and, at target performance 100% of the target awards is earned. Linearand linear interpolation is used to determine the percentage of the PSUs earned where achievement is between threshold and target and between target and maximum performance levels.The number of PSUs actually earned will be determined at the end of the three-year performance period by measuring the Company’s actual 20202021 to 20222023 cumulative financial performance against the target performance.| | | Grant Date
Fair Value
($) | | RSUs (#) | | PSUs
(# at Threshold)
(25% of Target) | | PSUs
(# at Target) | | PSUs
(# at Maximum)
(200% of Target) |
| Colin M. Angle | | 3,851,978 | | 41,180 | | 10,295 | | 41,180 | | 82,360 |
| Julie Zeiler(1) | | 1,526,012 | | 16,314 | | 4,079 | | 16,314 | | 32,628 |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | 1,130,150 | | 12,082 | | 3,021 | | 12,082 | | 24,164 |
| Tim Saeger(2) | | 1,231,828 | | 13,169 | | 3,292 | | 13,169 | | 26,338 |
| Keith Hartsfield | | 462,368 | | 4,943 | | 1,236 | | 4,943 | | 9,886 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | 923,895 | | 9,877 | | 2,469 | | 9,877 | | 19,754 |
| Alison Dean(3) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Grant Date Fair Value ($) | RSUs (#) | PSUs (# at Threshold) (25% of Target) | PSUs (# at Target) | PSUs (# at Maximum) (200% of Target) |
| Colin Angle | 5,418,537 | 18,163 | 6,811 | 27,245 | 54,490 |
| Julie Zeiler | 1,477,782 | 6,192 | 1,548 | 6,192 | 12,384 |
| Glen Weinstein | 1,280,650 | 5,366 | 1,341 | 5,366 | 10,732 |
| Jean Jacques Blanc | 1,231,486 | 5,160 | 1,290 | 5,160 | 10,320 |
Faris Habbaba(1) | 2,214,919 | 23,113 | — | — | — |
| | | | | |
| |
| (1) | Ms. Zeiler was promoted to EVP, Chief Financial Officer on May 4, 2020. |
(2) | Mr. Saeger resigned as an officer of the Company effective September 14, 2020, andHabbaba received a time-based RSU grant upon his last day of employment with us was March 26,hire in 2021. |
(3) | Ms. Dean He did not receive anya PSU or RSU awardsgrant in 2020. Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020 and her employment with the Company terminated on August 28, 2020. All of the PSU and RSU awards granted to her were forfeited in connection with such termination.2021. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
The following chart depicts the mix of PSUs and RSUs in our annual long-term incentive program for
2020: 
2021:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| * | Excludes Mr. Habbaba new hire award | |
Performance Share Units
The Company’s and the compensation and talent committee’s overall goals for selecting metrics for the PSU component of the long-term incentive program include:
| ● | Alignment with business strategy; |
| ● | Alignment with stockholder interest in improving long-term business fundamentals; |
| ● |
•Alignment with business strategy; •Alignment with stockholder interest in improving long-term business fundamentals; •Correlation with total stockholder return; and •Complementary to our short-term incentive metrics and measurement period.
For 2022, we introduced a new PSU plan pursuant to which PSUs are earned based on our relative total shareholder return ("TSR") over one, two, three-year periods, with a potential for an adjustment based on three-year profitability.To earn the target payment under this new plan, iRobot must outperform the TSR of a broad market index, the Russell 2000. Payout under this plan is also capped at target if TSR is negative, with an overall payout cap of 200%.This puts a direct focus on shareholder value creation, and |
| ● | Complementary to our short-term incentive metrics and measurement period. |
For 2020, the compensation and talent committee determined that Non-GAAP Operating Income was a more optimal metric for our PSUs in large part because Non-GAAP Operating Income is a key financial measure that can be reasonably forecasted over the relevant performance period and reflects the operating performance of our management team. We believe using Non-GAAP Operating Income over a multi-year period for our PSUs, coupled with the annual Revenue component of our short-term incentive plan, that includes annual revenue and non-GAAP operating income performance metrics, provides a strong focus on, and balance between important short-short and long-term business drivers.
PSUs granted in
20202021 will be measured and
vestedvest only if earned at the end of the three-year performance period based upon performance over the entire three-year period. As shown in the table below, the number of shares earned at the end of the three-year period will range from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted based on the Company’s performance against a three-year cumulative
Non-GAAP Operating Incomenon-GAAP operating income goal. This goal was established at the beginning of the three-year performance period. The following table outlines the threshold, target, and maximum
Non-GAAP Operating Incomenon-GAAP operating income goals for the three-year performance period covering 2020 through 2022.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating Income Performance (in millions) |
2021-2023 PSU Performance Cycle | Threshold(70%) | Target Range (100% to 105%) | Maximum (130%) |
| Cumulative Non-GAAP Operating Income ($M) | $554 | $792-$832 | $1,030 |
| PSUs Eligible for Vesting | 25% | 100% | 200% |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement2020-2022
PSU Performance Cycle | | Operating Income Performance (in millions) |
| | Threshold
(70%) | | Target Range
(100% to 110%) | | Maximum (130%) |
| Cumulative Non-GAAP Operating Income ($M) | | $250 | | $357-$393 | | $464 |
| PSUs Eligible for Vesting | | 25% | | 100% | | 200% |
For the PSUs granted in
2018,2019, the number of shares earned at the end of the three-year performance period could have ranged from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted based on the Company’s performance against a three-year cumulative operating income goal. The following table outlines the
GAAP operating income threshold, target, and maximum goals, along with the
Company’sCompany's actual performance for the three-year performance period from
20182019 through
2020.2021. Payout achievement is shown in the table.
2018-2020
PSU Performance Cycle | | Operating Income Performance (in millions) | | | | |
| | Threshold | | Target Range | | Maximum | | Actual
Performance
Achieved | | Actual
Payout Level |
| Cumulative | | $285 | | $321-$392 | | $428 | | $338.7 | | 100% |
| PSUs Eligible for Vesting | | 50% | | 100% | | 200% | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating Income Performance (in millions) |
2019-2021 PSU Performance Cycle | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual Performance Achieved | Actual Payout Level |
| Cumulative | $347 | $391 | $521 | $231.8 | 0% |
| PSUs Eligible for Vesting | 50% | 100% | 200% | | |
For the
20182019 PSUs, the three-year cumulative operating income achievement was
$338.7$231.8 million, which fell
withinbelow the
target rangethreshold of
$321 million to $392$347 million; therefore
100% of theno PSUs granted in
20182019 were deemed earned and vested.
Specifically,The table below outlines the
named-executive officers earneddetails. Mr. Habbaba was excluded from the
following PSUs with respect totable below because he joined the
PSUs grantedCompany in
2018:| | | 2018-2020 PSUs At Threshold, Target & Maximum |
| | | PSUs At Threshold | | PSUs At Target | | PSUs Maximum | | Total PSUs Earned |
| Colin M. Angle | | 14,573 | | 29,146 | | 58,292 | | 29,146 |
| Julie Zeiler | | 282 | | 564 | | 1,128 | | 564 |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | 3,429 | | 6,858 | | 13,716 | | 6,858 |
| Tim Saeger(1) | | 2,571 | | 5,143 | | 10,286 | | 5,143 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | 2,742 | | 5,486 | | 10,972 | | 5,486 |
| Alison Dean(2) | | 4,972 | | 9,944 | | 19,888 | | — |
(1) | Mr. Saeger resigned as an officer of the Company effective September 14, 2020, and his last day of employment with us was March 26, 2021. |
(2) | Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020 and her employment with the Company terminated on August 28, 2020, and all of the PSUs granted to her in 2018 were forfeited in connection with such termination. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders2021 and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
did not hold any 2019 PSUs. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019-2021 PSUs At Threshold, Target & Maximum |
| | PSUs At Threshold | PSUs At Target | PSUs At Maximum | Total PSUs Earned |
| Colin Angle | 11,360 | 22,720 | 45,440 | 0 |
| Julie Zeiler | 170 | 341 | 682 | 0 |
| Glen Weinstein | 2,499 | 4,498 | 9,996 | 0 |
| Jean Jacques Blanc | 340 | 681 | 1,362 | 0 |
Other Benefits and Perquisites
We also have various broad-based employee benefit plans. Our executive officers participate in these plans on the same terms as other eligible employees, subject to any legal limits on the amounts that may be contributed by or paid to executive officers under these plans. We offer a 401(k) plan, which allows our U.S. employees an opportunity to invest in a wide array of funds on a pre-tax basis. The Company matches up to 3% of eligible pay ($0.50 on each dollar an employee contributes up to a maximum of 6%). In 2017, we established an employee stock purchase plan for the benefit of all of our U.S., UK and Canadian based employees. We do not provide pension arrangements or post-retirement health coverage for our named executive officers or other employees. We also maintain insurance and other benefit plans for our employees. We offer no perquisites to our executive officers
in the United States that are not otherwise available to all of our employees.
Mr. Blanc is provided with a car allowance, a housing allowance and a school allowance, with the housing allowance and school allowance having a tax gross-up on the imputed income, as an element of his compensation in his UK-based role in accordance with local market practice.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We maintain equity ownership guidelines to further align the interests of our senior management and directors with those of our stockholders. Under the guidelines, executives are expected to hold common stock that is valued at an amount ranging from two times base salary for our senior executives to six times base salary for our chief executive officer. Our directors are also expected to hold common stock in an amount equal to six times their current annual cash retainer fee for board service.
For purposes of these guidelines, stock ownership
includes shares for which the executive or director has direct or indirect ownership or control, including stock and in-the-money vested stock options, but does not includeexcludes unvested
restricted stock units or unvested stock options.equity awards. Executives and directors are expected to meet their ownership guidelines within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines. All executives and directors who have served the Company for five or more years are currently meeting their ownership targets, while those executives and directors with less than five years of service are either currently meeting or are making progress to achieve these ownership targets.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
42
Since 2005, we have had a written insider trading policy that applies to all of our employees, including officers, and directors. The policy, among other things, prohibits holding Company securities as collateral in a margin account, any hedging transactions, short sales, and puts/calls, and pledging of Company securities as collateral for a loan unless the pledge has been approved by the compensation and talent committee of the board of directors. To date, no such approval has been requested or given.
Executive Agreements
We have entered into executive agreements with each of our named executive officers. The executive agreements provide for severance payments equal to 50% of such officer’s annual base salary at the highest annualized rate in effect during the one-year period immediately prior to termination, payable in six equal monthly installments, as well as monthly premium payments for continued health, dental and vision benefits for up to six months following termination, in the event that we terminate his or her employment other than for cause, or his or her death or disability, as each term is defined in the executive agreements. In addition, these executive agreements provide that if we experience a change in control, as defined in the executive agreements, and the employment of such officer is terminated by the Company other than for cause or his or her death or disability at any time within the period beginning on the date that is 45 days prior to the date of the public announcement of the execution of a definitive agreement for a change in control and ending on the first anniversary of the effective date of the change in control, or if such officer terminates his or her employment for good
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
reason, as defined in the executive agreements, during the one-year period following the change in control, then all unvested equity held by such officer becomes fully-vested and immediately exercisable and such officer is entitled to severance payments equal to 200% of his or her annual base salary, at the highest annualized rate in effect during the period beginning in the year prior to the effective date of the change in control and ending on the date of termination of employment, and 200% of such officer’s highest target cash incentive with respect to the year prior to the year in which the change in control occurred and ending in the year in which the officer’s employment is terminated, each payable in 24 equal monthly installments, as well as monthly premium payments for continued health, dental and vision benefits for up to 24 months following termination. Receipt of the severance payments and benefits under the executive agreements is subject to the executive officer’s execution of a separation agreement, including a general release of claims, in a form and of a scope reasonably acceptable to the Company and compliance with any noncompetition, inventions and/or nondisclosure obligations owed to the Company. There are no tax gross-up payable under the executive agreements or otherwise.
Clawback Policy
In 2015, the Company adopted a clawback policy that provides the board of directors discretion to reduce the amount of future compensation (both cash and equity) payable to an executive of the Company for excess proceeds from incentive compensation received by such executive due to a material restatement of financial statements. The clawback period is the three-year period following the filing of any such restated financial statements with the SEC.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which was signed into law December 22, 2017, made a number of significant changes to Section 162(m) of the
Code.Internal Revenue of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Section 162(m) of the Code generally places a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation a company can deduct in any one year for certain executive officers. While we consider tax deductibility as one factor in determining executive compensation, the compensation and talent committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions, as noted above, and retains the flexibility to award compensation that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if the awards are not deductible by us for tax purposes.
Pursuant to the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, the exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our named executive officers and certain other individuals in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for the limited transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 that are not subsequently materially modified.
We believe that stockholder interests are best served if its discretion and flexibility in awarding compensation is not restricted, even though some compensation awards may result in non-deductible compensation expenses.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
43
Risk Oversight of Compensation Programs
As part of its annual review, the compensation and talent committee determined that our compensation program for executive officers is not structured to be reasonably likely to present a material adverse risk to us based on the following factors:
| ● |
•Our compensation program for executive officers is designed to provide a balanced mix of cash and equity and annual and longer-term incentives, including compensation based on the achievement of performance targets. |
Notice of Annual Meetingcash and equity and annual and longer-term incentives, including compensation based on the achievement of Stockholdersperformance targets.
•The base salary portion of compensation is designed to provide a steady income regardless of our stock price performance so executives do not feel pressured to focus primarily on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics.
•Our time-based RSU grants generally vest over four years.
•Our PSUs vest only if we achieve pre-determined significant long-term metrics designed to drive the long- term interests of our stockholders.
•PSU awards align the interests of our executive officers with the success of our business strategy.
•Maximum payout levels for cash and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statementequity incentives are capped. •We have adopted a clawback policy that applies to cash and equity incentive compensation. | | |
| ● | The base salary portion of compensation is designed to provide a steady income regardless of our stock price performance so executives do not feel pressured to focus primarily on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics. |
| ● | Our time-based RSU grants generally vest over four years. |
| ● | Our PSUs vest only if we achieve pre-determined significant long-term metrics designed to drive the long- term interests of our stockholders. |
| ● | PSU awards align the interests of our executive officers with the success of our business strategy. |
| ● | Maximum payout levels for cash and equity incentives are capped. |
| ● | We have adopted a clawback policy that applies to cash and equity incentive compensation. |
| ● | The compensation and talent committee engages an independent compensation consultant. |
| ● | Our executive incentive programs include multiple performance measurement periods. |
| ● | Our stock ownership guidelines align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. |
•The compensation and talent committee engages an independent compensation consultant.
•Our executive incentive programs include multiple performance measurement periods.
•Our stock ownership guidelines align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders.
Compensation Consultant Independence
Pursuant to its charter, the compensation and talent committee has the sole authority to retain, terminate, obtain advice from, oversee and compensate its outside advisors, including its compensation consultant.
The compensation and talent committee retained Pay Governance as its independent executive compensation consultant for
2020.2021. Pay Governance reports directly to the compensation and talent
committee, and the compensation and talent committee may replace Pay Governance or hireaugment Pay Governance by hiring additional consultants at any time. Pay Governance attends meetings of the compensation and talent committee, as requested, and communicates with the chairmanchair of the compensation and talent committee between meetings; however, the committee makes all decisions regarding the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.
Pay Governance provides various executive compensation services to the compensation and talent committee with respect to our executive officers and other key employees at the compensation and talent committee’s request. The services Pay Governance provides include advising the compensation and talent committee on the principal aspects of the executive compensation program and evolving best practices and providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of our program design and awards in relationship to our performance.
The compensation and talent committee reviews the services provided by its outside consultants and believes Pay Governance is independent in providing executive compensation consulting services. The compensation and talent committee conducted a specific review of its relationship with Pay Governance, and determined Pay Governance’s work for the compensation and talent committee did not raise any conflicts of interest, consistent with the guidance provided under the Dodd-Frank Act and by the SEC and Nasdaq. In making this determination, the compensation and talent considered the following factors:
•That Pay Governance did not provide any services to us or our management other than service to the compensation and talent committee noted(including compensation benchmarking for our senior leadership team), and their services were limited to executive compensation consulting;
•That fees paid by us to Pay Governance represented less than 1.0% of Pay Governance’s total revenue for the following: | ● | Pay Governance did not provide any services to us or our management other than service to the compensation and talent committee (including compensation benchmarking for our senior leadership team), and their services were limited to executive compensation consulting; |
| ● | Fees paid by us to Pay Governance represented less than 1.0% of Pay Governance’s respective total revenue for the period January 2020 through December 2020; |
| ● | Pay Governance maintains a Conflicts Policy and an Insider Trading Policy, which are provided to the compensation and talent committee with specific policies and procedures designed to ensure independence; |
period January 2021 through December 2021;
•Pay Governance maintains an Independence Policy that is provided to the compensation and talent committee with specific policies and procedures designed to ensure independence;
•Whether the Pay Governance consultants on our account had any business or personal relationship with our compensation and talent committee members;
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement | | |
| ● | None of the Pay Governance consultants on our account had any business or personal relationship with our compensation and talent committee members; |
| ● | None of the Pay Governance consultants on our account had any business or personal relationship with our executive officers; and |
| ● | None of the Pay Governance consultants on our account directly own shares of our stock. |
•Whether the Pay Governance consultants on our account had any business or personal relationship with our executive officers; and
•That Pay Governance's Independence Policy prohibits the consultants on our account from directly owning shares of our stock.
The compensation and talent committee continues to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant on a periodic basis.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
The following table sets forth summary compensation information for our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, the three other most highly compensated executive officers serving as executive officer as of January
2, 2021 and two former executive officers for the fiscal years indicated:1, 2022:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE —
2020| Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($)(1) | | Bonus ($)(2) | | Stock Awards ($)(3) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | | All Other Compensation ($)(5) | | Total
($) |
| Colin M. Angle | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | 2020 | | 825,000 | | — | | 3,851,977 | | 1,506,450 | | 9,258 | | 6,192,685 |
| | 2019 | | 813,462 | | — | | 5,552,768 | | 353,925 | | 8,400 | | 6,728,555 |
| | 2018 | | 742,308 | | — | | 3,987,756 | | 945,000 | | 8,250 | | 5,683,314 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Julie Zeiler(6) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | 2020 | | 382,123 | | — | | 1,526,012 | | 410,418 | | 9,258 | | 2,327,811 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | | 2020 | | 410,000 | | — | | 1,130,150 | | 510,450 | | 9,965 | | 2,060,565 |
| | 2019 | | 405,385 | | — | | 1,221,511 | | 103,935 | | 8,400 | | 1,739,231 |
| | 2018 | | 380,000 | | — | | 938,312 | | 311,220 | | 8,250 | | 1,637,782 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tim Saeger(7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Research & Development Officer | | 2020 | | 400,000 | | — | | 1,231,828 | | 431,600 | | 9,258 | | 2,072,686 |
| | 2019 | | 396,923 | | — | | 1,332,469 | | 101,400 | | 8,400 | | 1,839,192 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Keith Hartsfield | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Product Officer | | 2020 | | 400,000 | | 250,000 | | 462,368 | | 398,400 | | 133,231 | | 1,643,999 |
| | 2019 | | 121,539 | | 250,000 | | 1,968,782 | | 30,086 | | 72,643 | | 2,443,049 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Russell J. Campanello | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Communications | | 2020 | | 392,308 | | — | | 923,895 | | 431,600 | | 9,258 | | 1,757,060 |
| | 2019 | | 350,000 | | — | | 999,352 | | 88,725 | | 8,400 | | 1,446,477 |
| | 2018 | | 350,000 | | — | | 750,595 | | 286,650 | | 8,250 | | 1,395,495 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Alison Dean(8) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer | | 2020 | | 292,308 | | — | | — | | — | | 56,627 | | 348,935 |
| | 2019 | | 496,154 | | — | | 1,665,830 | | 156,000 | | 8,400 | | 2,326,384 |
| | 2018 | | 472,693 | | — | | 1,360,538 | | 478,800 | | 8,250 | | 2,320,281 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($)(1) | Bonus ($)(2) | Stock Awards ($)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) | All Other Compensation ($)(5) | Total ($) |
| Colin Angle | | | | | | | |
| Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director | 2021 | 846,154 | — | 5,418,537 | — | 8,700 | 6,273,391 |
| 2020 | 825,000 | — | 3,851,977 | 1,506,450 | 9,258 | 6,192,685 |
| 2019 | 813,462 | — | 5,552,768 | 353,925 | 8,400 | 6,728,555 |
| | | | | | | |
Julie Zeiler(6) | | | | | | | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | 2021 | 488,462 | — | 1,477,783 | — | 8,700 | 1,974,945 |
| 2020 | 382,123 | — | 1,526,012 | 410,418 | 9,258 | 2,327,811 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Glen Weinstein | | | | | | | |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | 2021 | 426,923 | — | 1,280,650 | — | 8,700 | 1,716,273 |
| 2020 | 410,000 | — | 1,130,150 | 510,450 | 9,965 | 2,060,565 |
| 2019 | 405,385 | — | 1,221,511 | 103,935 | 8,400 | 1,739,231 |
| | | | | | | |
Jean Jacques Blanc(7) | | | | | | | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer | 2021 | 409,897 | 100,000 | 1,231,486 | — | 154,676 | 1,896,059 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Faris Habbaba (8) | | | | | | | |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Research and Development Officer | 2021 | 223,462 | 216,896 | 2,214,919 | — | 3,823 | 2,659,100 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Represents salary earned in the fiscal years presented, which covered 52 weeks for fiscal year 2021, 53 weeks for fiscal year 2020 and 52 weeks for fiscal years 2019 and 2018.year 2019. |
| (2) | RepresentsFor Mr. Habbaba, represents a $75,000 sign on bonusesbonus paid to him upon his hire and a guaranteed pro-rated target bonus for the 2021 fiscal year in the amount of $141,896, each payable pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement. For Mr. Blanc, represents a one-time bonus paid to Mr. Hartsfield upon hireBlanc in recognition of performing two roles over an 18-month period during the pandemic, which required him to compensate him for unvested equity withcontinue being the leader of the EMEA region while taking on his new role as EVP, Chief Commercial Officer. Mr. Blanc’s bonus was converted to U.S. dollars using a prior employer thatconversion rate of £1.00 to $1.3849, which represents exchange rate at the time the bonus was forfeited.paid. |
| (3) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value for stock awards granted in the fiscal years ended January 1, 2022, January 2, 2021, and December 28, 2019, and December 29, 2018, as applicable, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”) disregarding any estimates of service-based forfeitures. For PSUs, the value reported includes the value of the award at the grant date based upon the probable |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
| outcome of the performance conditions. The value of PSUs at the grant date assuming that the highest level of the performance condition will be achieved, for the fiscal years ended January 1, 2022, January 2, 2021, and December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018 (as applicable), respectively, is $6,502,292, $3,851,978, $5,552,768 and $3,987,756$5,552,768 for Mr. Angle; $1,477,783, and $1,526,012 for Ms. Zeiler; $1,280,650, $1,130,150, $1,221,511, and $938,312$1,221,511, for Mr. Weinstein; $1,231,828, and $1,332,469$1,231,486, for Mr. Saeger; $1,968,782 and $462,368, for Mr. Hartsfield; and $923,895, $999,352, and $750,595 for Mr. Campanello. The value of PSUs at the grant date assuming that the highest level of the performance condition will be achieved, for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018 for Ms. Dean are $1,665,830 and $1,360,538, respectively.Blanc. See the information appearing in note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 20211, 2022 for certain assumptions made in the valuation of stock awards. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
46
| | | | | |
| (4) | Represents amounts paid in 2021 2020 and 2019,2020, respectively under the Company’s SEICP for performance in the fiscal years ended January 2, 2021, and December 28, 2019, and December 29, 2018, as applicable. |
| (5) | For 2020,2021, includes the amounts set forth in the table below, including 401(k) matching contributions and a “grossed up” work from home stipend for each of our named executive officers, that wasMr. Habbaba, provided to all employeesnew hires in the US.U.S. Excludes medical, group life insurance and certain other benefits received by the named executive officers in the U.S. that are available generally to all of our salaried employees. With respect to Mr. Blanc, the amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column include a car allowance, a housing allowance and a school allowance, with a tax gross-up on the imputed income with respect to the housing and school allowance. It also includes employer pension scheme contributions and costs associated with an international health plan. Mr. Blanc’s amounts were converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.3764, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal year 2021. |
| 401(k) Matching
Contributions
($) | | Work From Home
Stipend
($) | | Tax Gross-Up on
Work From Home
Stipend
($) | | Other
($)* |
| Colin M. Angle | 8,550 | | 500 | | 208 | | — |
| Julie Zeiler | 8,550 | | 500 | | 208 | | — |
| Glen D. Weinstein | 8,550 | | 500 | | 208 | | 708 |
| Tim Saeger | 8,550 | | 500 | | 208 | | — |
| Keith Hartsfield | 8,550 | | 500 | | 208 | | 123,973 |
| Russell J. Campanello | 8,550 | | 500 | | 208 | | — |
| Alison Dean | 8,550 | | — | | — | | 48,077 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 401(k) Matching Contributions ($) | Work From Home Stipend ($) | Tax Gross-Up on Work From Home Stipend ($) | Other ($)* |
| Colin Angle | 8,700 | — | — | — |
| Julie Zeiler | 8,700 | — | — | — |
| Glen Weinstein | 8,700 | — | — | — |
| Faris Habbaba | 3,113 | 500 | 210 | — |
| * | Amount represents (i) for Mr. Hartsfield, travel and lodging expenses, including airfare and expenses for use of our corporate apartment, related to travel between his home and the Company’s office in Massachusetts, (ii) for Ms. Dean, a vacation payout which was made upon the termination of her employment, and (iii) for Mr. Weinstein, a service award. | | | |
| Jean Jacques Blanc |
| Car Allowance ($) | 9,910 |
| Housing Allowance ($) | 38,550 |
| Tax Gross-Up on Housing Allowance ($) | 34,188 |
| School Allowance ($) | 16,517 |
| Tax Gross-Up on School Allowance ($) | 14,648 |
| Pension Scheme Contributions ($) | 24,462 |
| International Health Plan ($) | 16,401 |
| Total ($) | 154,676 |
| | | | | |
| (6) | Ms. Zeiler was promoted to EVP, Chief Financial Officer on May 4, 2020, and her 2020 annual base salary was adjusted at that time her base salary increased from $307,654 to reflect the$425,000. In 2021, her salary increased responsibilities with her new role.from $425,000 to $500,000 in recognition of strong performance and aligning to market. |
| (7) | For Mr. Saeger resigned as an officerBlanc’s, amounts reported in the “Salary” column and the “All Other Compensation” column were converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.3764, which represents the Company effective September 14, 2020, and his last day of employment with us was March 26, 2021.average exchange rate for the 2021 fiscal year. |
| (8) | Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020Mr. Habbaba employment commenced on June 7, 2021 and her employment with the Company terminated on August 28, 2020. The amount reported in the Salary“Salary” column represents herhis base salary earned in fiscal 2020 through the date of termination. Ms. Dean did not receive any equity awards in 2020 and all unvested RSU and PSU awards granted to her were forfeited in connection with such termination.2021. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
2020 Pay RatioUnder the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Company is required to disclose the annual total compensationTable of our median employee (excluding our chief executive officer), the annual total compensation of our principal executive officer, Chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer, Colin M. Angle, and the ratio of these two amounts.
In 2020, there was no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact the pay ratio. Accordingly, for purposes of calculating the pay ratio set forth below, we used the same median employee we identified for purposes of our 2018 pay ratio. The Company employed 1,032 employees as of December 29, 2018, when we identified the median employee in 2018.
In evaluating whether to re-determine the “median employee” for 2020, we concluded that changes to the employee population and employee compensation programs would not result in a significant change to the Company’s pay ratio disclosure. In particular, we considered the increase in headcount in fiscal 2019 and 2020, but determined that there was an overall equal distribution of newly hired employees above and below the median during the fiscal year. Accordingly, we believe that we may continue to use the previously-determined “median employee.” The Company employed 1,209 employees at the end of fiscal 2020 (January 2, 2021).
A Consistently Applied Compensation Measure was used to identify the median employee based on the sum of base pay/regular wages, overtime, bonus, commissions and equity grant date fair value. The Company elected to include bonus payments and equity awards given the broad participation rates in these programs across the employee population. Annualized salary rates for full-time employees and hourly pay rates and actual hours worked were used as reasonable estimates of salary/ wages.
Using the compiled data, the Company determined that the 2020 annual total compensation of our median employee as of January 2, 2021 was $131,939 and Mr. Angle’s annual total compensation for 2020 was $6,192,685 both of which were calculated in accordance with Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K. The ratio of these amounts was 47:1.
Notice of Annual Meeting of StockholdersContents and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in
20202021
The following table sets forth, for each of the named executive officers, information about grants of plan-based awards during fiscal year
2020:2021:
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS —
2020| | | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1) | | Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2) | | All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock | | Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option |
| Name | | Grant Date | | Threshold
($) | | Target
($) | | Maximum
($) | | Threshold
(#) | | Target
(#) | | Maximum
(#) | | or Units
(#)(3) | | Awards
($) |
| Colin M. Angle | | — | | 113,438 | | 907,500 | | 1,815,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 41,180 | | 1,925,989 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | 10,295 | | 41,180 | | 82,360 | | — | | 1,925,989 |
| Julie Zeiler | | — | | 33,641 | | 247,240 | | 494,479 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 16,314 | | 763,006 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | 4,078 | | 16,314 | | 32,628 | | — | | 763,006 |
| Glen Weinstein | | — | | 38,438 | | 307,500 | | 615,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 12,082 | | 565,075 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | 3,020 | | 12,082 | | 24,164 | | — | | 565,075 |
| Tim Saeger(4) | | — | | 32,500 | | 260,000 | | 520,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 13,169 | | 615,914 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | 3,292 | | 13,169 | | 26,338 | | — | | 615,914 |
| Keith Hartsfield | | — | | 30,000 | | 240,000 | | 480,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 4,943 | | 231,184 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | 1,235 | | 4,943 | | 9,886 | | — | | 231,184 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | — | | 32,500 | | 260,000 | | 520,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 9,877 | | 461,947 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | 2,469 | | 9,877 | | 19,754 | | — | | 461,947 |
| Alison Dean(5) | | — | | 50,000 | | 400,000 | | 800,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(3) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) |
| Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) |
| Colin Angle | — | 122,188 | 977,500 | 1,955,000 | — | — | — | — | — |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18,163 | 2,167,391 |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | 6,811 | 27,245 | 54,490 | — | 3,251,146 |
| Julie Zeiler | — | 46,875 | 375,000 | 750,000 | — | — | — | — | — |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,192 | 738,891 |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | 1,548 | 6,192 | 12,384 | — | 738,891 |
| Glen Weinstein | — | 40,313 | 322,500 | 645,000 | — | — | — | — | — |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,366 | 640,325 |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | 1,341 | 5,366 | 10,732 | — | 640,325 |
| Jean Jacques Blanc(4) | — | 38,840 | 310,722 | 621,445 | — | — | — | — | — |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,160 | 615,743 |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | 1,290 | 5,160 | 10,320 | — | 615,743 |
| Faris Habbaba(5) | — | — | 141,896 | 283,792 | — | — | — | — | — |
| | 6/11/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23,113 | 2,214,919 |
| | | | | |
| (1) | This reflects the threshold, target and maximum incentive cash payout levels established under our SEICP. The actualHowever, no amounts were actually earned or paid for fiscal year 2020 are disclosed in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.2021. |
| (2) | This reflects the threshold, target and maximum equity incentive payout levels associated with PSUs made pursuant to our 2018 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”"2018 Plan"), which amounts will be payable in shares of our common stock, if the performance metrics are achieved under the terms of the awards. |
| (3) | All stock awards granted were made pursuant to our 2018 Plan. |
| (4) | To the extent earned, Mr. Saeger resigned as an officerBlanc’s payouts under the SEICP would have been denominated and paid in British pounds, and the threshold, target and maximum amounts reported for Mr. LeBlanc under the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns have been converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.3764, which represents the Company effective September 14, 2020, and his last day of employment with us was March 26,average exchange rate for fiscal year 2021. |
| (5) | Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020 and herPursuant to the terms of Mr. Habbaba’s employment agreement with the Company, terminated on August 28, 2020. Accordingly, she did nothe was eligible to earn a bonus under the SEICPof up to 200% of his pro-rated target incentive bonus opportunity for 2020. In addition, she did not receive any equity awards in 2020, and all unvested RSU and PSU awards granted2021 but he received a guaranteed a minimum bonus for 2021 equal to her were forfeited in connection with such termination.100% of his 2021 pro-rated target incentive opportunity |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth, for each of the named executive officers, information about unexercised option awards and other unvested equity awards that were held as of January
2, 2021.1, 2022.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END —
2020| | | | | Option Awards | | Equity Incentive Plan |
| Name | | Grant
Date | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable | | Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(1) | | Option
Exercise
Price
($) | | Option
Expiration
Date | | Number
of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2) | | Market Value
of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
($)(3) | | Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(4) | | Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards;
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(3) |
| Colin M. Angle | | 3/7/2014 | | 15,475 | | — | | 43.35 | | 3/7/2021 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 6/6/2014 | | 19,700 | | — | | 35.43 | | 6/6/2021 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/6/2015 | | 23,238 | | — | | 34.30 | | 3/6/2022 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 6/5/2015 | | 23,350 | | — | | 32.38 | | 6/5/2022 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/11/2016 | | 36,013 | | — | | 33.14 | | 3/11/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 6/10/2016 | | 30,950 | | — | | 37.62 | | 6/10/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/10/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 9,056 | | 727,106 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/9/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 14,572 | | 1,169,986 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/8/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 17,040 | | 1,368,142 | | 11,360 | | 912,094 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 41,180 | | 3,306,342 | | 82,360 | | 6,612,684 |
| Julie Zeiler(5) | | 3/10/2017 | | 5,578 | | 372 | | 57.33 | | 3/10/2024 | | 1,456 | | 116,902 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/9/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 848 | | 68,086 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/8/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 767 | | 61,582 | | 170 | | 13,649 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 16,314 | | 1,309,851 | | 32,628 | | 2,619,702 |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | 3/11/2016 | | 8,500 | | — | | 33.14 | | 3/11/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 6/10/2016 | | 7,325 | | — | | 37.62 | | 6/10/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/10/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 1,943 | | 156,003 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/9/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,428 | | 275,234 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/8/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,748 | | 300,927 | | 2,499 | | 200,645 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 12,082 | | 970,064 | | 24,164 | | 1,940,128 |
| Tim Saeger(6) | | 9/4/2015 | | 18,350 | | — | | 29.60 | | 9/4/2022 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/11/2016 | | 1,202 | | — | | 33.14 | | 3/11/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 6/10/2016 | | 1,246 | | — | | 37.62 | | 6/10/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/10/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 2,068 | | 166,040 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/9/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 2,571 | | 206,426 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/8/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 4,089 | | 328,306 | | 2,726 | | 218,871 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 13,169 | | 1,057,339 | | 26,338 | | 2,114,678 |
| Keith Hartsfield | | 9/6/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 23,762 | | 1,907,851 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 4,943 | | 396,873 | | 9,886 | | 793,747 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | 6/5/2015 | | 292 | | — | | 32.38 | | 6/5/2022 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/11/2016 | | 1,559 | | — | | 33.14 | | 3/11/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 6/10/2016 | | 1,679 | | — | | 37.62 | | 6/10/2023 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | 3/10/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 1,618 | | 129,909 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/9/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 2,742 | | 220,155 | | — | | — |
| | | 3/8/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,066 | | 246,169 | | 2,044 | | 164,113 |
| | | 3/6/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 9,877 | | 793,024 | | 19,754 | | 1,586,049 |
| Alison Dean(7) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Option Awards | | Equity Incentive Plan |
| Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (1) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(3) |
| Colin Angle | 3/06/2015 | 23,238 | — | 34.30 | 3/06/2022 | | — | — | — | — |
| | 6/05/2015 | 23,350 | — | 32.38 | 6/05/2022 | | — | — | — | — |
| | 3/11/2016 | 36,013 | — | 33.14 | 3/11/2023 | | — | — | — | — |
| | 6/10/2016 | 30,950 | — | 37.62 | 6/10/2023 | | — | — | — | — |
| | 3/09/2018 | — | — | — | — | | 7,286 | 480,002 | — | — |
| | 3/08/2019 | — | — | — | — | | 11,360 | 748,397 | — | — |
| | 3/06/2020 | — | — | — | — | | 30,885 | 2,034,704 | 10,295 | 678,235 |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | | 18,163 | 1,196,578 | 6,811 | 448,709 |
| Julie Zeiler | 3/10/2017 | 5,950 | — | 57.33 | 3/10/2024 | | — | — | — | — |
| | 3/09/2018 | — | — | — | — | | 424 | 27,933 | — | — |
| | 3/08/2019 | — | — | — | — | | 511 | 33,665 | — | — |
| 3/06/2020 | — | — | — | — | | 12,235 | 806,042 | 4,078 | 268,659 |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | | 6,192 | 407,929 | 1,548 | 101,982 |
| Glen Weinstein | 3/09/2018 | — | — | — | — | | 1,714 | 112,918 | — | — |
| | 3/08/2019 | — | — | — | — | | 2,498 | 164,568 | — | — |
| | 3/06/2020 | — | — | — | — | | 9,061 | 596,939 | 3,020 | 198,958 |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | | 5,366 | 353,512 | 1,341 | 88,345 |
| Jean Jacques Blanc | 3/11/2016 | 256 | — | 33.14 | 3/11/2023 | | — | — | — | — |
| | 6/10/2016 | 380 | — | 37.62 | 6/10/2023 | | — | — | — | — |
| 3/09/2018 | — | — | — | — | | 642 | 42,295 | — | — |
| 3/08/2019 | — | — | — | — | | 1,022 | 67,329 | — | — |
| 3/06/2020 | — | — | — | — | | 11,122 | 732,717 | 3,707 | 244,217 |
| | 3/12/2021 | — | — | — | — | | 5,160 | 339,941 | 1,290 | 84,985 |
| Faris Habbaba | 6/11/2021 | — | — | — | — | | 23,113 | 1,522,684 | — | — |
| (1) | Stock option grants vest over a four-year period, at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) on the first anniversary of the grant date, and the remainder in equal quarterly installments thereafter. |
| (2) | RSU awards vest over a four-year period, at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) on each anniversary of the grant date. |
| (3) | Amounts disclosed in this column were calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2020,2021, the last business date of the fiscal year ended January 2, 2021.1, 2022. |
| (4) | PSU awards will be earned and vest at the end of a three-year cumulative period. For additional information on the PSU awards, see the section above entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentives.” |
(5) | Ms. Zeiler was promoted to EVP, Chief Financial Officer on May 4, 2020. |
(6) | Mr. Saeger resigned as an officer of the Company effective September 14, 2020, and his last day of employment with us was March 26, 2021. |
(7) | Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020 and her employment with the Company terminated on August 28, 2020. She did not receive any equity awards in 2020, and all unvested RSU and PSU awards granted to her were forfeited in connection with such termination. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
49
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth, for each of the named executive officers, information with respect to the exercise of stock options and the vesting of RSU awards and
PSUsPSU awards during the year ended January
2, 2021.1, 2022.
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED —
2020| | | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
| Name | | Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise(#) | | Value
Realized on
Exercise($)(1) | | Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(#) | | Value
Realized on
Vesting($)(2) |
| Colin M. Angle | | 36,175 | | 951,041 | | 62,349 | | 2,509,377 |
| Julie Zeiler(3) | | — | | — | | 2,136 | | 85,922 |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | 9,812 | | 423,099 | | 13,832 | | 556,605 |
| Tim Saeger(4) | | — | | — | | 12,422 | | 500,175 |
| Keith Hartsfield | | — | | — | | 7,921 | | 565,639 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | — | | — | | 11,153 | | 448,848 |
| Alison Dean(5) | | 10,429 | | 483,644 | | 29,050 | | 1,418,082 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise(#) | Value Realized on Exercise($)(1) | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(#) | Value Realized on Vesting($)(2) |
| Colin Angle | 35,175 | 2,093,968 | | 61,463 | 7,113,783 |
| Julie Zeiler | — | — | | 6,780 | 803,128 |
| Glen Weinstein | 15,825 | 1,320,274 | | 14,786 | 1,714,029 |
| Jean Jacques Blanc | 1,118 | 101,364 | | 6,525 | 771,346 |
| Faris Habbaba | — | — | | — | — |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Amounts disclosed in this column were calculated based on the difference between the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options in accordance with regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act. |
| (2) | Amounts disclosed in this column were calculated based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of settlement following vesting. |
(3) | Ms. Zeiler was promoted to EVP, Chief Financial Officer on May 4, 2020. |
(4) | Mr. Saeger resigned as an officer of the Company effective September 14, 2020, and his last day of employment with us was March 26, 2021. |
(5) | Ms. Dean resigned as EVP, Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2020 and her employment with the Company terminated on August 28, 2020. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Potential Benefits Upon Termination or Change in Control
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements in General
The Company has entered into executive agreements with each of the named executive officers, the terms of which are described in further detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section above.
Cash Payments and/or Acceleration of Vesting Following Certain Termination Events
Assuming the employment of our named executive officers was terminated without cause (not in connection with a change in control) on January
2, 2021,1, 2022, our named executive officers would be entitled to cash payments in the amounts set forth opposite their names in the table below, subject to any deferrals required under Section 409A of the Code.
Ms. Dean has been omitted from the below tables because her employment with the Company terminated on August 28, 2020 and she did not receive any severance payments or benefits in connection with such termination.| | | Base
Salary
($) | | Continuation of
Health Plan
Premium
Payments
($) | | Total
($) |
| Colin M. Angle | | 412,500 | | 15,391 | | 427,891 |
| Julie Zeiler | | 212,500 | | 10,112 | | 222,612 |
| Glen D. Weinstein | | 205,000 | | 11,681 | | 216,681 |
| Tim Saeger | | 200,000 | | 7,843 | | 207,843 |
| Keith Hartsfield | | 200,000 | | 15,391 | | 215,391 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | 200,000 | | 15,391 | | 215,391 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Base Salary ($) | Continuation of Health Plan Premium Payments ($) | Total ($) |
| Colin Angle | 425,000 | 15,825 | 440,825 |
| Julie Zeiler | 250,000 | 10,395 | 260,395 |
| Glen Weinstein | 215,000 | 12,004 | 227,004 |
Jean Jacques Blanc(1) | 207,148 | 12,698 | 219,846 |
| Faris Habbaba | 207,500 | 4,002 | 211,502 |
| | | | | |
| |
| |
| (1) | Mr. Blanc’s base salary and health continuation payments are payable in British pounds and have been converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.3764, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal year 2021. |
Assuming the employment of our named executive officers was terminated by the Company without cause during the period beginning on the date that is 45 days prior to the date of the public announcement of the execution of a definitive agreement for a change in control and ending on the first anniversary of the effective date of the change in control, or such officers resigned with good reason during the one-year period following a change in control and that such termination or resignation occurred on January 2, 2021,1, 2022, our named executive officers would be entitled to cash payments in the amounts set forth opposite their names in the below table, subject to any delay in payment required under Section 409A of the Code, and acceleration of vesting as set forth in the table below. The total amount payable to each executive
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
50
officer may be subject to reduction in certain circumstances if the amount would cause the executive officer to incur an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. The following table provides the market value (that is, the value based upon our stock price on December 31,
2020, minus the exercise price, if any)2021) of
stock options and RSUs or PSUs that would become exercisable or vested as a result of these acceleration events as of January
2, 2021.| Name | | Base
Salary
($) | | Bonus
($) | | Continuation
of Health
Plan
Premium
Payments ($) | | Market
Value of
Stock
Options
($) | | Market
Value of
RSUs and PSUs
($) | | Total
($) |
| Colin M. Angle | | 1,650,000 | | 1,815,000 | | 61,565 | | — | | 14,042,239 | | 17,568,804 |
| Julie Zeiler | | 850,000 | | 637,500 | | 40,449 | | 8,541 | | 2,939,015 | | 4,475,506 |
| Glen Weinstein | | 820,000 | | 615,000 | | 46,724 | | — | | 3,624,210 | | 5,105,934 |
| Tim Saeger | | 800,000 | | 520,000 | | 31,373 | | — | | 3,666,122 | | 5,017,945 |
| Keith Hartsfield | | 800,000 | | 480,000 | | 61,565 | | — | | 2,701,598 | | 4,043,163 |
| Russell J. Campanello | | 800,000 | | 520,000 | | 61,565 | | — | | 2,951,059 | | 4,332,624 |
1, 2022.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Base Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Continuation of Health Plan Premium Payments ($) | Market Value of Stock Options ($) | Market Value of RSUs and PSUs ($) | Total ($) |
| Colin Angle | 1,700,000 | 1,955,000 | 63,301 | — | 10,464,313 | 14,182,614 |
| Julie Zeiler | 1,000,000 | 750,000 | 41,580 | — | 2,780,729 | 4,572,309 |
| Glen Weinstein | 860,000 | 645,000 | 48,016 | — | 2,706,680 | 4,259,696 |
Jean Jacques Blanc(1) | 828,593 | 621,445 | 50,793 | — | 2,544,088 | 4,044,919 |
Faris Habbaba | 830,000 | 498,000 | 16,008 | — | 1,522,684 | 2,866,692 |
| | | | | |
| |
| |
| (1) | Mr. Blanc’s base salary and health continuation payments are payable in British pounds and have been converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.3764, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal year 2021. |
2021 Pay Ratio
Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Company is required to disclose the annual total compensation of our median employee (excluding our chief executive officer), the annual total compensation of our principal executive officer, Chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer, Colin Angle, and the ratio of these two amounts.
The Company selected January 1, 2022, the last day of our most recently-completed fiscal year, as the date upon which the median employee was identified. As of this date, the Company employed 1,372 employees globally, excluding 31 individuals that became employees as a result of the November 2021 acquisition of Aeris. The Company included all of our other full-time employees, part-time employees and interns, excluding the chief executive officer, in our analysis to identify the median employee. The Company did not elect to make any other exclusions as permitted under the SEC de minimis rule.
A Consistently Applied Compensation Measure was used to identify the median employee based on the sum of base pay/regular wages, overtime, bonus, commissions and equity grant date fair value. The Company elected to include bonus payments and equity awards given the broad participation rates in these programs across the employee population. Annualized salary rates for full-time employees and hourly pay rates and actual hours worked were used as reasonable estimates of salary/ wages.
Using the compiled data, the Company determined that the 2021 annual total compensation of our median employee as of January 1, 2022 was $122,236 and Mr. Angle’s annual total compensation for 2021 was $6,273,391, both of which were calculated in accordance with Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K. The ratio of these amounts was 51:1.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
In connection with our efforts to attract and retain highly qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors, we maintain a cash and equity compensation policy for our non-employee members of our board of directors. In fiscal year
2020,2021, each non-employee member of our board of directors was entitled to the following cash compensation:
| | | | | |
Annual retainer for Boardboard membership | $ 55,000 |
| Annual retainer for lead independent director | $ 25,000 |
| Audit Committee |
|
| Annual retainer for committee membership | $ 12,500 |
| Additional retainer for committee chair | $ 12,500 |
| Compensation and Talent Committee | |
| Annual retainer for committee membership | $ 10,000 |
| Additional retainer for committee chair | $ 10,000 |
| Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | |
| Annual retainer for committee membership | $ 5,000 |
| Additional retainer for committee chair | $ 5,000 |
Pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program, each non-employee director may elect in advance to defer the receipt of these cash fees. During the deferral period, the cash fees will be deemed invested in stock units. The deferred compensation will be settled in shares of our common stock upon the termination of service of the director or such other time as may have been previously elected by the director. The shares will be issued from our 2018 Plan or a subsequent stock option and incentive plan approved by our stockholders.
In
2020,2021, each of our non-employee members of our board of directors was entitled to the following equity compensation:
At the end of the tenth week of the fiscal quarter in which our annual meeting of stockholders occurs, each re-elected non-employee director receives a grant of RSUs having a fair market value of $175,000, which vests in full on the first anniversary of such grant.
During 2021, the board directors determined that, beginning in May 2022, annual equity compensation for members for our board of directors would be increased to $200,000 to be prorated for any new non-employee directors.
All of our directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board of directors.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
52
The following table provides compensation information for the fiscal year ended January
2, 20211, 2022 for each non-employee member of our board of directors. The table excludes Mr. Angle, who is a named executive officer of the Company and did not receive any additional compensation for his service as director in
2020.2021.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE — 2021
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Total ($) |
Mohamad Ali(2) | 85,000 | 174,986 | 259,986 |
Michael Bell(3) | 71,117 | 174,986 | 246,103 |
| Deborah Ellinger | 65,000 | 174,986 | 239,986 |
Elisha Finney(4) | 68,234 | 174,986 | 243,220 |
Karen Golz(5) | 8,071 | 90,572 | 98,643 |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | 65,000 | 174,986 | 239,986 |
| Eva Manolis | 67,500 | 174,986 | 242,486 |
| Andrew Miller | 85,000 | 174,986 | 259,986 |
| Michelle Stacy | 68,891 | 174,986 | 243,877 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE — 2020
| Name | | Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($) | | Stock Awards
($)(1) | | Total
($) |
| Mohamad Ali(2) | | 85,000 | | 174,988 | | 259,988 |
| Michael Bell | | 75,000 | | 174,988 | | 249,988 |
| Deborah G. Ellinger | | 65,000 | | 174,988 | | 239,988 |
| Elisha Finney | | 77,500 | | 174,988 | | 252,488 |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | | 65,000 | | 174,988 | | 239,988 |
| Eva Manolis | | 67,500 | | 174,988 | | 242,488 |
| Andrew Miller | | 85,000 | | 174,988 | | 259,988 |
| Michelle V. Stacy | | 65,000 | | 174,988 | | 239,988 |
| (1) | Represents the grant date fair value of RSUs awarded in the fiscal year ended January 2, 20211, 2022 in accordance with ASC Topic 718 disregarding any estimates of forfeitures. The grant date fair value is the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant multiplied by the number of shares of common stock underlying such RSU award. |
| (2) | Mr. Ali deferred all$63,750 of his 20202021 cash compensation pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program under which he received stock units in lieu of cash. |
| (3) | Mr. Bell will not be standing for re-election to the board of directors. Mr. Bell's term on the board will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders. |
| (4) | Ms. Finney resigned from our board of directors on November 17, 2021. |
| (5) | Ms. Golz was appointed to the board of directors in November 2021 and received a prorated stock award in December connected with her appointment. |
The non-employee members of our board of directors who held such position on January 2, 20211, 2022, held the following aggregate number of unvested RSUs as of such date:
Name | | Number of
Unvested
Restricted Stock
Units | | | |
| Name | Number of Unvested Restricted Stock Units |
| Mohamad Ali | | 2,1341,826 |
| Michael Bell | | 2,1341,826 |
Deborah G. Ellinger | | 2,1341,826 |
Elisha FinneyKaren Golz | | 3,0931,348 |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | | 3,4942,506 |
| Eva Manolis | | 2,1341,826 |
| Andrew Miller | | 2,1341,826 |
Michelle V. Stacy | | 2,134 |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of January 2, 2021 regarding shares of common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans, consisting of the iRobot Corporation 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, the 2015 Plan, the 2018 Plan and our 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). We have no equity compensation plans that were not approved by security holders.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
| Plan Category | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, units and rights (a) | | | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, units and rights (b) | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities referenced in column (a))(c) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | 1,356,363 | (1) | | $36.39 | | 1,562,092 | (2) |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | — | | | — | | — | |
| Total | | 1,356,363 | | | $36.39 | | 1,562,092 | |
| (1) | Includes 232,678 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options, 894,033 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs, and 229,652 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of PSUs if specified performance metrics are achieved. |
| (2) | As of January 2, 2021, there were no shares available for grants under the 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, the Evolution Robotics, Inc. 2007 Stock Plan or the 2015 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. As of January 2, 2021, there were 1,562,092 shares available under the 2018 Plan and 508,667 shares available under the ESPP. |
Transactions with Related Persons
In 2020,2021, there was no transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of five percent or
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
53
more of any class of our capital stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Our board of directors has adopted a written related party transaction approval policy, which sets forth our policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of any transaction required to be reported in our filings with the SEC. Our policy with regard to related party transactions is that all related party transactions are to be reviewed by our general counsel, who will determine whether the contemplated transaction or arrangement requires the approval of the board of directors, the nominating and corporate governance committee, both or neither.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
The audit committee of the board of directors has retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), independent registered public accounting firm, to serve as independent registered public accountants for our
20212022 fiscal year. PwC has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 1999. The Company is asking stockholders to ratify the selection by the audit committee of the board of directors of PwC as our independent auditors for the
20212022 fiscal year. Although ratification by the stockholders is not required by law, the board of directors has determined that it is desirable to request approval of this selection by the stockholders as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of PwC, the audit committee will consider this factor when making any determinations regarding PwC.
As provided in the audit committee charter, the audit committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditors for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company. Each year, the audit committee considers whether to retain PwC and whether such service continues to be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. Among other things, the audit committee considers:
| ● | the quality and scope of the audit; |
| ● | the independence of PwC; |
| ● | the performance of the lead engagement partner, the number of people staffed on the engagement team, and the quality of the engagement team, including the quality of the audit committee’s ongoing communications with and the capability and expertise of the team; |
| ● | PwC’s tenure as our independent auditor and its familiarity with our global operations and business, accounting policies and practices, and internal controls over financial reporting; and |
| ● | external data relating to audit quality and performance, including recent PCAOB inspection reports available for PwC. |
•the quality and scope of the audit;
•the independence of PwC;
•the performance of the lead engagement partner, the number of people staffed on the engagement team, and the quality of the engagement team, including the quality of the audit committee’s ongoing communications with and the capability and expertise of the team;
•PwC’s tenure as our independent auditor and its familiarity with our global operations and business, accounting policies and practices, and internal controls over financial reporting; and
•external data relating to audit quality and performance, including recent PCAOB inspection reports available for PwC.
Based on this evaluation, the members of the audit committee and the board of directors believe that PwC is independent and that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to retain PwC to serve as its independent auditors for the fiscal year
2021.2022.
The audit committee is also responsible for selecting the lead engagement partner. The rules of the SEC and PwC’s policies require mandatory rotation of the lead engagement partner every five years. In 2020, the audit committee selected a new lead engagement partner to begin in the 2021 fiscal year. During 2020, the audit committee, including the chair of the audit committee, were directly involved in the selection of the new lead engagement partner. The process for selecting a new lead engagement partner was fulsome and allowed for thoughtful consideration of multiple candidates, each of whom met a list of specified criteria. The process included discussions between the chair of the audit committee and PwC as to all of the final candidates under consideration for the position, meetings with the full audit committee and management, and robust interviews with the final candidates.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-audit Services
The audit committee has implemented procedures under our audit committee pre-approval policy for audit and non-audit services (the “Pre-Approval Policy”) to ensure that all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided to us have been pre-approved by the audit committee. Specifically, the audit committee pre-approves the use of PwC for specified audit and non-audit services, within approved monetary limits. If a proposed service has not been pre-approved pursuant to the Pre-Approval Policy, then it must be specifically pre-approved by the audit committee before it may be provided by PwC. Any pre-approved services exceeding the pre-approved monetary limits require specific approval by the audit committee. For additional information concerning the audit committee and its activities with PwC, see “The Board of Directors and Its Committees” and “Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.”
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
55
Representatives of PwC attended all of the standard audit committee meetings in
2020.2021. We expect that a representative of PwC will attend the annual meeting, and the representative will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires. The representative will also be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Fees
The following table shows the aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PwC to us during the fiscal years ended January
1, 2022 and January 2,
2021 and December 28, 2019.| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Audit Fees | $ 1,470,034 | | $ 1,379,133 |
| Audit-Related Fees | 100,280 | | 19,080 |
| Tax Fees | 308,738 | | 695,413 |
| All Other Fees | 16,941 | | 1,800 |
| Total | $ 1,895,994 | | $ 2,052,176 |
2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2021 | | | 2020 |
| Audit Fees | $ | 1,800,642 | | | $ | 1,470,034 | |
| Audit-Related Fees | | 113,700 | | | 100,280 |
| Tax Fees | | 338,997 | | | 308,738 |
| All Other Fees | | — | | | 16,941 |
| Total | $ | 2,253,339 | | | $ | 1,895,994 | |
Audit Fees for both years consist of fees for professional services associated with the annual consolidated financial statements audit, statutory filings, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Consists of fees associated with services related to review of accounting for significant transactions and other services that were reasonably related to the performance of audits or reviews of our financial statements and were not reported above under “Audit Fees.”
Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for assistance with federal, state, local and international tax planning and compliance.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
All other fees include licenses to technical accounting research software and fees associated with services to perform an assessment of compliance with global privacy laws. The audit committee has determined that the provision of services described above to us by PwC is compatible with maintaining their independence.
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU
VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
AS IROBOT’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL
2021.2022.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION TO ELIMINATE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS
At our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders voted to request that our board of directors take the steps necessary so that each voting requirement in our existing amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “Existing Certificate”) and by-laws that calls for a greater than a simple majority vote be eliminated and replaced by a majority voting standard.
In each year from 2015 to
2020,2021, our nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors determined it was appropriate to propose the amendments described below, and included the proposal described below in our Proxy Statement for the respective annual meeting. As detailed in the table below, despite receiving the affirmative votes of a majority of holders of the outstanding shares at each annual meeting from 2015 to
2019,2021, in each year since 2015 the proposal failed to receive the affirmative vote of holders of 75% of the outstanding shares, which is required for approval.
| | Year | | For | | Against | | Abstentions | | Broker Non-Votes | |
| | 2020 | | 13,190,094 | | 161,387 | | 49,139 | | 6,772,725 | |
| | 2019 | | 18,492,812 | | 138,436 | | 40,470 | | 5,749,298 | |
| | 2018 | | 14,914,013 | | 86,022 | | 59,826 | | 6,363,508 | |
| | 2017 | | 18,913,736 | | 118,581 | | 53,434 | | 4,221,576 | |
| | 2016 | | 19,761,152 | | 326,257 | | 204,328 | | 202,522 | |
| | 2015 | | 17,179,055 | | 101,106 | | 33,543 | | 6,857,005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year | For | | Against | | Abstentions | Broker Non-Votes |
| 2021 | 19,969,407 | | 80,058 | | 39,726 | 3,554,106 |
| 2020 | 13,190,094 | | 161,387 | | 49,139 | 6,772,725 |
| 2019 | 18,492,812 | | 138,436 | | 40,470 | 5,749,298 |
| 2018 | 14,914,013 | | 86,022 | | 59,826 | 6,363,508 |
| 2017 | 18,913,736 | | 118,581 | | 53,434 | 4,221,576 |
| 2016 | 19,761,152 | | 326,257 | | 204,328 | 202,522 |
| 2015 | 17,179,055 | | 101,106 | | 33,543 | 6,857,005 |
Our board of directors continues to believe that the amendments to the Existing Certificate described below and set forth in the Certificate of Amendment attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A are in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders, and, in light of the strong support received at the 2015 to 20202021 annual meetings, our board of directors has unanimously adopted a resolution approving and declaring the advisability of the Certificate of Amendment, which changes the voting provisions in the Existing Certificate as follows:
Removal of Directors; Article VI, Section 5 - Currently, the approval of the holders of 75% or more of the shares of the Company entitled to vote at an election of directors is required to remove a director from office prior to the expiration of his or her term with cause. If this proposal is approved, stockholders will have the ability to remove a director from office prior to the expiration of his or her term with cause and the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of the Company entitled to vote at an election of directors, which is the lowest allowable vote threshold under Delaware law; provided, however, that if Proposal 4 is approved by stockholders, the ability to remove will be without cause.
By-law Amendments; Article VIII, Section 2 - Currently, the Existing Certificate allows stockholders to amend or repeal our by-laws if at least 75% of the shares of the Company entitled to vote on such matter vote in favor of the amendment or repeal. If this proposal is approved, stockholders will have the ability to amend our by-laws with the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares cast and entitled to vote on such matter (with “abstentions,” “broker non-votes,” and “withheld” votes not counted as a vote either “for” or “against” such amendment or repeal).
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
Amendments to Certain Provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation; Article IX - Currently, the approval of at least 75% of the shares of the Company entitled to vote on such matter is required to amend or repeal Articles V, VI, VII, VIII or IX of the Existing Certificate, which address, among other things, actions by written consent of stockholders, special meetings of stockholders requirements and procedures for electing and removing board members and filling vacancies, limitation of liability of directors, by-law amendments, and amendments of the Existing Certificate. If this proposal is approved, the threshold approval for stockholders to amend or repeal these provisions will be a vote of the majority of the outstanding shares of the Company entitled to vote on such amendment or repeal, which is the lowest allowable vote threshold under Delaware law.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
57
This description of the proposed amendments to our Existing Certificate is a summary and is qualified by the full text of the proposed Certificate of Amendment to our Existing Certificate, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A and is incorporated herein by reference.
To be approved, the proposed Certificate of Amendment requires an affirmative vote of holders of 75% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the record date. If approved, the Certificate of Amendment will become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which we would do promptly after the annual meeting.
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FORFOR" ” THE
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION TO ELIMINATE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
At our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders voted to request that our board of directors take the steps necessary to reorganize the board of directors into one class with each director subject to election each year. As part of the request, our stockholders proposed that the Company would have the option to phase such declassification in over three years.
In 2016, our board of directors, after carefully considering the advantages and disadvantages of reorganizing the board of directors into one class with each director subject to election each year, unanimously adopted a resolution approving and declaring the advisability of amendments to our Existing Certificate that would declassify our board of directors over a three-year period and provide for the annual election of all of our directors commencing at the 2017 annual meeting, subject to obtaining approval of such amendments by our stockholders at the 2016 annual meeting.
Despite receiving the affirmative votes of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares at the 2016 annual meeting, the proposal failed to receive the affirmative vote of holders of 75% of the outstanding shares, which is the required threshold for approval of the proposal.
In each year from 2016 to
2020,2021, our board of directors, after further careful consideration, unanimously adopted a resolution approving and declaring the advisability of amendments to our Existing Certificate that would immediately declassify our board of directors and provide for the annual election of all of our directors commencing at the next scheduled annual meeting, subject to obtaining approval of such amendments by our stockholders.
Despite receiving the affirmative votes of a majority of holders of the outstanding shares at each annual meeting from 2016 to
2019,2021, in each year since 2016 the proposal failed to receive the affirmative vote of holders of 75% of the outstanding shares, which is required for approval. The table below details the voting results on proposals to declassify our board of directors since 2016:
| | Year | | For | | Against | | Abstentions | | Broker Non-Votes | |
| | 2020 | | 13,230,665 | | 75,909 | | 94,046 | | 6,772,725 | |
| | 2019 | | 18,508,599 | | 114,069 | | 49,050 | | 5,749,298 | |
| | 2018 | | 14,932,946 | | 57,771 | | 69,144 | | 6,363,508 | |
| | 2017 | | 18,910,693 | | 121,045 | | 54,013 | | 4,221,576 | |
| | 2016 | | 19,752,012 | | 318,969 | | 220,756 | | 202,522 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year | For | Against | Abstentions | Broker Non-Votes |
| 2021 | 19,992,568 | 51,998 | 44,625 | 3,554,106 |
| 2020 | 13,230,665 | 75,909 | 94,046 | 6,772,725 |
| 2019 | 18,508,599 | 114,069 | 49,050 | 5,749,298 |
| 2018 | 14,932,946 | 57,771 | 69,144 | 6,363,508 |
| 2017 | 18,910,693 | 121,045 | 54,013 | 4,221,576 |
| 2016 | 19,752,012 | 318,969 | 220,756 | 202,522 |
Our board of directors continues to believe that the amendments to the Existing Certificate described below and set forth in the Certificate of Amendment attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B are in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders and has again unanimously adopted a resolution approving and declaring the advisability of amendments to our Existing Certificate to declassify the board of directors commencing at the 20222023 annual meeting, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders. If this Proposal 4 is approved by the stockholders, the terms for all directors will end at the 20222023 annual meeting, and commencing with the 20222023 annual meeting, all directors will be elected for one-year terms at each subsequent annual meeting. If this Proposal 4 is approved, any director appointed by the board of directors as a result of a newly created directorship or to fill a vacancy would hold office until the next occurring annual meeting.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
Article VI, Section 3 of our Existing Certificate currently provides that our directors are divided into three classes, with each class serving a three-year term. Under the proposed amendments to our Existing Certificate in this Proposal 4, Article VI, Section 3 of the Existing Certificate would be amended to eliminate the classified board structure. If the proposed amendments are approved, commencing with the
20222023 annual meeting of stockholders, all directors will stand for election for one-year terms expiring at the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders. In all cases, each director will hold office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. Any director appointed to the board of directors to fill a vacancy following the
20222023 annual meeting of stockholders will hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders following such appointment. Corresponding changes related to the declassification of the board will be made to Article VI, Section 4 of the Existing Certificate pertaining to vacancies on the board of directors. Article VI, Section 5 of the Existing Certificate, which currently provides that directors may be removed by stockholders only for cause, will also be amended to allow for removal of directors without cause. If the stockholders do not approve this Proposal 4, our board of directors will remain classified and our directors will continue to be subject to the classifications set forth in our Existing Certificate.
This description of the proposed amendments to our Existing Certificate is a summary and is qualified by the full text of the proposed Certificate of Amendment to our Existing Certificate, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B and is incorporated herein by reference.
To be approved, the proposed Certificate of Amendment requires an affirmative vote of holders of 75% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the record date. If approved, the proposed Certificate of Amendment will become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which we would do promptly after the annual meeting.
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION TO ELIMINATE THE PROHIBITION ON STOCKHOLDERS’ ABILITY TO
Our Existing Certificate and our by-laws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the board of directors.
As part of our board of directors’ ongoing review of corporate governance practices, the board of directors has reviewed and considered the advantages and disadvantages of permitting stockholders to call special meetings. Stockholder-called special meetings may divert management’s time away from the Company’s day-to-day operations and involve significant organization, distribution, legal and other costs, which may ultimately be counter to the best interest of the Company’s stockholders as a whole. The board of directors also recognizes that the ability to call special meetings would allow stockholders to convene to vote on matters outside of the annual meeting that are important to the Company’s growth and success. As a result, our board of directors believes that stockholders, or groups of stockholders, owning at least 25% of the Company’s outstanding
shares of common stock (the “Requisite Threshold”) should have the ability to call special meetings.
In each year from 2017 to
2020,2021, our board of directors unanimously adopted a resolution approving and declaring the advisability of an amendment to our Existing Certificate to eliminate the prohibition on stockholders’ ability to call a special meeting, subject to obtaining approval of such amendments by our stockholders.
As detailed in the table below, despite receiving the affirmative votes of a majority of holders of the outstanding shares at each annual meeting from 2017 to
2019,2021, in each year since 2017 the proposal failed to receive the affirmative vote of holders of 75% of the outstanding shares, which is the required threshold for approval of the proposal.
| | Year | | For | | Against | | Abstentions | | Broker Non-Votes | |
| | 2020 | | 13,232,040 | | 115,547 | | 53,033 | | 6,772,725 | |
| | 2019 | | 18,450,183 | | 119,269 | | 102,266 | | 5,749,298 | |
| | 2018 | | 14,945,267 | | 62,032 | | 52,562 | | 6,363,508 | |
| | 2017 | | 18,948,123 | | 97,937 | | 39,691 | | 4,221,576 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year | For | Against | Abstentions | Broker Non-Votes |
| 2021 | 19,994,600 | 50,028 | 44,563 | 3,554,106 |
| 2020 | 13,232,040 | 115,547 | 53,033 | 6,772,725 |
| 2019 | 18,450,183 | 119,269 | 102,266 | 5,749,298 |
| 2018 | 14,945,267 | 62,032 | 52,562 | 6,363,508 |
| 2017 | 18,948,123 | 97,937 | 39,691 | 4,221,576 |
Our board of directors continues to believe that the amendment to the Existing Certificate to eliminate the prohibition on stockholders’ ability to call a special meeting is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders and has again unanimously adopted a resolution approving and declaring the advisability of an amendment to our Existing Certificate to remove the first sentence of Article V, Section 2, which provides that special meetings may only be called by the affirmative vote of a majority of the board of directors, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders.
If this proposal is approved by the stockholders, we will make conforming amendments to our by-laws to establish the requirements and procedures for stockholders to call special meetings (the “By-law Amendment”). The By-law Amendment will provide that stockholders, or groups of stockholders, holding the Requisite Threshold may direct the Company’s Secretary to call special meetings.
The above description of the proposed amendment to our Existing Certificate is a summary and is qualified by the full text of the proposed Certificate of Amendment to our Existing Certificate, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C and is incorporated herein by reference.Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
To be approved, the proposed Certificate of Amendment requires an affirmative vote of holders of 75% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the record date. If approved, the proposed Certificate of Amendment will become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which we would do promptly after the annual meeting.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
61
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ELIMINATE THE PROHIBITION ON STOCKHOLDERS’ ABILITY TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement 62
PROPOSAL 6
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2018 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
The board of directors believes that stock-based incentive awards can play an important role in the success of the Company by encouraging and enabling the employees, officers, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the Company largely depends for the successful conduct of its business to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company. The board of directors believes that providing such persons with a direct stake in the Company assures a closer identification of the interests of such individuals with those of the Company and its stockholders, thereby stimulating their efforts on the Company’s behalf and strengthening their desire to remain with the Company.
The board of directors and the Company’s stockholders previously adopted the iRobot Corporation 2018 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, which was subsequently amended effective as of May 20, 2020 (the “2018 Plan”). On March 30, 2022, the board of directors adopted a second amendment to the 2018 Plan (the “Plan Amendment” and the 2018 Plan, as amended by the Plan Amendment, the “Amended 2018 Plan”), subject to stockholder approval, to increase the aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan by 925,000 shares, subject to adjustment as provided for in the Amended 2018 Plan. The Plan Amendment is designed to enhance the flexibility to grant equity awards to our officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants and to ensure that we can continue to grant equity awards to eligible recipients at levels determined to be appropriate by the board of directors and/or the compensation and talent committee. A copy of the 2018 Plan as amended by the Plan Amendment is attached as Annex D to this Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
We are requesting that shareholders approve the proposed Plan Amendment. If this proposal is approved by our stockholders at the 2022 Annual Meeting, the Plan Amendment providing for the additional 925,000 shares will become effective on the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting. If stockholders do not approve this proposal, the proposed 925,000 additional shares will not become available for issuance under the 2018 Plan. The 2018 Plan will otherwise remain in effect in accordance with its terms. In such event, the board of directors will consider whether to adopt alternative arrangements based on its assessment of our needs. We believe that the proposed share pool increase to the 2018 Plan pursuant to the Plan Amendment is reasonable, appropriate, and in the best interests of our stockholders.
As of March 31, 2022, there were stock options to acquire 109,507 shares of common stock outstanding under our equity compensation plans, with a weighted average exercise price of $36.49 and a weighted average remaining term of one year. In addition, as of March 31, 2022, there were 1,096,278 unvested full value awards with time-based vesting and 440,594 unvested full value awards with performance vesting outstanding at target under our equity compensation plans. Other than the foregoing, no awards under our equity compensation plans were outstanding as of March 31, 2022. As of March 31, 2022, there were 667,731 shares of common stock available for awards under our equity compensation plans.
Summary of Material Features of the Amended 2018 Plan
The material features of the Amended 2018 Plan are:
•The maximum number of shares of common stock to be issued under the Amended 2018 Plan is 3,420,000;
•The award of stock options (both incentive and non-qualified options), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, unrestricted stock, cash- based awards, and dividend equivalent rights and is permitted;
•Shares tendered or held back for taxes will not be added back to the reserved pool under the Amended 2018 Plan. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right that is settled in shares of common stock, the full number of shares underlying the award will be charged to the reserved pool. Additionally, shares we reacquire on the open market will not be added to the reserved pool under the Amended 2018 Plan;
•Stock options and stock appreciation rights will not be repriced in any manner without stockholder approval;
•The value of all awards awarded under the Amended 2018 Plan and all other cash compensation paid by us to any non-employee director in any calendar year may not exceed $750,000 and no more than 50,000
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
63
shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to awards under the Amended 2018 Plan to non-employee directors in any calendar year;
•Minimum vesting of one year required for all equity awards, other than a limited number of excepted awards under the Amended 2018 Plan;
•Any dividends or dividend equivalents payable with respect to any equity award are subject to the same vesting provisions as the underlying award;
•Any material amendment to the Amended 2018 Plan is subject to approval by our stockholders; and
•The term of the Amended 2018 Plan will expire on May 23, 2028.
Based solely on the closing price of our common stock as reported by Nasdaq on March 31, 2022 and the maximum number of shares that would have been available for awards as of such date under the Amended 2018 Plan had it been in effect on such date, the maximum aggregate market value of the common stock that could potentially be issued under the Amended 2018 Plan is $216,828,000. The shares of common stock underlying any awards that are forfeited, canceled or otherwise terminated, other than by exercise, under the Amended 2018 Plan or the iRobot Corporation 2015 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) will be added back to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the Amended 2018 Plan. Shares tendered or held back upon exercise of a stock option or settlement of an award under the Amended 2018 Plan to cover the exercise price or tax withholding and (ii) shares subject to a stock appreciation right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the stock appreciation right upon exercise thereof, will not be added back to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the Amended 2018 Plan. In addition, shares of common stock repurchased on the open market will not be added back to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the Amended 2018 Plan.
Rationale for Share Increase
The Plan Amendment is critical to our ongoing effort to build stockholder value. Equity incentive awards are an important component of our executive and non-executive employees’ compensation. Our compensation and talent committee and the board of directors believe that we must continue to offer a competitive equity compensation program in order to attract, retain and motivate the talented and qualified employees necessary for our continued growth and success.
We manage our long-term stockholder dilution by limiting the number of equity incentive awards granted annually. The compensation and talent committee carefully monitors our annual net burn rate, total dilution and equity expense in order to maximize stockholder value by granting only the number of equity incentive awards that it believes are necessary and appropriate to attract, reward and retain our employees. Our compensation philosophy reflects broad-based eligibility for equity incentive awards for high performing employees. By doing so, we link the interests of those employees with those of our stockholders and motivate our employees to act as owners of the business.
Burn Rate
The following table sets forth information regarding historical awards granted and earned for the 2019 through 2021 fiscal year period, and the corresponding burn rate, which is defined as the number of shares subject to equity-based awards granted in a year divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for that year, for each of the last three fiscal years:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Share Element | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 |
| Stock Options Granted | | — | | — | | — |
| Time-Based Full-Value Awards Granted | | 407,325 | | | 493,908 | | | 523,496 | |
| Performance-Based Full-Value Awards | | 70,827 | | | 130,284 | | | 134,127 | |
| Granted | |
| Performance-Based Full-Value Awards | | 78,943 | | | 71,734 | | | 55,503 | |
| Vested | | | |
| Total Awards Granted | | 478,152 | | | 624,192 | | | 657,623 | |
| Weighted average common shares | | 28,096,864 | | | 28,100,799 | | | 27,687,037 | |
| outstanding during the fiscal year | | | |
| Annual Burn Rate | | 1.70 | % | | 2.22 | % | | 2.38 | % |
| Three-Year Average Burn Rate | | | | 2.10 | % | | |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
64
The compensation and talent committee determined the size of the increase to the reserved pool under the Plan Amendment based on projected equity awards to anticipated new hires, projected annual equity awards to existing employees and an assessment of the magnitude of increase that our institutional investors and the firms that advise them would likely find acceptable. We anticipate that if our request to increase the share reserve is approved by our stockholders, it will be sufficient to provide equity incentives to attract, retain, and motivate employees for a period of three years or less following the effective date of the Plan Amendment.
Summary of the Amended 2018 Plan
The following description of certain features of the Amended 2018 Plan is intended to be a summary only. The summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2018 Plan, which was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 7, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference, the first amendment to the 2018 Plan, which was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 30, 2020, and is incorporated herein by reference, and the Plan Amendment, which is attached hereto as Annex D.
Administration. The Amended 2018 Plan will be administered by the compensation and talent committee. The compensation and talent committee has full power to select, from among the individuals eligible for awards, the individuals to whom awards will be granted, to make any combination of awards to participants, and to determine the specific terms and conditions of each award, subject to the provisions of the Amended 2018 Plan. The compensation and talent committee may delegate to our chief executive officer or another executive officer or a committee comprised of the chief executive officer and another officer or officers of the Company the authority to grant awards to employees who are not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and not members of the delegated committee, subject to certain limitations and guidelines
Eligibility; Plan Limits. All full-time and part-time officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants are eligible to participate in the Amended 2018 Plan, subject to the discretion of the administrator. As of March 31, 2022, approximately 1,413 individuals would have been eligible to participate in the Amended 2018 Plan had it been effective on such date, which includes five executive officers, 1,408 employees who are not executive officers, eight non-employee directors and zero consultants. There are certain limits on the number of awards that may be granted under the Amended 2018 Plan. For example, no more than 3,420,000 shares of common stock may be granted in the form of incentive stock options.
Director Compensation Limit. The Amended 2018 Plan provides that the value of all awards awarded under the Amended 2018 Plan and all other cash compensation paid by the Company to any non-employee director in any calendar year shall not exceed $750,000 and no more than 50,000 shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to awards under the Amended 2018 Plan to any non-employee director in any calendar year.
Minimum Vesting Period. The minimum vesting period for each equity award granted under the Amended 2018 Plan must be at least one year, provided (1) that up to 5% of the shares authorized for issuance under the Amended 2018 Plan may be utilized for unrestricted stock awards or other equity awards with a minimum vesting period of less than one year and (2) annual awards to non-employee directors that occur in connection with the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders may vest on the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders but in no event shall the vesting period for such awards be less than 50 weeks. In addition, the administrator may grant equity awards that vest within one year (i) if such awards are granted as substitute awards in replacement of other awards (or awards previously granted by an entity being acquired (or assets of which are being acquired)) that were scheduled to vest within one year or (ii) if such awards are being granted in connection with an elective deferral of cash compensation that, absent a deferral election, otherwise would have been paid to the grantee within the one year.
Stock Options. The Amended 2018 Plan permits the granting of (1) options to purchase common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code and (2) options that do not so qualify. Options granted under the Amended 2018 Plan will be non-qualified options if they fail to qualify as incentive options or exceed the annual limit on incentive stock options. Incentive stock options may only be granted to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. Non-qualified options may be granted to any persons eligible to receive incentive options and to non-employee directors and consultants. The option exercise price of each option will be determined by the compensation and talent committee but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Fair market value for this purpose will be the last reported sale price of the shares of common stock on Nasdaq on the date
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
65
immediately preceding the grant date. The exercise price of an option may not be reduced after the date of the option grant, other than to appropriately reflect changes in our capital structure.
The term of each option will be fixed by the compensation and talent committee and may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The compensation and talent committee will determine at what time or times each option may be exercised. Options may be made exercisable in installments and the exercisability of options may be accelerated by the compensation and talent committee. In general, unless otherwise permitted by the compensation and talent committee, no option granted under the Amended 2018 Plan is transferable by the optionee other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order, and options may be exercised during the optionee’s lifetime only by the optionee, or by the optionee’s legal representative or guardian in the case of the optionee’s incapacity.
Upon exercise of options, the option exercise price must be paid in full either in cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument acceptable to the compensation and talent committee or by delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of common stock that are beneficially owned by the optionee and that are not subject to risk of forfeiture. Subject to applicable law, the exercise price may also be delivered to the Company by a broker pursuant to irrevocable instructions to the broker from the optionee. In addition, the compensation and talent committee may permit non-qualified options to be exercised using a net exercise feature which reduces the number of shares issued to the optionee by the number of shares with a fair market value equal to the exercise price.
To qualify as incentive options, options must meet additional federal tax requirements, including a $100,000 limit on the value of shares subject to incentive options that first become exercisable by a participant in any one calendar year.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The compensation and talent committee may award stock appreciation rights subject to such conditions and restrictions as the compensation and talent committee may determine. Stock appreciation rights entitle the recipient to cash or shares of common stock equal to the value of the appreciation in the stock price over the exercise price. The exercise price will be determined by the compensation and talent committee but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The term of a stock appreciation right may not exceed ten years.
Restricted Stock. The compensation and talent committee may award shares of common stock to participants subject to such conditions and restrictions as the compensation and talent committee may determine. These conditions and restrictions may include the achievement of certain performance goals and/or continued employment or other service relationship with us through a specified restricted period. During the vesting period, restricted stock awards may be credited with dividends but dividends payable with respect to a restricted stock award shall not be paid unless and until the awards vests.
Restricted Stock Units. The compensation and talent committee may award restricted stock units to participants. Restricted stock units are ultimately payable in the form of cash or shares of common stock subject to such conditions and restrictions as the compensation and talent committee may determine. These conditions and restrictions may include the achievement of certain performance goals and/or continued employment or other service relationship with the Company through a specified vesting period. In the compensation and talent committee’s sole discretion, it may permit a participant to make an advance election to receive a portion of his or her future cash compensation otherwise due in the form of a restricted stock unit award, subject to the participant’s compliance with the procedures established by the compensation and talent committee and requirements of Section 409A of the Code. During the deferral period, the deferred stock awards may be credited with dividend equivalent rights.
Unrestricted Stock Awards. The compensation and talent committee may also grant shares of common stock which are free from any restrictions under the Amended 2018 Plan. Unrestricted stock may be granted to any participant in recognition of past services or other valid consideration and may be issued in lieu of cash compensation due to such participant.
Dividend Equivalent Rights. The compensation and talent committee may grant dividend equivalent rights to participants, which entitle the recipient to receive credits for dividends that would be paid if the recipient had held specified shares of common stock. Dividend equivalent rights may be granted as a component of an award of restricted stock units or as a freestanding award.Dividend equivalent rights granted as a component of an award of restricted stock units may be paid only if the restricted stock unit award becomes vested. Dividend equivalent rights may not be granted as a component of a stock option or stock appreciation right award. Dividend equivalent rights may be settled in cash, shares of common stock or a combination thereof, in a single installment or installments, as specified in the award.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
66
Cash-Based Awards. The compensation and talent committee may grant cash bonuses under the Amended 2018 Plan to participants. The cash bonuses may be subject to the achievement of certain performance goals.
Change of Control Provisions. The Amended 2018 Plan provides that upon the effectiveness of a “sale event,” as defined in the Amended 2018 Plan, all awards will terminate in connection with a sale event unless they are assumed, substituted, or continued by the successor entity. To the extent the parties to the sale event do not provide for awards under the Amended 2018 Plan to be assumed, substituted or continued by the successor entity, awards of stock options and stock appreciation rights will become exercisable prior to their termination. In addition, the Company may make or provide for payment, in cash or in kind, to participants awards equal to the difference between the per share cash consideration and the applicable exercise price (if any), or each participant will be permitted, within a specified period of time prior to the consummation of the sale event, to exercise all outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights (to the extent then exercisable) held by such participant, but in such case the board of directors shall first accelerate the exercisability of such stock options and stock appreciation rights prior to termination. Unless otherwise determined by our board of directors, any repurchase rights or other rights of the Company that relate to an award will continue to apply to consideration (including cash) that has been substituted, assumed, amended or paid in connection with a sale event.
Adjustments for Stock Dividends, Stock Splits, Etc. The Amended 2018 Plan requires the compensation and talent committee to make appropriate adjustments to the number of shares of common stock that are subject to the Amended 2018 Plan, to certain limits in the Amended 2018 Plan, and to any outstanding awards to reflect stock dividends, stock splits, extraordinary cash dividends and similar events.
Tax Withholding. Participants in the Amended 2018 Plan are responsible for the payment of any federal, state or local taxes that the Company is required by law to withhold upon the exercise of options or stock appreciation rights or vesting of other awards. Subject to approval by the compensation and talent committee, participants may elect to have their tax withholding obligations satisfied by authorizing the Company to withhold shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to exercise or vesting. The compensation and talent committee may also require awards to be subject to mandatory share withholding up to the required withholding amount.
Amendments and Termination. The board of directors may at any time amend or discontinue the Amended 2018 Plan and the compensation and talent committee may at any time amend or cancel any outstanding award for the purpose of satisfying changes in the law or for any other lawful purpose. However, no such action may adversely affect any rights under any outstanding award without the holder’s consent. To the extent required under Nasdaq rules, any amendments that materially change the terms of the Amended 2018 Plan will be subject to approval by our stockholders. Amendments shall also be subject to approval by our stockholders if and to the extent determined by the compensation and talent committee to be required by the Code to preserve the qualified status of incentive options.
Effective Date of Plan. The 2018 Plan was originally approved by our board of directors on March 26, 2018, and approved by our stockholders on May 23, 2018 and the first amendment to the 2018 Plan was originally approved by our board of directors on March 24, 2020, and approved by our stockholders on May 20, 2020. The Plan Amendment was approved by the board of directors on March 30, 2022. Awards of incentive options may be granted under the Amended 2018 Plan until March 23, 2028. No other awards may be granted under the Amended 2018 Plan after May 23, 2028.
New Plan Benefits
Because the grant of awards under the Amended 2018 Plan is within the discretion of the compensation and talent committee, the Company cannot determine the dollar value or number of shares of common stock that will in the future be received by or allocated to any participant in the Amended 2018 Plan. Accordingly, in lieu of providing information regarding benefits that will be received under the Amended 2018 Plan, the following table provides information concerning the benefits that were received by the following persons and groups during 2021: each named executive officer; all current executive officers, as a group; all current directors who are not executive officers, as a group; and all current employees who are not executive officers, as a group.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
67
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
| Name and Position | Average Exercise Price ($) | Number of Awards (#) | | Dollar Value ($)(1) | Number of Awards |
Colin Angle, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director | — | — | | 5,418,537 | 45,408 |
| Julie Zeiler, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | — | — | | 1,477,782 | 12,384 |
Glen Weinstein, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal | — | — | | 1,280,650 | 10,732 |
| Officer | |
Jean Jacques Blanc, Executive Vice President and Chief | | | | 1,231,486 | 10,320 |
| Commercial Officer | |
Faris Habbaba, Executive Vice President, Executive Vice | — | — | | 2,214,919 | 23,113 |
| President, Chief Research and Development Officer | |
| All current executive officers, as a group | — | — | | 11,623,374 | 101,957 |
| All current directors who are not executive officers, as group | — | — | | 1,490,457 | 15,956 |
| All current employees who are not executive officers, as a group | — | — | | 46,045,537 | 539,710 |
| | | | | |
| (1) | The valuation of stock awards is based on the grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718 disregarding any estimates of forfeitures. The grant date fair value is the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant multiplied by the number of shares of common stock underlying such stock award. |
Tax Aspects under the Code
The following is a summary of the principal federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the Amended 2018 Plan. It does not describe all federal tax consequences under the Amended 2018 Plan, nor does it describe state or local tax consequences.
Incentive Options. No taxable income is generally realized by the optionee upon the grant or exercise of an incentive option. If shares of common stock issued to an optionee pursuant to the exercise of an incentive option are sold or transferred after two years from the date of grant and after one year from the date of exercise, then (i) upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price (the amount paid for the shares) will be taxed to the optionee as a long-term capital gain, and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss, and (ii) the Company will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes. The exercise of an incentive option will give rise to an item of tax preference that may result in alternative minimum tax liability for the optionee.
If shares of common stock acquired upon the exercise of an incentive option are disposed of prior to the expiration of the two-year and one-year holding periods described above (a “disqualifying disposition”), generally (i) the optionee will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of the shares of common stock at exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on a sale of such shares of common stock) over the exercise price thereof, and (ii) we will be entitled to deduct such amount. Special rules will apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the incentive option is paid by tendering shares of common stock.
If an incentive option is exercised at a time when it no longer qualifies for the tax treatment described above, the option is treated as a non-qualified option. Generally, an incentive option will not be eligible for the tax treatment described above if it is exercised more than three months following termination of employment (or one year in the case of termination of employment by reason of disability). In the case of termination of employment by reason of death, the three-month rule does not apply.
Non-Qualified Options. No income is realized by the optionee at the time a non-qualified option is granted. Generally (i) at exercise, ordinary income is realized by the optionee in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of exercise, and we receive a tax deduction for the same amount, and (ii) at disposition, appreciation or depreciation after the date of exercise is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on how long the shares of common stock have been held. Special rules will apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the non-qualified option is paid by tendering shares of common stock. Upon exercise, the optionee will also be subject to Social Security taxes on the excess of the fair market value over the exercise price of the option.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
68
Other Awards. The Company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with other awards under the Amended 2018 Stock Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by the participant at the time the participant recognizes such income. Participants typically are subject to income tax and recognize such tax at the time that an award is exercised, vests or becomes non-forfeitable, unless the award provides for a further deferral.
Parachute Payments. The vesting of any portion of an award that is accelerated due to the occurrence of a change in control (such as a sale event) may cause a portion of the payments with respect to such accelerated awards to be treated as “parachute payments” as defined in the Code. Any such parachute payments may be non-deductible to the Company, in whole or in part, and may subject the recipient to a non-deductible 20% federal excise tax on all or a portion of such payment (in addition to other taxes ordinarily payable).
Limitation on Deductions. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company’s deduction for awards under the Amended 2018 Stock Plan may be limited to the extent that any “covered employee” (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code) receives compensation in excess of $1 million a year.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of January 1, 2022 regarding shares of common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans, consisting of the iRobot Corporation 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, the Evolution Robotics, Inc. 2007 Stock Plan, the 2015 Plan, the 2018 Plan and our 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"). We have no equity compensation plans that were not approved by security holders.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, units and rights (a) | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, units and rights (b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities referenced in column (a))(c) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 1,421,083(1) | $36.11 | 1,023,556(2) |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — |
| Total | 1,421,083 | $36.11 | 1,023,556 |
| | | | | |
| |
| (1) | Includes 132,745 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options, 1,003,216 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs, and 285,122 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of PSUs if specified performance metrics are achieved. |
| (2) | As of January 1, 2022, there were no shares available for grants under the 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, the Evolution Robotics, Inc. 2007 Stock Plan or the 2015 Plan. As of January 1, 2022, there were 1,023,556 shares available under the 2018 Plan and 465,465 shares available under the ESPP. |
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE IROBOT CORPORATION 2018 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
69
NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution approving the named executive officers’ compensation described herein. This proposal, known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives the Company’s stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officer’s compensation. At our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders voted, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for the Company to hold future say-on-pay votes on an annual basis. In accordance with the advisory vote by our stockholders, we hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers every year.
This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or the compensation of any particular officer, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, as discussed in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at our annual meeting of stockholders:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative discussion.”
Before you vote, we recommend that you read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Summary Of Recent And Proposed Changes To Corporate Governance And Executive Compensation –
Executive Compensation” sections of this Proxy Statement for additional details on the Company’s executive compensation programs and philosophy.
This vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the compensation and talent committee or our board of directors. However, our board of directors and our compensation and talent committee value the opinions of our stockholders and intend to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.officers
.
Recommendation of the Board:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL,
ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock as of March 11, 2021:2022: (i) by each person who is known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock; (ii) by each director or nominee of the Company; (iii) by each named executive officer of the Company; and (iv) by all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each person listed on the table is c/o iRobot Corporation, 8 Crosby Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730.| Name of Beneficial Owner | | Shares Beneficially Owned(1) | | Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned(2) |
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055 | | 4,989,225 | | 17.6% |
The Vanguard Group(4)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355 | | 3,094,316 | | 10.9% |
PRIMECAP Management Company(5)
177 E. Colorado Blvd., 11th Floor
Pasadena, CA 91105 | | 2,956,913 | | 10.4% |
| Colin M. Angle(6) | | 387,812 | | 1.36% |
| Alison Dean | | 46,939 | | * |
| Glen Weinstein(7) | | 45,919 | | * |
| Russell J. Campanello(8) | | 34,277 | | * |
| Michelle Stacy(9) | | 21,560 | | * |
| Tim Saeger(10) | | 20,798 | | * |
| Deborah G. Ellinger | | 18,636 | | * |
| Mohamad Ali | | 17,473 | | * |
| Julie Zeiler(11) | | 13,345 | | * |
| Elisha Finney | | 6,142 | | * |
| Michael Bell | | 5,547 | | * |
| Andrew Miller | | 4,251 | | * |
| Eva Manolis | | 2,816 | | * |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | | 2,452 | | * |
| Keith Hartsfield | | 988 | | * |
| All executive officers, directors and nominees as a group (15 individuals)(12) | | 628,955 | | 2.21% |
| | | | | | | | |
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Shares Beneficially Owned(1) | Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned(2) |
BlackRock, Inc.(3) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | 5,016,703 | 18.52% |
The Vanguard Group(4) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | 2,887,597 | 10.66% |
PRIMECAP Management Company(5) 177 E. Colorado Blvd., 11th Floor Pasadena, CA 91105 | 2,421,043 | 8.94% |
Pictet Asset Management SA(6) 60 Route des Acacias 1211 Geneva 73 Switzerland | 1,581,077 | 5.84% |
| Colin Angle(7) | 371,659 | 1.37% |
| Mohamad Ali | 19,382 | * |
| Michael Bell | 7,681 | * |
| Deborah Ellinger | 19,920 | * |
| Karen Golz | — | * |
| Ruey-Bin Kao | 4,562 | * |
| Andrew Miller | 5,339 | * |
| Eva Manolis | 4,950 | * |
Michelle Stacy(8) | 13,694 | * |
Jean Jacques Blanc(9) | 19,171 | * |
| Faris Habbaba | 11,986 | * |
Glen Weinstein(10) | 40,298 | * |
Julie Zeiler(11) | 29,697 | * |
| All executive officers, directors and nominees as a group (15 individuals)(12) | 598,678 | 2.20% |
| | | | | |
| |
| * | Represents less than 1% of the outstanding common stock. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
| (1) | Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares. Unless otherwise indicated below, to the knowledge of the Company, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock, except to the extent authority is shared by spouses under applicable law. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the number of shares of common stock deemed outstanding includes (i) shares issuable pursuant to options held by the respective person or group that are currently exercisable or may be exercised within 60 days of March 11, 20212022 and (ii) shares issuable pursuant to restricted stock units held by the respective person or group that vest within 60 days of March 11, 2021.2022. |
| (2) | Applicable percentage of ownership as of March 11, 20212022 is based upon 28,325,57627,094,062 shares of common stock outstanding. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
71
| | | | | |
| (3) | BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 4,853,0384,875,515 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,989,2255,016,703 shares. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. This information has been obtained from a Schedule 13G13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on January 25, 2021.28, 2022. |
| (4) | The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, shared voting power with respect to 64,75448,985 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,007,7762,813,726 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 86,54073,871 shares. The address of each reporting entityThe Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355. This information has been obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. with the SEC on February 10, 2021.2022. |
| (5) | PRIMECAP Management Company has sole voting power with respect to 2,956,9132,421,043 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,956,9132,421,043 shares. The address of PRIMECAP Management Company is 177 E. Colorado Blvd, 11th Floor, Pasadena, CA 91105. This information has been obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed by PRIMECAP Management Company with the SEC on February 12, 2021.10, 2022. |
| (6) | Pictet Asset Management SA has sole voting power with respect to 1,581,077 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,581,077 shares. Pictet Asset Management SA disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares, which are owned of record and beneficially by two U.S. funds and one non-U.S. mutual fund, both managed by Pictet Asset Management SA. The address of Pictet Asset Management SA is 60 Route des Acacias, 1211 Geneva 73, Switzerland. This information has been obtained from a Schedule 13G filed by Pictet Asset Management SA with the SEC on February 10, 2022. |
| (7) | Includes 133,25190,313 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options. |
(7) | Includes 15,825options and 4,541 shares issuable upon exercisevesting of restricted stock options.units. |
| (8) | Includes 3,530 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options. |
(9) | Includes 19,0007,435 shares held in twoa grantor-retained annuity truststrust for the benefit of Ms. Stacy during the annuity term of the trust and for the benefit of her children thereafter. |
(10)(9) | Includes 20,798636 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options.options and 1,290 shares issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units. |
| (10) | Includes 1,342 shares issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units. |
| (11) | Includes 5,950 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options.options and 1,548 shares issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units. |
| (12) | Includes 179,35496,899 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options.options and 11,095 shares issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units. |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
The board of directors knows of no other matters to be brought before the annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the annual meeting, the persons appointed in the accompanying proxy intend to vote the shares represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment on such matters, under applicable laws.
Householding of Proxy Materials
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Notice or other proxy materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
Brokers with account holders who are Company stockholders may be “householding” our proxy materials. A single Notice or other proxy materials may be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that it will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you notify your broker or the Company that you no longer wish to participate in “householding.”
If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate Notice of other proxy materials, you may (1) notify your broker, (2) direct your written request to: iRobot Corporation, 8 Crosby Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, Attention: Secretary or (3) contact our Investor Relations department by telephone at (781) 430-3003. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Notice or other proxy materials at their address and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact their broker. In addition, the Company will promptly deliver, upon written or oral request to the address or telephone number above, a separate copy of the annual report and Proxy Statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered.
Proposals of stockholders intended for inclusion in the Proxy Statement to be furnished to all stockholders entitled to vote at our 20222023 annual meeting of stockholders, pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act by the SEC, must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices not later than December 13, 2021.12, 2022. Stockholders who meet the applicable eligibility requirements under the proxy access provision of our by-laws and wish to include nominees for our board of directors in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20222023 annual meeting, or stockholders who wish to make a proposal at the 20222023 annual meeting (other than a proposal made pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or pursuant to the proxy access provision of our by-laws), must in each case notify us betweenbetween January 25, 202227, 2023 and February 24, 2022.26, 2023. If a stockholder who wishes to present a proposal fails to notify us by February 24, 202226, 2023 and such proposal is brought before the 20222023 annual meeting, then under the SEC’s proxy rules, the proxies solicited by management with respect to the 20222023 annual meeting will confer discretionary voting authority with respect to the stockholder’s proposal on the persons selected by management to vote the proxies. If a stockholder makes a timely notification, the proxies may still exercise discretionary voting authority under circumstances consistent with the SEC’s proxy rules. To comply with the universal proxy rules (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 28, 2023. In order to curtail controversy as to the date on which we received a proposal, itNotice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and iRobot 2021 Proxy Statement
is suggested that proponents submit their proposals by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to iRobot Corporation, 8 Crosby Drive, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730, Attention: Secretary.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required by regulations of the SEC to furnish us with copies of all such filings. Based solely on our review of copies of such filings we believe that all such persons complied on a timely basis with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the fiscal year ended January
2, 2021,1, 2022, except for the following: a delinquent Form 4 filed by
Ms. WongMr. Ali on
June 11, 2020 relating to the grant of 4,745 restricted stock units on June 5, 2020; and a delinquent Form 4 filed by Mr. Angle on April 1,July 2, 2021 relating to the
giftaward of
12,325173.92 shares of
commonphantom stock on
November 3, 2020.March 31, 2021.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
73
EXPENSES AND SOLICITATION
The Company will pay all costs of soliciting these proxies. In addition, some of our officers and employees may solicit proxies by telephone or in person. We will reimburse brokers for the expenses they incur in forwarding the proxy materials to you. The Company has retained Georgeson LLC to assist us with solicitation for a minimum fee of $12,500,$13,500, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. Additional fees may be incurred based on the scope of outreach and engagement services conducted by Georgeson on behalf of the Company.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 20212022 Proxy Statement
TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN
The graph below matches the cumulative Five-Year total return of holders of iRobot Corporation's common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Nasdaq Composite index and a customized peer group of sixteen companies that includes: Dolby Laboratories Inc, 3D Systems Corp, Gopro Inc, Faro Technologies Inc, Logitech International Sa, Netgear Inc, Novanta Inc, Trimble Inc, Universal Electronics Inc, Azenta Inc (formerly Brooks Automation Inc.), Coherent Inc, Garmin Ltd, Ubiquiti Inc, Roku Inc, Sonos Inc and Plantronics Inc. The peer group also included Fitbit, Inc. until Google completed its acquisition of Fibit, Inc. on January 14, 2021. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, in each index, and in the peer group (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on 12/31/2016 and tracks it through 12/31/2021.
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN*
Among iRobot Corporation, the Nasdaq Composite Index, and a Peer Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 12/16 | | 12/17 | | 12/18 | | 12/19 | | 12/20 | | 12/21 |
| iRobot Corporation | | 100.00 | | 131.22 | | 143.27 | | 86.62 | | 137.37 | | 112.71 |
| Nasdaq Composite | | 100.00 | | 129.64 | | 125.96 | | 172.17 | | 249.51 | | 304.85 |
| Peer Group | | 100.00 | | 132.28 | | 118.86 | | 193.14 | | 316.89 | | 326.17 |
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholdersand iRobot 2022 Proxy Statement
75
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The following are proposed changes to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation as described in Proposal 3.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
iRobot Corporation (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), does hereby certify:
1. Pursuant to Section 242 of the DGCL, this Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (this “Amendment”) amends the provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Certificate”).
2. This Amendment has been approved and duly adopted by the Corporation’s Board of Directors and stockholders in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.
3. The Certificate is hereby amended as follows:
A. In Article VI, Section 5, the phrase “holders of 75% or more” is hereby deleted and replaced with the word “majority”.
B. Article VIII, Section 2 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as set forth below:
“Amendment by Stockholders. The By-laws of the Corporation may be amended or repealed at any annual meeting of stockholders, or special meeting of stockholders called for such purpose as provided in the By-laws, by the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote on such amendment or repeal, voting together as a single class (with “abstentions”, “broker non-votes” and “withheld” votes not counted as a vote either “for” or “against” such amendment or repeal).”
C. Article IX is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as set forth below:
“AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The Corporation reserves the right to amend or repeal this Certificate in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute and this Certificate, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation. Whenever any vote of the holders of voting stock is required to amend or repeal any provision of this Certificate, and in addition to any other vote of holders of voting stock that is required by this Certificate or by law, such amendment or repeal shall require the affirmative vote of the majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on such amendment or repeal, and the affirmative vote of the majority of the outstanding shares of each class entitled to vote thereon as a class, at a duly constituted meeting of stockholders called expressly for such purpose.”
***
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The following are proposed changes to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation as described in Proposal 4.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
iRobot Corporation (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), does hereby certify:
1. Pursuant to Section 242 of the DGCL, this Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (this “Amendment”) amends the provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Certificate”).
2. This Amendment has been approved and duly adopted by the Corporation’s Board of Directors and stockholders in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.
3. The Certificate is hereby amended as follows:
Article VI, Sections 3, 4 and 5 are hereby amended and restated in their entirety to read as set forth below:
“3. Number of Directors; Term of Office. The number of Directors of the Corporation shall be fixed solely and exclusively by resolution duly adopted from time to time by the Board of DirectorsDirectors.
Subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of any series of Undesignated Preferred Stock, at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation that is held in calendar year
20222023 and at each annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation thereafter, all Directors shall be elected to hold office for a one-year term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Directors shall hold office until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, death or removal.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, whenever, pursuant to the provisions of Article IV of this Certificate, the holders of any one or more series of Undesignated Preferred Stock shall have the right, voting separately as a series or together with holders of other such series, to elect Directors at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, the election, term of office, filling of vacancies and other features of such directorships shall be governed by the terms of this Certificate and any certificate of designations applicable thereto.
4. Vacancies. Subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of any series of Undesignated Preferred Stock to elect Directors and to fill vacancies in the Board of Directors relating thereto, any and all vacancies in the Board of Directors, however occurring, including, without limitation, by reason of an increase in size of the Board of Directors, or the death, resignation, disqualification or removal of a Director, shall be filled solely and exclusively by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining Directors then in office, even if less than a quorum of the Board of Directors, and not by the stockholders. Any Director appointed in accordance with the preceding sentence shall hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation held after such appointment and until such Director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation, death or removal. In the event of a vacancy in the Board of Directors, the remaining Directors, except as otherwise provided by law, shall exercise the powers of the full Board of Directors until the vacancy is filled.
5.Removal. Subject to the rights, if any, of any series of Undesignated Preferred Stock to elect Directors and to remove any Director whom the holders of any such stock have the right to elect, any Director (including persons elected by Directors to fill vacancies in the Board of Directors) may be removed from
office without cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% or more of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of Directors. At least forty-five (45) days prior to any meeting of stockholders at which it is proposed that any Director be removed from office, written notice of such proposed removal shall be sent to the Director whose removal will be considered at the meeting.”
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The following are proposed changes to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation as described in Proposal 5.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
iRobot Corporation (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), does hereby certify:
1. Pursuant to Section 242 of the DGCL, this Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (this “Amendment”) amends the provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Certificate”).
2. This Amendment has been approved and duly adopted by the Corporation’s Board of Directors and stockholders in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.
3. The Certificate is hereby amended as follows:
Article V, Section 2 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as set forth below:
“2. Special Meetings. Only those matters set forth in the notice of the special meeting may be considered or acted upon at a special meeting of stockholders of the CorporationCorporation.”
***
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
***************
ANNEX D
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE
IROBOT CORPORATION
2018 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, iRobot Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the iRobot Corporation 2018 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which was previously adopted by the Board of Directors on March 26, 2018 and approved by the stockholders of the Company on May 23, 2018;
WHEREAS, the Plan was amended effective May 20, 2020 to increase the number of shares reserved under the Plan;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company believes that the number of shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) remaining available for issuance under the Plan, as amended has become insufficient for the Company’s anticipated future needs under the Plan;
WHEREAS, Section 16 of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company may amend the Plan at any time, subject to certain conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan, subject to stockholder approval, to increase both the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan, and the number of shares that may be issued in the form of Incentive Stock Options (as defined in the Plan) from 2,495,000 shares to 3,420,000 shares.
NOW, THEREFORE:
1. Increase in Shares. Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
“The maximum number of shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be 3,420,000 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in this Section 3. For purposes of this limitation, the shares of Stock underlying any awards under the Plan or the Company’s 2015 Stock Option and Incentive Plan that are forfeited, canceled or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) shall be added back to the shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shares shall not be added to the shares authorized for grant under the Plan: (i) shares tendered or held back upon exercise of an Option or settlement of an Award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding, and (ii) shares subject to a Stock Appreciation Right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the Stock Appreciation Right upon exercise thereof. In the event the Company repurchases shares of Stock on the open market, such shares shall not be added to the shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan. Subject to such overall limitations, shares of Stock may be issued up to such maximum number pursuant to any type or types of Award; provided, however, that no more than 3,420,000 shares of the Stock may be issued in the form of Incentive Stock Options. The shares available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Stock or shares of Stock reacquired by the Company.”
2. Effective Date of Amendment. This Amendment to the Plan shall become effective upon the date that it is approved by the Company’s stockholders in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
3. Other Provisions. Except as set forth above, all other provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged.
8 Crosby Drive
Bedford,
MAMassachusetts 01730
International +1 (781) 575-3120
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the symbol “IRBT.”
investorrelations@irobot.com
A copy of our financial reports, stock
quotes, news releases, SEC filings, as
well as information on our products is
available in the Investor Relations section of
Co-founder, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
Lead Independent Director
Director
Deborah Ellinger
Director, Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee Chair
Karen Golz
Director
Ruey-Bin Kao
Director
Eva Manolis
Director
Andrew Miller
Director, Audit Committee Chair
Michelle Stacy
Director, Compensation and Talent Committee
Chair
Deborah G. Ellinger
Director, Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee Chair
Elisha Finney
Director
Ruey-Bin Kao
Director
Eva Manolis
Director
Andrew Miller
Director, Audit Committee Chair
Michelle V. Stacy
Director
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Glen D. Weinstein
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer
Jean Jacques Blanc
Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer
Faris Habbaba
Executive Vice President, Chief Research and Development Officer
Keith Hartsfield
Executive Vice President, Chief Product Officer
Executive Vice President, Human Resources and
Corporate Communications
Glen D. Weinstein
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer
Keith Hartsfield
Executive Vice President, Chief Product Officer
Empowering People To Do More
8 Crosby Drive
Bedford, MA 01730
Phone: 781.430.3000
iRobot.com
info@irobot.com
iRobot.com
